CreateDebate


The Public Waterfall RSS

Every argument gets a chance to be on top!
The Public Waterfall shows you all arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

No it is not a good choice to give kids smart phones, because where phones are useful they can be very lethal and can leave a bad impression. Other then that, you can get them a phone having call/messages that can help and doesn't have any negative impact. You can buy back to school coupons through which you will be able to get the best discounts for school supplies.

Oh dry up you jack ass

Dermot, shut up. You're a pathetic loser who lacks the intelligence to construct a coherent argument about anything. You spend your entire life here attacking people and telling lies manufactured to try to disguise your own stupidity.

I am not interested in anything you have to say and I guarantee you that nobody else is either. Please give that some thought the next time you feel tempted to douse us all in verbal diarrhoea.

1 point

good one..!! i like this post very much. It has given m a proper guidance for this thing.. It can be very valuable.. !!

That is a sweeping generalization

No, it is a calculated abuse of reason. Bronto's nauseating ideology cannot exist unless he advertises it to be something much different than it is, and part of that process is to project its faults onto other systems of thought.

1 point

i think air is the best beause in space air is the one pick up rock witch are plants like mar earth sun and moon and it can kill water and rock and fire gods if air gods want too and not only that air can just take air in and kill fire water and rock beaues there nose from gods can not go with out air so yeah i think air would win it all if they got nose to stay life lols gg :3 : 3 :) : ) :p : p <3 < 3

0 points

That's because you have offered no valid criticism of Marxism.

Oh dry up you jack ass , you’ve never offered a defence of Marxism in all your time here as it’s yet another topic you know fuck all about , it’s not suprising you support the views of of the vile rapist , loafer and racist Marx

1 point

Anything they don't agree with or like is "like the Holocaust".

That is a sweeping generalization just like your idea that all leftists are communists. If all liberals think that way then all conservatives believe the moon landing was a hoax.

America was created per Marxism?

You think America has always been the most powerful economy on Earth?

Exactly how stupid are you?

I didn't see any defense of Marxism here.

That's because you have offered no valid criticism of Marxism. You have tried to turn reality upside down and now that I have pointed it out you are continuing to abuse language and/or reason.

The solution to class slavery doesn't need to be "defended" to society's slave masters simply because you enjoy your unearned position of privilege.

"this" (whatever that means) is just like the holocaust.

Anything they don't agree with or like is "like the Holocaust".

https://youtu.be/Zz-fS9l4-Q

https://youtu.be/b0nIjtwiLdw

Or you've created a piss poor strawman, and it simply proves that liberals are hyperbolic, lying bafoons.

No, it produced the most powerful economy and culture on Earth. Whoever you are quoting, it is typically false American revisionist bullshit.

I didn't see any defense of Marxism here.

1 point

Fresco is superior to you in every way.

Really ? He’s dead , deceased, defunct , no longer with us .....so I guess that makes you wrong .....again 🙀👌☺️

No, it produced the most powerful economy and culture on Earth.

America was created per Marxism? The lying, delusional little goblin is strong in this one.

1 point

as he parrots mantras from the idiotic musings of Fresco the Fag

Fresco is superior to you in every way.

0 points

I’m FactMachine you bluffing blundering bongo bashing bollocks blowing bloody bitch bastard blighter

Using yet another account , I don’t believe you either way and what a bizarre name for an idiot who does not know fact from fiction as he parrots mantras from the idiotic musings of Fresco the Fag

1 point

It helps save the children from violence. Censoring extreme violent material is beneficial, particularly among children. Censorship would allow them to use the web or watch TV without worrying about their minds being corrupted.

It keeps the negative impact of sex materials away from children.

Sex is a serious topic that creates turmoil among people. Sexual acts, especially porn, would sometimes illustrate many unnatural and disturbing videos. It will likely have a negative impact on children who might think it to be true.

It limits harmful advertisements.

It is understandable that product or service advertisements that are harmful to a person’s health are to be censored or, rather, limited. This will help prevent epidemics, such as alcohol addiction and obesity

helps protect personal security. As information is, somehow, limited with media censorship, threats can be lessened and people are informed of things when they should be. This means chaos and panic would not ensue.

protection of secrets. considering that it is in the best interest of a country that its strategies are kept confidential. Sometimes, we just need to trust our government blindly.

It helps control hate. By controlling the media, the government can also control prejudice, racism and untrue slandering of certain individuals, which might involve races, religions, companies and other countries.

.

Supporting Evidence: media control (connectusfund.org)
1 point

If media is not controlled, fake news can be easily spread with the advancement of technology. Fake news can hurt people's feelings and cause unnecessary panic within the members of the public. For example, there was a photo circulating of NTUC's air-flown fresh pork bearing a 'halal' sticker, which made many muslims unhappy.

1 point

The media has to be facts and actual happening, instead of a "point of view". The safety of the citizens can be compromised if extremist views bring about negativity, for instance, a British wealth fund manage made a comment about poor people in Singapore on Facebook. This brought about unrest and outrage among "hundreds of angry locals" who have"have called for him to leave the country in comments on news and social media websites..." Therefore, the media should be regulated so as to prevent such offensive remarks to spark out unsettling emotions and responses from people.

1 point

Fresco was a deluded cultist with the personality and charisma of pot plant , don’t waste your time listening to any of his gibberish , as for boring one to death he’s on a level with Marx

1 point

it is necessary to control the media because certain uncontrolled information may be offensive to other religions or races.

Shut up pussy. Offensiveness doesn't matter, what matters is truth. All religions are objectively wrong and scientifically stupid, so why shouldn't I be allowed to offend you by telling the truth? Is it because you're a big fat pussy faggot and you need to shut up and let the big boys talk who aren't intellectually nullified by superstition and emotional pussy bullshit?

1 point

First of all, it is necessary to control the media because certain uncontrolled information may be offensive to other religions or races. This is deliberately offensive and unacceptable. One example - Jerry Springer the opera, which made offensive remarks about religion.

Second of all, it is necessary to control the media because it may cause misunderstanding and social unrest. The Charlie Hebdo incident is one good example. They published offensive cartoons that will raise controversial news. This lead to 12 lives taken and many other injured through a brutal shooting.

Hence it is necessary to control the media. Thank you.

1 point

I'm FactMachine you bluffing blundering bongo bashing bollocks blowing bloody bitch bastard blighter

0 points

They stopped debating that already and it only went on for one day and one night, not four days.

Says a newbie and new account only opened 3 hours ago and you’re up to speed with the goings on ..... Nice try Nom so tell me with your new account have you worked out North from South yet ?

I note you even upvoted your new account 4 times , I’m delighted I have you scrambling all over the site in an attempt to defend your stupidity

3 points

1)What did Barack Obama and John Brennan do to stop Russian hacking, meddling, etc?

I don't fucking care. What makes you think all leftists support or like or agree with Obama? It's because you're fucking retarded and deserve to die.

2)Why did Barack Obama appoint an open Soviet controlled Communist (John Brennan) to head the CIA?

Because you don't know what the fuck communism means.

REAL DEFINITION OF COMMUNISM:

a socioeconomic order structured upon the collective ownership of the means of production.

BRONTO'S DEFINITION OF COMMUNISM:

Anything left of center.

3)Why did Democrats nearly elect Bernie Sanders, who attended a Russian Marxist, Communist kibbutz as a student?

Why did Republicans elect a womanizing Hitlerian Russia-pandering douche nozzle that looks like he sleeps in a bag of cheetos?

2 points

It’s remarkable you even know left from right when you’re still “ debating “ with the other idiot where North and South are ......mate 🙀👌😂

They stopped debating that already and it only went on for one day and one night, not four days.

-2 points
-1 points

Quoting Chomsky doesn't make you an intellectual you thick bastard , you're a long winded boring jackass who prints of a novel in response to simple questions

No one read your horseshit .,, mate

Maybe you should get back to " thrashing " out where North and South are with your buddy seeing as it's still " unresolved "

for you .......mate

0 points

That's confirmation that you're a boring fucking retard who doesn't listen when he's told something repeatedly and shown evidence to corroborate it.

Shown evidence ? 😂😂😂 In all your time here you've never once backed any of your ranting up , you spent three days arguing over where North and South are and the veracity of my claim can be evidenced by anyone who cares to read

You're a pathetic fucking clown with nothing intelligent to say on any topic.

But you don't know North from South so I cannot accept your " opinion" on the matter

Literally all you do is use your own lies as a basis to attack people. You're a worthless fucking prick with no joy in his life.

There's that projection again Nom are you really that unhappy ?

I have never argued where North and South are on this website, ever, and I don't know how many times you need to have this explained to you.

Your denial is hilarious you're like a red faced petty thief caught in the act

Are you fucking autistic?

No , obviously you're the one with a range of serious medical and and mental issues

Truth isn't mean bro.

I know , so why not admit you don't know North from South ..,, bro ?

It's just truth.

an alien concept to you

Even your dead mother hated you, and I don't blame her. You are absolutely worthless and have no redeeming qualities as a human being.

I'm glad I kept you up all night thinking up a reply and that's it ?

All because you don't know Morth from South .....,Just , Wow !

Your very existence is predicated on the need to cause pain in others.

Says the guy who spends 24/7 attempting to do .,,just that

It's sad and I genuinely feel sorry for you because we both know you act the way you do because of the pain you feel inside that you are so talentless,

There's that projection again Nom ..... Real meaning = You work in a shit job where you get bossed and bullied all day , you're one of life's bitter losers who's failed at everything in life and undoubtably are most likely a pasty faced tubby with body odour problems , enjoy you shift at Burger King today , what time do you start at ?

ugly and stupid.

There's that projection yet again Nom , it's a given you're both ugly and stupid ..,.. So tell us have you worked out with your "buddy" North from South yet ?

0 points

Yes, a human fetus

I think that's a given

think you misunderstand, I mean what kind of fetus if you say it's not human. Is it an alien?

I said it's a potential / developing human

How is it not human if it has human characteristics, and comes from a human?

How's an apple seed not an apple tree when it comes from an apple ?

Well, when it's aborted, the fetus' life is ended. How? Well, it gets killed by a person. It's basically legal murder.

If it's legal well legally it's not murder , I disagree with the rights of American citizens to carry guns but it's legal you defend this yet you attack others because they're granted a right you disagree with , that's life isn't it ?

3 points

If the media controls the media, then bias and special interests will compromise their honesty.

If corporations control the media, then special interests will compromise their honesty.

If the state controls the media, then propaganda will compromise their honesty.

If the people control the media, then stupidity will compromise their honesty.

Scientific methodology must be what controls the media, not actual people. It must be made mandatory that the media uses scientific methodology to arrive at and back up any statement of fact.

1 point

Bravo, you have just disproven liberalism by posting a bunch of pictures of dead bodies, military vehicles and explosions etc. and asserting that liberals think "this" (whatever that means) is just like the holocaust.

1 point

Or that Iran had on Obama.

Inside Obama’s secret plot to let Iran skirt sanctions

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access to the US financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no plans to do so.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/ 2018/06/06/inside-obamas-secret-plot-to-let-iran-skirt-sanctions/amp/

1 point

The same thing he must have had on Obama.

Did Obama Pledge ‘More Flexibility’ Toward Russia After the 2012 Election?

In 2012, President Obama was overheard over a hot microphone telling President Dmitri Medvedev of Russia he would have "more flexibility" to negotiate with Putin after the election.

As he was leaning toward Medvedev in Seoul, Obama was overheard asking for time — “particularly with missile defense” — until he is in a better position politically to resolve such issues.

“I understand your message about space,” replied Medvedev, who will hand over the presidency to Putin in May.

“This is my last election … After my election I have more flexibility,” Obama said, expressing confidence that he would win a second term.

“I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” said Medvedev, Putin’s protégé and long considered number two in Moscow’s power structure.

The exchange, parts of it inaudible, was monitored by a White House pool of television journalists as well as Russian reporters listening live from their press center.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-more-flexibility-russia/

MurderHole(17) Clarified
2 points

Schizophrenics tend to be unable to justify their beliefs when questioned, I can justify mine in a totally sane way regardless of how insane it can appear to someone who hasn't understood reality yet.

If you really interpolated reality into your brain you would drool on yourself and have an aneurysm. There is absolutely no basis for a crazy female quantum computer with a bag of magic numerical units to pop out of nothing and generate reality. Numbers do not have substance, it is inherently insane to think that they can create something physical. It is inherently insane also to think the physical is an illusion and reality is subjective because it is physical processes that generate consciousness and provide you with something to subjectively perceive in the first place. Please do attempt to dispute this, I will be happy to elaborate.

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

Fate/God/Fiora is not a calculator. This is a term FM came up with for her.

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

Schizophrenics tend to be unable to justify their beliefs when questioned, I can justify mine in a totally sane way regardless of how insane it can appear to someone who hasn't understood reality yet.

outlaw60(11601) Clarified
1 point

Rusty is mentally challenged as it pertains to facts which is nothing new.

1 point

Yes there seems to be no end to the Obama economy but don’t fret, Trump will wreck that too soon enough.

Did MOMMY and DADDY raise U to be the fool U are ?????

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/05/barack-obama-economy-jobs-ugly-truth/

Speak to the greatness of the Supreme One you MOMMY and DADDY brain dead idiot

Trump will wreck that too soon enough.

Yeah, it looks it...

BET founder: Trump's economy is bringing black workers back into the labor force

Robert Johnson, BET founder and founder and chairman of The RLJ Companies, discusses the employment rate among black workers in the U.S. and how they've fared under President Trump.

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/04/06/bet-founder-trumps-economy-is-bringing-black-workers-back-into-the-labor-force.html

Goldman Sachs CEO gives Trump credit for the economy, says it's better than if Hillary Clinton won

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/trump-economy-growth-goldman-sachs-2018- 2

Obama economy

You mean the Bush economy, I mean Clinton economy, I mean other Bush economy, I mean Reagan economy, I mean Carter economy...

https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2006/apr/wk1/mobile/art01.htm

http://www.aei.org/publication/obama-didnt-end-the-great-recession-that-bush-didnt-cause/

1 point

Well, that's MORE than "kind of obvious". It's an absolute, obvious, truth …. to anyone that doesn't have a hood over their face, or isn't a bearded, dumb redneck.

U got a good message there AL do U think it is a winner at the BALLOT BOX ????????

1 point

Trump has a message for the American voter. BELIEVE whatever Putin tells you! He's the most honest, trustworthy killer you will ever have the opportunity to worship! (THAT is "more obvious each and every day"!) Ignore the American patriots, some of which put their lives on the line every day, that say Putin is dangerous! That's the message Putrump says we should have "got"! "Regressives start with "R", as do Republican, racist, rotten and Russia. I prefer to be PRO-GRESSIVE, thank you, VERY much! You may join your basket of deplorables now.

Who worships their party AL ? Might it be U ?

1 point

Yes there seems to be no end to the Obama economy but don’t fret, Trump will wreck that too soon enough.

What you say Little Gurl ????????

Let's punk a DUMMY !!!!!!!!!!

https://nypost.com/2017/04/01/obama-was-terrible-for-economic-growth/

On Thursday we closed the book on the Obama economic “miracle” — and it’s a miracle we are not in a recession.

Last week the Commerce Department released its third revision for fourth-quarter 2016 gross domestic product. The number came in at a paltry 2.1 percent, meaning that growth during President Obama’s final year in office — the end of an “Error of Hope” — landed with a big thud at just 1.6 percent.

That low-water mark puts the Obama presidency in last place among all the post-World War II presidents when it comes to economic growth.

http://www.politifact.com/illinois/statements/2017/mar/16/peter-roskam/rep-roskam-gdp-growth-obama/

Speak to the Obama Economy and tell the greatness of his failure LITTLE Gurl

Gibby_Prime(72) Clarified
1 point

Ex Con wears one too, but it's part of his DNA.

I'm 1% Jewish but I don't wear a hat.

Are you denying science?

No

Jew hater.

?

1 point

Because it has not developed into a human yet.

So when does it become human then? When it gets a central nervous system and is able to feel pain?

I don't get how you think a fetus isn't human. It comes from a human and it looks human. Why does it have to have those qualities in order for it to be considered human?

2 points

Yes there seems to be no end to the Obama economy but don’t fret, Trump will wreck that too soon enough.

AlexJones(72) Clarified
1 point

I am not FM but you are welcome to believe so.

Yes you are FM, as in Fecal Matter.

1 point

she adores me for my ways and has taught me a lot since the alien demigods taught me lessons (she via them spoke to me).

You're literally insane. You think a sentient female calculator generates your reality and speaks to you.

Have you been diagnosed with schizophrenia yet?

Seeing you are an expert concerning porn types and genres, we now know why you reference jacking off so much on this site. Hand to wank. Hand to wank. Hand to wank...hand to hole in face...back to wank. Face hole. Wank. All in an infinite regress of loops of hand to wank mouth wank wank mouth wank hand mouth wank hand...and on and on...

https://youtu.be/0U2zJOryHKQ

Do the recent events in Cambodia yap yap yap

Intentional long winded gish gallup ramblings that no one read.

1 point

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29562-the-lefts-love-for-russian-dictators-other-than-putin

When Ronald Reagan was president, there was no question that most of the Democratic Party’s leading politicians favored Russian communist dictators over the American president. Senator George McGovern expressed relief that, in contrast to Reagan, a much more reasonable man was in power in Moscow — Yuri Andropov. (Interestingly, the American media routinely mentions Putin’s former association with the KGB, but when Andropov was ruling the U.S.S.R., little was said that Andropov had actually headed up the KGB). Former President Jimmy Carter even visited Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin’s residence in 1984 to express his concern about Reagan’s defense buildup. Democrat House Speaker Tip O’Neill told Dobynin that Reagan was a “demagogue” and a “dangerous man.”

Perhaps the actions of Senator Edward Kennedy were the most egregious. It was discovered by a researcher in 1991 that Kennedy had actually communicated to Andropov to ask the then-Soviet dictator to help the Democrats challenge Reagan in 1984 — in other words, interfere in the U.S. election. The memo expressed Kennedy’s view that “The only real potential threats to Reagan [in his race in 1984] are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations.”

Demorats are opposed to the Russians LMMFAO!!!!!!!!!

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

I am not FM but you are welcome to believe so.

1 point

SUPER STUPID what PRESENT will kill us all in the 5 ALARM FIRE u wake up in everyday ?

1 point

LMMFAO SUPER STUPID did 90 percent Republican vote put Trump in office ???

1 point

Will Trumps disgraceful behavior in Helsinki FINALLY ignite the right wing congress to ACT

Okay DUMMY what act do you desire to be seen other than the media fed nonsense you feed upon ?

1 point

I don’t disagree with any of that and I’d even go even further. Trump has gone bankrupt several times. His son is quoted as saying that cash wasn’t a problem for the Trumps because “the Russians” were always ready to contribute. Russia is a kleptocracy and Putin is the head of the Russian Mafia.

I’m convinced that Trump borrowed a lot of money from Putin’s Russian mob which means that Putin owns Trump.

I find it fascinating that the Mueller investigation indicted 12 of Putin’s guys just a couple of days before the big meet in Finland. Not only were indictments made, but specific actions were described in some detail. I believe that this was the United States intellegence gathering agencies sending Putin a message and the message is: “We’re all the way up your ass and deep into your shit. We’re the REAL hackers asshole, and we’ve got you by the balls!”

Conservanazi(487) Clarified
1 point

PsychCentral is not a personal blog, it's a blog

LOL. Oh you thick bastard. Listen to me FactMachine, you silly child: reposting the same crap does not address the argument I have made. It merely tries to scream over the top of it. If you won't address the Wikipedia explanation which disproves you then fuck off and play somewhere else.

1 point

SUPER STUPID you are just not the brightest light on the block and let's refer to the heading of the post which DUMMIES like yourself avoid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXpRswM-tzc

Obama said the elections cannot be rigged but when Hillary went down in flames what did the Leftist say ?????

1 point

The irony is that in practice, even after decades of total control, Marxism did not improve the lot of the average person, but usually made living conditions worse than before the revolution. It is not by chance that the world’s greatest famines have happened within the Soviet Union (about 5 million dead from 1921-23 and 7 million from 1932-3, including 2 million outside Ukraine) and communist China (about 30 million dead from 1959-61). Overall, in the last century almost 55 million people died in various Marxist famines and associated epidemics – a little over 10 million of them were intentionally starved to death, and the rest died as an unintended result of Marxist collectivization and agricultural policies.

Tell me all about the nirvana of Marxism !

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

PsychCentral is not a personal blog, it's a blog though I admit that because the official idea of a blog is that the motive of the posts on it are to be considered 'work of someone' as opposed to 'property of the site more so than the one who wrote it' that's the fundamental thing that makes a blog a blog as opposed to other site-genres.

I am not sure where you're going with this and I'm sure most would have snapped with your really ego-eroding tone that makes the opponent feel humiliated and wounded simply for trying to get their point across but unfortunately, between the two of us you're more sociopath and I am not going to take such bait and leap back abusing you so that you then can say 'look how emotional you're getting, I was just stating facts'.

What I will do is simply add more and more quoted, reliable, medically verified sources that prove you wrong and me right until you stop this reaction-grabbing method and admit that you were wrong in your tone as well as your angle in opposing what I originally posted. The alternative ending is I post so much and you get too repetitively abusing and condescending, then it comes to a state of boredom with your trolling that I won't allow my spare time to be wasted by someone unpleasant when I could spend it with someone pleasant.

WHAT IS A SOCIOPATH?

A sociopath is actually a person with antisocial personality disorder. Antisocial personality disorder is defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (the book which contains the diagnostic criteria for mental illnesses) as a cluster B personality disorder (those that are dramatic or emotional).

While sociopathy can only be diagnosed at the age of 18 or above, the following must be present before the age of 15 for the diagnosis:

Repeated violations of the law

Pervasive lying and deception

Physical aggressiveness

Reckless disregard for safety of self or others

Consistent irresponsibility in work and family environments

Lack of remorse

PSYCHOPATH VS. SOCIOPATH

Psychopathy can be thought of as a more severe form of sociopathy with more symptoms. Therefore, all psychopaths are sociopaths but sociopaths are not necessarily psychopaths.

According to the Society for the Study of Psychopathy, psychopath traits include:

Lack of guilt/remorse

Lack of empathy

Lack of deep emotional attachments

Narcissism

Superficial charm

Dishonesty

Manipulativeness

Reckless risk-taking

Moreover, approximately 93% of psychopaths are in the criminal justice system.

Additional psychopath traits have been identified and more on these can be found in the article, Does a Psychopath Test Exist? Diagnosing the Psychopath.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PSYCHOPATH AND SOCIOPATH

While the traits of each may seem similar, it is thought that sociopaths have a less severe form of lack of empathy and lack of guilt. It is thought that sociopaths may be able to form some deep bonds (such as, possibly, with family) while a psychopath cannot (Can Psychopaths Love, Cry and Experience Joy?). Moreover, while a sociopath would feel no guilt about hurting a stranger, they may feel guilt and remorse over hurting someone with which they share a bond. Additionally, it appears that some of the very antisocial behavior in sociopaths lessens over time while this cannot be said of psychopaths (How To Recognize and Identify Psychopathic Behavior). Psychopaths appear to have no concern whatsoever of the consequences, while a sociopath may learn to avoid consequences over time by reducing antisocial behavior.

Finally, the presentation of one with psychopathy or sociopathy differs. According to Kelly McAleer, Psy.D,

"The psychopath is callous, yet charming. He or she will con and manipulate others with charisma and intimidation and can effectively mimic feelings to present as "normal" to society. The psychopath is organized in their criminal thinking and behavior, and can maintain good emotional and physical control, displaying little to no emotional or autonomic arousal, even under situations that most would find threatening or horrifying. The psychopath is keenly aware that what he or she is doing is wrong, but does not care.

"Conversely, the sociopath is less organized in his or her demeanor; he or she might be nervous, easily agitated, and quick to display anger. A sociopath is more likely to spontaneously act out in inappropriate ways without thinking through the consequences. Compared to the psychopath, the sociopath will not be able to move through society committing callous crimes as easily, as they can form attachments and often have 'normal temperaments.' . . ."

Both psychopaths and sociopaths are capable of committing horrific crimes, but a sociopath is less likely to commit them against those with whom there is a bond.

https://www.healthyplace.com/personality-disorders/psychopath/psychopath-vs-sociopath-what-s-the-difference

Conservanazi(487) Clarified
1 point

Let's ignore the understanding of how being a 'blog' is actually as irrelevant to the validity of the said site as being a '.com' is vs '.net' or whatever you like.

Irrelevant? Are you stupid? Personal blogs are not news stories. They are not fact checked or scrutinised by anybody other than the author.

Here let's explain something more to you to understand how the names began to separate

So in other words you plan to completely ignore the fact that I have provided four different quotes confirming that sociopaths and psychopaths are the same thing?

I am not interested in your poorly written, half-understood rubbish. I am interested in what you have to say in response to the fact that you are talking complete fucking nonsense. For the second time:-

From the late 1920s American psychologist George E. Partridge influentially narrowed the definition of psychopathy to antisocial personality, and from 1930 suggested that a more apt name for it would be sociopathy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historyofpsychopathy

1 point

Arrangements (real, officially agreed arrangements where Putin's tax stash went to the funding as did Trump's pocket) for a group of sworn-secrecy agents to make fake facebook accounts that en masse like each other's posts and refuse to like the posts that don't serve their agenda which in turn makes people feel socially strange and outcasted in any 'interest' group or social media 'belief' page/group-chat for not agreeing with said post.

Same with YouTube Videos where 'disliking' was even more helpful in increasing their power and they'd retweet the links to the FB posts and Youtube vids they wanted paid attention to so on and so forth.

Do the recent events in Cambodia warrant a reconsideration of our opposition to the Vietnam War”? Consider the factual and moral premises that allow this question to be seriously raised.

Let us assume the accuracy of the condemnation of the Khmer Rouge (noting, however, that the susceptibility of intellectuals to fabricated atrocity stories has been no less notorious since World War I than their apologetics for some favored state, and that skepticism is aroused in this case by the many documented falsehoods). On this assumption, should we reconsider opposition to the Vietnam War?

One who raises this question must be assuming (1) that the U.S. war was intended to avert Khmer Rouge barbarity, or might have had this likely effect; and (2) that the U.S. has the right to exercise force and violence to avert potential crimes.

Assumption (1) is ludicrous in the light of the factual record. Cambodia was an island of relative tranquility prior to the American invasion of 1970, though it had been repeatedly attacked by American and U.S.-backed forces from 1957 on. There was limited local insurgency, aroused by government repression, even by the 1960s. As Vietnamese were driven to a narrow border strip by the savage American military operations of early 1967, direct U.S. attacks on Cambodia escalated. By May 1967, the Pentagon was concerned that Cambodia was “becoming more and more important as a supply base — now of food and medicines, perhaps ammunition later,” an obvious consequence of U.S. operations in Vietnam and Laos. In March 1969. shortly after the “secret bombings” began, Sihanouk vainly called upon the Western press to publicize his government’s protest over the “criminal attacks” on Khmer peasants. The 1970 invasion helped organize the Khmer Rouge rebellion as thousands of peasants rallied to the resistance under the impact of the vicious bombing and ground attacks of the U.S. military and the Vietnamese forces it organized. Charles Meyer, who had long been close to ruling forces in Cambodia, warned then that “it is difficult to imagine the intensity of the hatred (of the peasants) for those who destroyed their villages and their possessions” (Derriere le sourir khmer). This was well before the murderous American bombings of the 1970s, which surely inflamed peasant hatred and desire for revenge.

Those who failed to devote their energies to ending the American war in Indochina bear a double burden of guilt: for the atrocities committed under American initiative and for the legacy of starvation, disease, hatred, and revenge that was a direct and predicted consequence of the attack on rural Cambodia. Similar remarks apply in the case of Vietnam and Laos.

Assumption (2) has not been defended explicitly. One can easily see why. If the U.S. is entitled to launch a major war to avert potential barbarism, then a fortiori it is entitled to invade countries where state violence currently proceeds; say, much of Latin America, which turned into a horror chamber in one of the recent successes of U.S. foreign policy. Surely, the absurdities of this position are obvious.

Furthermore, one may ask why the U.S. should be uniquely privileged to serve as global judge and executioner. By virtue of its historic role in defense of freedom and human rights within its own sphere of influence, perhaps? Again, discussion is superfluous.

One who advocates the resort to force must present an overwhelmingly powerful argument. There is ample reason to adopt as a guiding principle the restriction on use of force, now codified in law, to self-defense against armed attack. In fact, the official claim always was that the U.S. was defending South Vietnam from “aggression from the North.” Internal documents were more honest. Immediately after the Geneva accords of 1954, the U.S. undertook to help its clients “to defeat local Communist subversion or rebellion not constituting armed attack,” with potential “use of U.S. military forces either locally or against the external source of such subversion or rebellion” — all as determined unilaterally by the U.S. It was the secret plan that was pursued; the official defense is no less ludicrous than the assumption.

The U.S. at once installed a client regime in South Vietnam that abrogated the terms of the Geneva settlement and initiated a program of repression and massacre. When resistance ensued, the U.S. turned to direct military action by 1962 and an outright invasion of South Vietnam in 1965. Government analysts never doubted that the South Vietnamese enemy was the only mass-based political force, while the regimes the U.S. imposed as a basis for its intervention had negligible support. The peace treaty signed but immediately undermined by the U.S. in January 1973 was virtually a paraphrase, in essentials, of the program of the South Vietnamese forces that the U.S. was dedicated to destroy.

By the time the first North Vietnamese battalion was detected in the South — more than two months after the initiation of the systematic bombing of the North and the far more extensive bombing of the South — more than 150,000 South Vietnamese had been killed “under the crushing weight of American armor, napalm, jet bombers and, finally, vomiting gases.” This is the judgment of Bernard Fall, a committed hawk, who turned against the war because he feared that “Vietnam as a cultural and historic entity… is threatened with extinction” as “the countryside literally dies under the blows of the… (American)… military machine.” The U.S. won its filthy war in South Vietnam, decimating the local forces that resisted American violence and the peasant society in which they were rooted, thus guaranteeing North Vietnamese dominance of the wreckage and leaving ample opportunity for the hypocrites who now bewail the consequences of the American war that they supported.

Now we are asked whether opposition to the U.S. attack on rural South Vietnam, later all Indochina, was legitimate, in the light of postwar suffering and atrocities that are in large measure a result of this aggression. With comparable logic, Germans might have asked whether opposition to Nazi aggression should be reconsidered after the massacre of tens of thousands in France under American civil-military rule.

We are sometimes told that “the story is more complex.” That is true; the real world is more complex than our descriptions, a fact that may be exploited by the cynical or deluded. They can dismiss as a guide to attitude and action the salient features of this real but too complex world.

Like most colonial wars, the U.S. war in Indochina was in part a civil conflict, though in scale and savagery the U.S. intervention has had few historical parallels. Such wars are generally brutal, and the domestic losers often suffer grievously. Those who devoted themselves to ending American aggression and who now work to reverse the inhuman policy of refusing reparations or even aid to its victims have a moral right to condemn repressive acts of the regimes that have arisen from the ruins. Comparably, anti-Nazi resisters had the moral right to condemn the atrocities committed after liberation. Others may well be accurate in their condemnation, but it reeks to high heaven.

The American media have been deluged with denunciations of postwar Indochina, while more favorable accounts, however credible, receive little notice; and murderous repression within the American sphere — in Timor or Uruguay, for example — is consistently ignored. That should not surprise us. As had been predicted, a major effort is underway to reconstruct the interventionist ideology that eroded as popular opposition to the Vietnam war developed. History must be rewritten and principle revised to to conform to the needs of a power that will be called upon to lead the industrial capitalist world in the “North-South” conflict. We read that we must overcome our “Vietnam hang-up” and be willing to use force to defend our interests, often disguised in cynical humanitarian rhetoric. Or we are informed that revolutionary regimes are capable of great brutality, as has been obvious for centuries, and that “we” should rise to the defense of peoples, not states; reasonable enough (and no less familiar) if the term “we” refers to individuals, though it is easily transmuted to refer to state power in a new version of colonialist doctrine.

One who protests barbarism or repression must consider the probable human consequences of his acts. That is why, for example, Amnesty International urges that one write politely to the most miserable tyrant. Unless the goal of protest is self-aggrandizement or service to one’s state, finite energies will be distributed in accordance with a likely impact. A Russian who condemns American behavior in Vietnam or Chile may speak the truth, but we do not admire his courage or moral integrity. Similar considerations apply here. The central responsibility for Americans is to try to modify policies that we can influence; primarily those of the American government and its client regimes, or elsewhere, when there is a likelihood that protest can contribute to the relief of human misery.

Returning to the specific questions of this symposium: events in postwar Indochina amply reinforce the moral imperative of protest and resistance against the American war. Principled opponents of that war should now devote themselves with no less energy to attempting to heal its wounds and help its victims — those in exile, those who are oppressed, and those who are struggling to construct a viable society from the ruins left by American terror. If honest inquiry reveals terror and repression, protest is legitimate. One who undertakes it must ask how his acts may help those who suffer, bearing in mind also the domestic consequences and the fate of future victims of the interventionist ideologies now being reconstructed. One will of course win acclaim in the West by joining the chorus of protest focused on those who have escaped the Western orbit, but for ugly reasons. It is easy to avoid these considerations, but an honest person with true human concern will not lightly do so. Individuals may differ in their assessment of these complex issues, but they deserve more careful attention than they often receive. We cannot escape the world in which we live, inconvenient though that fact may be.

https://chomsky.info/19780626/

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

Let's ignore the understanding of how being a 'blog' is actually as irrelevant to the validity of the said site as being a '.com' is vs '.net' or whatever you like.

Here let's explain something more to you to understand how the names began to separate:

Psychopaths are psycho...logically pushed by their brain's structure and biochemistry to feel less in general and are 'stone-cold' gangstas to the bone even if they are law enforcement by profession as opposed to 'gangster'.

Sociopaths are socio...logically pushed by upbringing and either/both abuse and/or neglect from their parents/guardians as well as any peers they consider to be an authority in their life (usually much more the father figure than the mother because harsh mothers tend to make people become nicer, anyways).

Conservanazi(487) Clarified
1 point

Are we to take the word of webmd and psychcentral or mentalfloss

PsychCentral is a blog. I quoted Wikipedia and several other sites you lying little cunt. I have provided at least three or four quotes from valid sources supporting my argument so stop being a pointless imbecile. You have once again been busted for pretending to know what you are talking about. You Google something and assume the first website you find is going to tell you everything you need to know, and the reason you do that is because you're a MORON.

2 points

The Khmer Rouge – (Cambodian communists) who ruled Cambodia for four years – provide insight into why Marxists believed it necessary and moral to massacre so many of their fellow humans. Their Marxism was married to absolute power. They believed without a shred of doubt that they knew the truth, that they would bring about the greatest human welfare and happiness, and that to realize this utopia, they had to mercilessly tear down the old feudal or capitalist order and Buddhist culture, and then totally rebuild a communist society. Nothing could be allowed to stand in the way of this achievement. Government – the Communist Party – was above any law. All other institutions, religions, cultural norms, traditions and sentiments were expendable.

1 point

http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/10/ted-kennedy-secretly-asked-the-soviets-to-intervene-in-the-1984-elections/

If these progressives want to know what actual treason looks like, they should consult liberal lion Ted Kennedy, who not only allegedly sent secret messages to the Soviets in the midst of the cold war, he also begged them to intervene in a U.S. presidential election in order to unseat President Ronald Reagan. That’s no exaggeration.

According to Soviet documents unearthed in the early 1990’s, Kennedy literally asked the Soviets, avowed enemies of the U.S., to intervene on behalf of the Democratic party in the 1984 elections. Kennedy’s communist communique was so secret that it was not discovered until 1991, eight years after Kennedy had initiated his Soviet gambit.

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. “The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations,” the memorandum stated. “These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.”

You got some problems there AL LMMFAO !

It left in its wake an economic, environmental, social and cultural disaster.

No, it produced the most powerful economy and culture on Earth. The Cold War was what caused the disaster, clearly evidenced by the fact it happened 70 years later.

Whoever you are quoting, it is typically false American revisionist bullshit.

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

Are we to take the word of webmd and psychcentral or mentalfloss, wikipedia and an article in psychologytoday that doesn't fully deny what I said but explains that originally, the names began to separate once they realised that what they first identified as 'psychopath' was actually a 'sociopath' because there was a much more careful and disciplined form of the 'psychopath' that would become the term 'psychopath' once they made the one prone to impulsivity named sociopath?

1 point

Crazy AL this a Constitutional Republic and your denial shows your stupidity !

1 point

In total, Marxist regimes murdered nearly 110 million people from 1917 to 1987. For perspective on this incredible toll, note that all domestic and foreign wars during the 20th century killed around 35 million. That is, when Marxists control states, Marxism is more deadly then all the wars of the 20th century, including World Wars I and II, and the Korean and Vietnam Wars.

And what did Marxism, this greatest of human social experiments, achieve for its poor citizens, at this most bloody cost in lives? Nothing positive. It left in its wake an economic, environmental, social and cultural disaster.

Tell me something good about Marxism ??????

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

No, you are not welcome in my debate.

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

https://psychcentral.com/blog/differences-between-a-psychopath-vs-sociopath/

Traits of a Psychopath

Psychology researchers generally believe that psychopaths tends to be born — it’s likely a genetic predisposition — while sociopaths tend to be made by their environment. (Which is not to say that psychopaths may not also suffer from some sort of childhood trauma.) Psychopathy might be related to physiological brain differences. Research has shown psychopaths have underdeveloped components of the brain commonly thought to be responsible for emotion regulation and impulse control.

Psychopaths, in general, have a hard time forming real emotional attachments with others. Instead, they form artificial, shallow relationships designed to be manipulated in a way that most benefits the psychopath. People are seen as pawns to be used to forward the psychopath’s goals. Psychopaths rarely feel guilt regarding any of their behaviors, no matter how much they hurt others.

But psychopaths can often be seen by others as being charming and trustworthy, holding steady, normal jobs. Some even have families and seemingly-loving relationships with a partner. While they tend to be well-educated, they may also have learned a great deal on their own.

When a psychopath engages in criminal behavior, they tend to do so in a way that minimizes risk to themselves. They will carefully plan criminal activity to ensure they don’t get caught, having contingency plans in place for every possibility.

Psychopath Pop Culture Examples: Dexter, Anton Chigurh in No Country for Old Men, Henry in Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, Patrick Bateman in American Psycho

-----

Traits of a Sociopath

Researchers tend to believe that sociopathy is the result of environmental factors, such as a child or teen’s upbringing in a very negative household that resulted in physical abuse, emotional abuse, or childhood trauma.

Sociopaths, in general, tend to be more impulsive and erratic in their behavior than their psychopath counterparts. While also having difficulties in forming attachments to others, some sociopaths may be able to form an attachment to a like-minded group or person. Unlike psychopaths, most sociopaths don’t hold down long-term jobs or present much of a normal family life to the outside world.

When a sociopath engages in criminal behavior, they may do so in an impulsive and largely unplanned manner, with little regard for the risks or consequences of their actions. They may become agitated and angered easily, sometimes resulting in violent outbursts. These kinds of behaviors increase a sociopath’s chances of being apprehended.

Sociopath Pop Culture Examples: The Joker in The Dark Knight, JD in Heathers, Alex Delarge in A Clockwork Orange

1 point

Stop crying you Little Gurl and really stop crying about bullies because your media embarrasses that mindset !

Conservanazi(487) Clarified
1 point

“They’re skilled actors whose sole mission is to manipulate people for personal gain,” Tompkins says.

Sociopaths are less able to play along.

LOL. Right bro. The difference between psychopaths and sociopaths is their acting ability. For example Tom Cruise is a shit actor, and hence only qualifies as a sociopath.

WHY ARE YOU SO STUPID?

From the late 1920s American psychologist George E. Partridge influentially narrowed the definition of psychopathy to antisocial personality, and from 1930 suggested that a more apt name for it would be sociopathy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historyofpsychopathy

Mingiwuwu(630) Clarified
1 point

'Cold-Hearted Psychopath, Hot-Headed Sociopath'

It’s not easy to spot a psychopath. They can be intelligent, charming, and good at mimicking emotions. They may pretend to be interested in you, but in reality, they probably don’t care.

“They’re skilled actors whose sole mission is to manipulate people for personal gain,” Tompkins says.

Sociopaths are less able to play along. They make it plain that they’re not interested in anyone but themselves. They often blame others and have excuses for their behavior.

Some experts see sociopaths as “hot-headed.” They act without thinking how others will be affected.

Psychopaths are more “cold-hearted” and calculating. They carefully plot their moves, and use aggression in a planned-out way to get what they want. If they’re after more money or status in the office, for example, they’ll make a plan to take out any barriers that stand in the way, even if it’s another person’s job or reputation.

https://www.webmd.com/g00/mental-health/ features/sociopath-psychopath-difference?

1 point

http://www.projectrepublictoday.com/2018/07/16/cnn-shock-cnn-analyst-philip-mudd-when-will-shadow-government-rise-against-trump/

CNN analyst and former CIA intelligence official Philip Mudd wondered aloud Monday when a shadow government will emerge to oppose President Donald Trump following a joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland.

Is this what Leftist desire a Shadow Government to undermine the voting process ?????

1 point

I have a high level of understanding of psychiatry to levels you cannot fathom Nom and can tell you that the two are extremely different.

The psychopath is much more inclined to end up running the prison gang he/she finds himself/herself in if they are bound to be in the prison for a long time. The sociopath is one of the single most prone to become the dog on the leash for the psychopath. They are almost the total opposite in where they end up and people think that psychopaths are the more violent or impulsive and overall they can be but it's rare.

Stalin was a full blown psychopath whereas Hitler was a hybrid psychopath/sociopath. Trump is a hybrid whereas Putin is pure psychopath. If you don't see the difference that's fine but I have actually talked to real professors of psychiatry and had deep discussions which ended with them impressed.

Listen to the LFNJ Phillip Mudd call out for a Shadow Government to evolve !

Oh LOOK! Hillbilly Outlaw snapped a string on his banjo again and now he wants to talk politics. Isn't it cute?

Bless.

I would be open to the idea that it's factmachine imitating you but since you(conservanazi) are playing the role of brontoraptor imitating nom despite really being nom which then resulted in bronto taking Conservenazi ('e' instead of 'a') to imitate you imitating him imitating you, it all has become quite a joke.

You kind of lost me in the middle there, but yeah, I agree.

1 point

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7i0P44hgD4

Listen to the LFNJ Phillip Mudd call out for a Shadow Government to evolve !

What was said by Mudd is what you Radical Leftist pray for a 3rd World Country because your party has no message and cannot win elections. Not an arguable point Little Gurl

She's more psychopathic than sociopathic but I won't go into the details because most people think sociopaths are the more cautious of the two (totally wrong).

A psychopath is the same thing as a sociopath. The latter replaced the former as a means of describing this type of patient.

It really annoys me when people pretend to know what they are talking about.

Many forensic psychologists, psychiatrists and criminologists use the terms sociopathy and psychopathy interchangeably.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/ wicked-deeds/201401/how-tell-sociopath-psychopath

How is it not human if it has human characteristics, and comes from a human?

Because it has not developed into a human yet. For example it has no central nervous system and feels no physical pain.

1 point

I never said I was god and I do not strive to become her. Her and I are different and she adores me for my ways and has taught me a lot since the alien demigods taught me lessons (she via them spoke to me).

1 point

She's more psychopathic than sociopathic but I won't go into the details because most people think sociopaths are the more cautious of the two (totally wrong).

She's also much deeper and more thought-out within her own creation than the pure randomness you portray. The randomness is in herself not in what she creates alone, she gives system to it because she is randomly prone to enjoy some logic.

1 point

Yes it’s a fetus

Yes, a human fetus.

A fetus

I think you misunderstand, I mean what kind of fetus if you say it's not human. Is it an alien?

No , I mea;a potential human being , it’s hardly the finished article

How is it not human if it has human characteristics, and comes from a human?

Because it’s aborted which is not deemed murder

Well, when it's aborted, the fetus' life is ended. How? Well, it gets killed by a person. It's basically legal murder.

I understand it perfectly ,of course it terminates the pregnancy isn’t that what we are talking about ?

Yes

So that’s a no then

That's confirmation that you're a boring fucking retard who doesn't listen when he's told something repeatedly and shown evidence to corroborate it. You're a pathetic fucking clown with nothing intelligent to say on any topic. Literally all you do is use your own lies as a basis to attack people. You're a worthless fucking prick with no joy in his life.

Well no you’re the stupid one

No, you are definitely the stupid one. Trust me.

arguing for 4 days now over where North and South are

I have never argued where North and South are on this website, ever, and I don't know how many times you need to have this explained to you. Are you fucking autistic?

Oh you big meany

Truth isn't mean bro. It's just truth. Even your dead mother hated you, and I don't blame her. You are absolutely worthless and have no redeeming qualities as a human being. Your very existence is predicated on the need to cause pain in others. It's sad and I genuinely feel sorry for you because we both know you act the way you do because of the pain you feel inside that you are so talentless, ugly and stupid.

1 point

I would be open to the idea that it's factmachine imitating you but since you(conservanazi) are playing the role of brontoraptor imitating nom despite really being nom which then resulted in bronto taking Conservenazi ('e' instead of 'a') to imitate you imitating him imitating you, it all has become quite a joke.

I know exactly who is who and that there are three fundamental trolls here who branch into a variety of accounts and sure I may have mistaken a genuine user for one of you three along the way but either way don't think for a second that just because the rest are confused that you're sophisticated trolls. I can fake any persona to degrees you cannot imagine but don't wish to get banned again by Andy is all.

1 point

It's now clear to any sane patriotic American that Trump is a traitor.

There's every reason to believe that we're at a tipping point and the inevitable fall of Trump has finally begun and since we know that the bigger they are the harder they fall, this will be one for the ages.

I can only hope that the GOP and the radicalized fascist bowel movement that took it over will never recover.

Is that above insane statement going to make the Blue Wave happen in 2018 ? LMAO

2 points

Oh Jesus you're so boring.

So that’s a no then

Nobody gives a fuck about your alternative reality you stupid ugly moron.

Well no you’re the stupid one arguing for 4 days now over where North and South are , sorry to burst your bubble yet again but I’m

every woman’s dream ...... Bet you’ve a face like a badgers ring piece

What a truly pathetic cunt.

So you still haven’t worked out the North / South thing got ya

Even your own mother couldn't wait to die just so she could get away from you.

Oh you big meany ...... Get back to me when you resolve your North / South “ dispute “

The Federalist?

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Oh Outlaw, that's a good one. Quote some Daily Stormer for us bro.

Conservanazi(487) Clarified
1 point

The hat is important to him, because it's part of his religion.

Ex Con wears one too, but it's part of his DNA.

Are you denying science?

Jew hater.

1 point

http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/10/ted-kennedy-secretly-asked-the-soviets-to-intervene-in-the-1984-elections/

According to Soviet documents unearthed in the early 1990’s, Kennedy literally asked the Soviets, avowed enemies of the U.S., to intervene on behalf of the Democratic party in the 1984 elections. Kennedy’s communist communique was so secret that it was not discovered until 1991, eight years after Kennedy had initiated his Soviet gambit.

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. “The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations,” the memorandum stated. “These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.”

Was the Demorat a Soviet Fan Boy ??????? LMMFAO


1.25 of 8 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]