He's becoming part of the history already , and according to the past it is best to left them along as it is , besides killing them won't resurrect all those victims they've killed .
Say , you want them to answer their crime ? Alright , but to whom they answer to ?
Most people who anticipated world war II were dying out anyway , and it's not their fault that their leaders wants to wage this war (Like , they're soldiers and the only thing they can do is to follow orders) .
There was once me and my friends were evading some patrols in the school , and we hid in a public toilet and wait for things to cool down , then we found out there's a couple making out ... then suddenly one of the patrols point his flashlight at us but we were fast enough to dodge it though (damn I literary hit the deck and got dirt all over) .
After the patrols left we just sitting next to the stairs and eat our dinner calmly while the couple continues with their little "adventure" ...
Yes because you can do more on a landmass than on an island . Japanese used to reclaim the sea to expand .
As for economic powerhouses yes we used to be until political infighting started , now we're just a small island being manipulated by China and the USA , and our government can't do anything because they're just fighting each other , I'll give you a example showing how weak they are .
Filipinos have been harassing (even killing) our fishing boat and arrest them so they can ransom but our government didn't go aggressive instead they just paid the money and pretend it never happened (the same goes to dealing with china and japan) , now their crime is unmasked so they've decided to play stupid with us while the "U.S of A" is backing them by calming the situation and china is on our side (how ironic , but I can guess their intention) , what's even more worse is our government still does nothing like they did all these years (15 years at least I heard) , now you know how incompetent our government is .
And speaking about irony , the U.S demands others not to have nukes while they've got hundreds of them .
So it's not like I support any countries that easily I just simply want to ignore everything else about a country so I chose my opinion based on its land size , you gotta admit bigger lands have more space , and more space means more possibilities (that is , when you're done imagining it and want to create it) .
My point isn't the war , it's about how ugly the history was .
There is absolutely no history starts and ends in a fine way , for instance you started a group with nothing then you work hard and become stronger then eventually you'll need to expand by all means , here you'll see the problem , if someone is in your way during the expedition you'll definitely drive them out , and to think you want to avoid more trouble you'll probably just wipe them all out and that's where it starts to go down .
And I chose them simply because their lands is to hard to miss on the map also if you look at my profile you'll notice I'm Taiwanese not American , I live on a small island which is not the actual size you found on the globe .(right next to china)
This small island I'm living was once colonized by Japanese , Hollander and Spanish , and they end up tailing back to their lands , yes I hate Americans but they aided us in the past and now we're paying for it by buying their outdated weapons with their ridiculous prices , not to mention they confiscated our nukes long ago and now we have nothing to reinforce our standpoint thus getting bullied by everyone so how history is good since it progressed from the beginning ?
History only told us you either die to stop the suffering right now or you live to see it continuing in the future .
"People who shoot other people shot them with guns."
People don't really need guns to shoot , anything ranged will do .
"People who didn't shoot other people, didn't have guns."
How can you be sure ?
There are others who use different ranged weapons like bows , and people who does have guns doesn't really have to use it .
Guns fire bullets and bullets kill , guns without bullets don't fire unless you want to pistol whip someone to death .
Clearly there's no answer to this because we can define whatever we want .
It's all in our mind , saving the puppet from the well may be a good thing because you want it to live to see the wonders of the world , but it might also be a bad thing because the world is dangerous .
For instance , the puppy is dying on the road , one can take pity on it and help it but one can also scorn it and left it there , it's just an standard measured by your own mind for the individual .
As for the "better" answer it's just controlled by the majority , helping people by donating is good because the majority says so , helping people can also be good by killing them because the majority says so , majority holds the most of the things and that's why people stand together , if you aren't sure about the choice you'd stick to the majority , because it encourages/enforces/comforts you to make the decision no matter it's truly "Good" or "Bad" .
Do you mean use guns without bullets ? Like "gun kata" or something ?
If bullets are included then no , it's not fair and it conflicts MMAs purpose of fighting unarmed .
The purpose of martial arts is to defeat your enemy with your mind , body , and the unarmed techniques you've learned without the use of any weapons .
