- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
I support the abolition of all religion. You however, only support the abolition of religions other than your own
You think only "non-religious" systems should be tolerated.
You are denouncing others for openly doing what you inadvertantly do.
You seem to fancy your brand of intolerance somehow better because you take issue with even more groups (except yours). Wise up
I'm flattered that you spent time investigating me and sharing your suspicions. Here's a hot tip: If you really want to get someones perspective, ask questions without including personal attacks.
I am interested in the fiscal/monetary policies implemented by his regime.
Had I thougbt your question was asked in good faith I might have had more to say. (Smirks)
So you think white people should embrace race based tribalism and stop feeling responsible concerning the well being of those who aren't "us"?
BTW I have a controversial opinion about certain ethnic groups being considered rightful owners of certain portions of our earth. Might be interesting to debate.
A more reasonable description of knowledge is:
The information (however erroneous or useful) accessible to one or more agents.
Viewing knowledge as "justified true belief" sets us up to view portions of the information we manage as errorless and our thinking becomes more rigid and dogmatically absolutist. Instead of saying "I have justified true beliefs" its better to say "I think I have adequate information".
No. I believe those strories were what some people found inspiring and chose to canonize. My religion is syncretic and has been influenced by various faiths. I think yours is too, but you are so committed to anti-religion rhetoric it would be difficult to get you to admit it.
Not that I even buy in to viewing through the overly simplistic left/right lens, but I think many of the people that you say "support the Religion of Islam" arent concerned at all with doctrinal advocacy but with defense of a group of PEOPLE that is being demonized much like the Jews were in Nazi Germany
We recognize how genocide is worked up to througb rhetoric and we're trying to counter the trend
Tell you what ask any question you want about my religious beliefs. I will answer with complete candor. Stop any time you find a "delusional" belief. If you don't find any, I will consider the debate title/description disproven. You can continue thinking being opposed to religion in general is smart, and I will keep thinking it's smarter to take an "improve religion" approach.
I suppose earlier events in the chain of events that lead to the emergence of life involved much simpler chemical reactions that didn't involve greatly complex molecules. I suspect that some form of sustained combustion was the precursor to what later became metabolism.. I understand that I may have gone too far back for anyone to find my argument compelling, but do you really doubt that certain types of fire were intrinsically involved in what became life?
Since lying is a thing for you, Im not sure what nation you're from, but I do know you are part of an international multicultural group who is bent on spewing rhetoric that helps efforts to demonize "The West" Islam and whole nations so that violence and loss of freedom results. Are you proud of the role you play in drumming up mass hate?