CreateDebate


Atypican's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Atypican's arguments, looking across every debate.
atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

Denies = Does not allow

Inhabitants=the people living within the territory in question

You do see that the debate "Title" and "Description" are meant to be combined as one statement right?

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

I was purposefully not specific about the government I had in mind, the basic right I had in mind and the type of parasitism I had in mind because I want to see if someone can refute the general principle

1 point

I give it by default. Someone has to do something to lose my respect before I will stop giving it.

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

I support the abolition of all religion. You however, only support the abolition of religions other than your own

IF

You think only "non-religious" systems should be tolerated.

THEN

You are denouncing others for openly doing what you inadvertantly do.

You seem to fancy your brand of intolerance somehow better because you take issue with even more groups (except yours). Wise up

1 point

I'm flattered that you spent time investigating me and sharing your suspicions. Here's a hot tip: If you really want to get someones perspective, ask questions without including personal attacks.

I am interested in the fiscal/monetary policies implemented by his regime.

Had I thougbt your question was asked in good faith I might have had more to say. (Smirks)

1 point

You seem seduced by the very sort of rhetoric that inspires people to designate overly large groups of people as "the enemy". You have seemingly at least, become part of the problem.

1 point

So you think white people should embrace race based tribalism and stop feeling responsible concerning the well being of those who aren't "us"?

BTW I have a controversial opinion about certain ethnic groups being considered rightful owners of certain portions of our earth. Might be interesting to debate.

1 point

So you think your culture, (by virtue of the superiority you suppose it has) should enjoy rights that others do not?

Must tribalism involve considering other groups generally inferior?

1 point

A more reasonable description of knowledge is:

The information (however erroneous or useful) accessible to one or more agents.

Viewing knowledge as "justified true belief" sets us up to view portions of the information we manage as errorless and our thinking becomes more rigid and dogmatically absolutist. Instead of saying "I have justified true beliefs" its better to say "I think I have adequate information".

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

No. I believe those strories were what some people found inspiring and chose to canonize. My religion is syncretic and has been influenced by various faiths. I think yours is too, but you are so committed to anti-religion rhetoric it would be difficult to get you to admit it.

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

You don't see terrorism as a type of militancy ?

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

All these atrocities and more were committed overwhelmingly by militant men who are not committed to non-violence. Should we round them up and incarcerate them?

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

Clowned again by badass Outlaw60 Ouch!

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

I apologize for disputing the letter while knowingly agreeing with the spirit of what you were getting at. It's cheap oneupmanship and I am ashamed to admit I am sometimes guilty of it.

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

Not that I even buy in to viewing through the overly simplistic left/right lens, but I think many of the people that you say "support the Religion of Islam" arent concerned at all with doctrinal advocacy but with defense of a group of PEOPLE that is being demonized much like the Jews were in Nazi Germany

We recognize how genocide is worked up to througb rhetoric and we're trying to counter the trend

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

Well aren't you a breath of fresh air :)

1 point

We can classify people according to anything they have in common. So if we view everyone in the world who oppresses others as a class, what does this make of what you assert in the debate description?

1 point

Tell you what ask any question you want about my religious beliefs. I will answer with complete candor. Stop any time you find a "delusional" belief. If you don't find any, I will consider the debate title/description disproven. You can continue thinking being opposed to religion in general is smart, and I will keep thinking it's smarter to take an "improve religion" approach.

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

Clues me in to your approximate age...but I will give you credit for being ahead of the curve in terms of the depth and complexity of arguments you can make, digest and respond to with remarkable cogency

1 point

I suppose earlier events in the chain of events that lead to the emergence of life involved much simpler chemical reactions that didn't involve greatly complex molecules. I suspect that some form of sustained combustion was the precursor to what later became metabolism.. I understand that I may have gone too far back for anyone to find my argument compelling, but do you really doubt that certain types of fire were intrinsically involved in what became life?

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

Some people are so dim witted that they don't even realize they are terrorism

propagandists. Fortunately I doubt anyone values your opinion.

atypican(4873) Clarified
1 point

Since lying is a thing for you, Im not sure what nation you're from, but I do know you are part of an international multicultural group who is bent on spewing rhetoric that helps efforts to demonize "The West" Islam and whole nations so that violence and loss of freedom results. Are you proud of the role you play in drumming up mass hate?

atypican(4873) Clarified
0 points

Oh look you have an opinion about me that you want to share. How cute.

1 point

I agree wholeheartedly with both posts on the other side. Though I think Conor would win under MMA rules, there is a very good chance he is going to really get clowned under boxing rules. If so I suspect it will be bad for MMA overall and good for boxing


1 of 146 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]