- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Man you are just as coherent as lool...
He said that churches exist so people can generate income through donations that just went into other peoples pockets. I was saying that the bible is not made solely for profit, as more than 95% of its sales are donated to charities etc.
By encouraging young people to have sex at an early age we expose them to a myriad of potential risks. Contraception is not always effective, and can result in unwanted pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases.
Legalising the prescription of contraception will not prevent the problem of teenage pregnancy. This is not due to a lack of prescribed contraception, but to other factors such as inadequate sex education, a lower age of sexual maturity, etc. Young girls are far more likely to use condoms than birth control especially when these girls are under the age of 16.
The issue of the health of the girl must also be considered. We are yet unsure of the potential harmful effects of the birth control pill in women. Is it not irresponsible to prescribe this to young girls who are still experiencing puberty before we are fully aware of the dangers?
Second chance? I don't remember a second chance and as far as I'm concerned you are just taking away people that could actually know more on the topic at hand than you do. I do not doubt, I know, that you are way above me in the experience and knowledge of stuff that a 19 year old couldn't possibly know. But I know that there are some topics that I have a ton of knowledge on, but if you are going to ban me from your debates go for it there are quite a few others and I don't mind I just find it a little strange I haven't down voted anybody since the debate, its not worth it anymore.
what if you are taking away an extremely good point? You are taking away an opinion that hasn't had a chance. If someone gets nasty with you during a debate by all means ban them but I do not see the point in doing so before hand. As the debate creator you should give everyone a chance, at least a chance in every debate to prove themselves a good debater. Who knows maybe what your debate is on that person wrote on for his phd you could be taking away an opinion changing post!
I strongly say that they should not. I find it very stupid. To ban someone who is 'off subject' or 'bad mouthing' is perfectly acceptable but to take away what could be the top scoring debate post is just wrong. Everyone should be entitled to their own opinion on the site and if they cannot post their opinion what is the point?
Hey man if you are that good at water polo I have to say tough it out, especially if it is your ticket into college. If you cannot play at all anyway then I would say just get the MRI. But if your knee is not affecting your game play then I would say go for the gold ( scholarship ).
I have had the thought run through my head my I quickly shake the though disgusted with myself.
If you are fantasizing about killing people a lot maybe it is time to seek help, but if this is just your imagination at work then let it roam freely.
Murder always has consequences. If you succeed in alluding the police you cannot allude your mind or your conscience it is always there.
I would have to say the series Phillip Pullman put out ' His Dark Materials ' I got it for Christmas 2 years ago and I was thinking I'm 16 why would I want to read a series for young adults ( not exactly my taste ) and it turned out that they were all fantastic reads that I finished in a matter of 2 days.
Some students are not as enthralled to go to school as you are Frenchieak.
Just go to summer school. I know I start to get drowsy by 7th period. Think about having a lengthened class ( maybe one that you do not like ).
What about other kids that have jobs that they have to go to after school? How many employers are going to just give lenience to kids when they have a line of other would be employees that can be there at 4 o'clock on the dot every day that need the money?
It would mess up everyones schedule. Kids are in school long enough. An idea that was never picked up was the idea that we have 1 week of school off a month and cut out summer vacation.
Having students stay longer in school only makes them want to sleep and not pay attention to a higher degree. Kids are already half asleep by the end of the day. It would just be a bad idea.
Why wouldn't I? It wouldn't matter to me if I got great recognition just as long as what I did really did save the Human race. If what I did was just an attempt to save the human race and might not work I dont think so. Have some crazy people try it out first.