Yeah, that's the problem buddy that you analyse everything from point of view of theology and it's the religion which sets the rules. now set rules according to science we'll know what is morally right or wrong including you.

Why not? i mean first of all we have to go through the basic of this debate viz. "morality". the landscape of morality which we see, follow and on which we analyse today had been defined a long ago by theology. so we see everything from that point of view. let me ask some questions?

why don't we feel pain towards rocks while breaking them?

if we can reset the landscape of morality on the basis of science then i don't see why they cannot co-exist? does this mean couples will ask supercomputer to whether they want to have second child? then you didn't get it and that's not my fault.