CreateDebate


Excon's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Excon's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

You might, if prosecutors are right on a technicality and fighting it would ruin you and your family.

Hello again, A:

What? You don't think pleading guilty will ruin your life?? Dude!

Lemme make this suggestion to you... Criminal law is NOT based on technicalities... It's based on PROOF beyond a reasonable doubt.. I PROMISE you, that if Michael Flynn went to trial, and all the government had was a TECHNICALITY, he would have made MINCEMEAT out of 'em.. No jury in the world would convict an honorable general of lying on a technicality.. NONE!

Furthermore, IF the government had MADE me plead guilty in order to save my family, I would NEVER, EVER cooperate with them.. That's NEVER EVER...

Flynn didn't do that... He laid down for 'em.. No general I know would DO that UNLESS he was guilty as sin..

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

You don’t know where the beginning was. The beginning of a multi-million dollar investigation launched by groups known to have partisan actors concerned with an insurance policy against Trump. An investigation brought this to light.

If someone was willing to use intelligence and law enforcement resources in the hopes of removing your duly elected President, don’t you want to know about it?

Hello again, A:

The "groups" you speak of are the FBI.. You think they're partisan.. I don't.. Struck and Page texted about an "insurance policy", but there's NO proof that they DID anything about it.. There's no proof that they used anything for nefarious purposes..

Yes, I WOULD wanna know about it.. I'd subpoena them and grill 'em on LIVE TV.. I'd do it again, and again, and then even again.. There's NO proof the FBI, or the deep state, or Obama, or Clinton did anything nefarious..

Do you wanna investigate MORE??? You DO.. You're from investigate BENGHAZI for YEARS, and more years, and then even more, and you got BUPKUS..

I got a feeling, Trump is just gonna JAIL somebody BYPASSING every Constitutional protection we have, just to test the waters.. He wants to know just how much power he has...

He's EMBOLDENED.. He's DANGEROUS.

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

Do you know what they each said that was a lie?

Hello again, A:

Yes.. I AM impartial..

No, I don't know what they said.. What I DO know, is they pleaded GUILTY to it.. If I was innocent, I would NEVER, EVER plead guilty.. Manafort was FOUND guilty.. What else is there to KNOW about their lying?

Was the beginning of all this not the Steele dossier?

I dunno.

We're told the beginning was when drunk Populousness told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political dirt on Clinton, and HE called the FBI.

Your side says it's the dossier, or bad cops, or bad FISA warrants, or the deep state, and/or Clinton, unmaking people, and/or Obama tapping Trumps wires, or some shit like that..

excon

1 point

pretending to be a Jew months after your ancestry test has been debunked.

Hello science denier:

Debunked??? DEBUNKED?? DUDE! You're the fucking nutcase who says we invented a time machine.. DUDE!

Your whole fucking existence has been DEBUNKED.. DUDE!

excon, Jewish Prince

2 points

As for the rest, an investigation should be conducted to determine if the Trump-Collusion investigation was fabricated on knowingly false pretenses

Hello A:

I dunno.. It's NOT false that Flynn LIED about his contact with Russians.. It's NOT false that Manafort, Jared, Don, Jr, Gates, Sessions, Cohen and probably Stone LIED about their contact with the RUSSIANS..

If they did nothing wrong, WHY lie about it????

excon

1 point

What i quote SUPER STUPID comes not from my view but the view of your media !!!!

Hello poochy boy:

Sinclair Broadcasting owns KOMO TV. They're FOX News on STEROIDS. "It’s the most dangerous company you've never heard of,” said Michael Copps, the George W Bush-appointed former chairman of Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the top US broadcast regulator.

Seattle DOES have a homeless/opiate problem.. Sinclairs' recommendation is very Trumpian.. LOCK 'EM UP and THROW AWAY the key..

excon

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/aug/17/sinclair-news-media-fox-trump-white-house-circa-breitbart-news

Now fetch this stick.

excon

1 point

Hello:

Oh, and I forgot they wanna jail Adam Schiff, Jerold Nadler, Hillary Clinton and Obama.. If they COULD jail John McCain, they WOULD..

excon

1 point

If you knew you were innocent, would you obstruct the investigation?

Hello again, A:

I would do everything I could to defend myself, but I would NOT obstruct justice....

Maybe we're talking about two different things.. DEFENDING yourself is GOOD... OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE is NOT..

Would THREATENING witness's against me BE obstruction? It would. Would FIRING the prosecutor (if I could) to END the investigation BE obstruction? It WOULD. Would DANGLING pardons (if I could dangle 'em) in front of witness's against me BE obstruction?? It WOULD.

Would hiring a good lawyer and obeying the law BE obstruction?? No, it wouldn't..

excon

1 point

WHY does excon THINK he's a JEW when in REALITY he is just very, very, GAY

Hello hater:

Do you know what they call a gay Jew??? A heblew...

DUDE!!

excon

1 point

I’m not totally left - but I would applaud the end of the traditional dogmatic church

Hello S:

I don't disagree with you about the damage religion causes.. But, if it's gonna DIE, it has to die on its own.. FORCING it to go underground will DEFEAT the purpose.. In fact, making it illegal will give it penumbra of the forbidden fruit enhancing its desirability..

excon

1 point

If you understand that Trump didn’t collude, then surely he understood that too. Since he knew he didn’t collude, what would he have to obstruct?

Hello again, A:

I suggest there does NOT have to be an underlying crime in order to seek an obstruction of justice conviction..

To wit. This is what findlaw says:

The elements required for a conviction on an obstruction of justice charge differ slightly by code section. For instance, prosecutors must prove the following elements for a conviction under section 1503 of the federal statute (influencing or injuring an officer or juror):

There was a pending federal judicial proceeding;

The defendant knew of the proceeding; and

The defendant had corrupt intent to interfere with or attempted to interfere with the proceeding.

But regardless of the specific section of federal law (1501 through 1521) cited in a particular case, the prosecution need not prove any actual obstruction -- the defendant's attempt to obstruct is enough. The element of intent, which is central to such cases, is also usually the most difficult to prove; although memos, phone calls, and recorded conversations may be used as evidence to establish this.

https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/obstruction-of-justice.html

excon

0 points

Does Excon Need PROOF To Be Jewish

Hello hater:

I DON'T need proof because I don't have to prove shit to you.. Who the fuck are you??? Nonetheless, I present my DNA test.. In the world where I reside, DNA IS proof.

https://www.myheritage.com/dna/ethnicity/intro/D9R7CP1FCT9JGSRI5T87ACI8E1KMGH1LEKRNKM9BCDMNKQ3GE9JK4LAC6HD38R25F5SJ4DRPE50KUQ3ACL878JI2CD732GR2ED732MG?utm

excon

1 point

That would potentially create an absurd situation when an impeached President could sue members of Congress for deffamation and win.

Hello again, BO:

Who said that could happen?? Look.. I'm not suggesting that congress LIE in order to impeach him.. They could, for example, impeach him for receiving money from a foreigner.. The emolument clause of the Constitution, says he can't..

But, when the Saudis rent out entire FLOORS of Trumps hotel just down the block from the White House, SOME of that money winds up in Trumps pocket.. He COULD have divested himself of that property, but he WANTED to keep making money from it, and he HAS..

For that reason alone, he could be impeached, and Trump wouldn't be able to sue any member of congress for it.

excon

PS> (edited) The point I'm trying to make is impeachment in the House is POLITICAL and they can impeach him if they don't like the color of his tie..

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

But they do need to prove that.

Hello again, BO:

To who? Themselves???

To be clear, impeachment happens in the House.. The trial happens in the Senate.. Democrats run the House, so getting them to agree with themselves is the easy part.. To get the Republican Senate to convict is another.

The Mueller report didn't exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice charges.. It just said it didn't rise to the level of criminal behavior..

But, congress doesn't need proof of "criminal" behavior.. After all, what is proof of high crimes and misdemeanors???

As an originalist, I believe the WORDS as they are written. Since we have no classification in law for HIGH crimes, it means anything congress wants it mean.

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

They would need to present their case to a Judicial Committee

Hello again, A:

What are the elements of a case for high crimes and misdemeanors?? What would Judiciary Committee ruminate about? What would a prosecutor look into?

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

There is no statute for impeaching a President by means of "hate"

Hello BO:

Sure there is.. What do you think high crimes and misdemeanors are??

excon

2 points

But the Senate prosecutes it. How do you see that going?

Hello again, A:

One of my biggest disappointment in Trumps election, was the complete and total capitulation of the Republican congress.. They HATE him too, but FEAR him more..

Bongo boy wrote this morning that Trump is gonna seek REVENGE.. I believe it.. He's more dangerous now than he ever was..

Do I think that even ONE Republican Senator will stand up for America??? Sadly, no..

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

For example the lack of reasonable expectation that a firing would end an investigation, coupled with the fact that it didn’t end an investigation.

Hello again, A:

Couple things.. You talk about Trumps "reasonable expectation", as if you KNOW what he expected.. I say, by firing Comey, he had a "reasonable expectation" that the investigation would END.. Why is your assumption about his "expectation" any more valid than mine?

When he fired Comey, Trump didn't know that the investigation would continue. Nobody knew that a special council would be appointed.. Trump, like you, thought he could FIRE Comey for any reason.. And, since he had absolute authority to do it, both you and he were surprised when people took exception to it..

Let's talk about a branch of government that DOES have the authority to IMPEACH the president for ANY REASON AT ALL. Certainly, nobody knows what the hell high crimes and misdemeanors are.. Do you? That's on purpose, of course. It's a FEATURE of our Constitution - not a bug..

excon

1 point

Oh the firing. The problem with that is that removing Comey, for any reason at all, was Trump’s prerogative.

Hello again, A:

Nahh...

You say "for any reason at all" I say it's OBSTRUCTION if he fires him to END an investigation into himself.. But, I got it. We don't agree..

Let's look at his pardon power.. My guess is you'll say he can pardon anybody he wants to "for no reason at all".. I say, he can't accept a BRIBE in exchange for a pardon.. That would BE obstruction..

Conclusion: In my view, his UNLIMITED powers are indeed, LIMITED.

excon

1 point

Are Humans Born Evil?

Hello W:

Nahhh... To me, evil has religious connotations that don't apply in the real world.. People behave badly. Dogs behave badly. Dogs are no more evil than people are.

excon

2 points

Give me the instance in question

Hello A:

You've read the words.. I've read the words.. You conclude they mean one thing.. I conclude they mean another. Here they are:

And, in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said: ‘You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story'

I say the words mean Trump FIRED Comey to OBSTRUCT the investigation.. Tell me again, what you think they mean.

In any case, congress doesn't need proof beyond a reasonable doubt to impeach Trump.. They just need the VOTES..

Look.. I didn't like it when Clinton shook his finger at me and LIED through his teeth, and I don't like it when Trump does the same thing.. To me, LYING to the public IS an impeachable offense..

excon

1 point

The report is finally out

Hello joe:

It IS.. Good News.. Our president is NOT a traitor.. But, that DOESN'T mean he didn't behave badly - badly enough to be impeached.. Good thing you don't have to be a traitor in order to be impeached.

excon

1 point

The Civil War was not only, or even primarily, about slavery.

Hello marcus:

Yes, it was..

excon

1 point

I was in America last week visiting my family out in the country, and everywhere I went (besides seeing people gawk at my accent) I saw FOX News on the television. Here are my observations:

Hello mr.

That's easy.. You were IN the country. Outside of any major US city, FOX News prevails.. But, most people live IN the city.. City folk don't watch FOX much..

It's interesting that our physical divides mirror our political divides.

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
2 points

Not bad...are you the author ?

Hello BO:

Nahh.. It was written by John Gray, Cincinnati, Ohio.

excon

1 point

Is this just a day in the life of Joe middle class Republican?

Hello:

Joe Republican gets up at 6:00 AM and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards.

With his first drink of water, Joe swallows his morning medication. His medications are safe and effective because some stupid commie liberal fought for federal legislation to create the Food and Drug Administration, which ensures that medications are safe to take and work as advertised.

All but $10 worth of Joe’s medication is paid for by his employer's group medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for health benefits. Now Joe gets those benefits too.

Joe prepares his breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meatpacking industry.

In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. The bottle is properly labeled with a list of ingredients because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know what sort of chemicals he was putting on his body.

Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath of fresh air. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for the laws that stop industries from polluting our air.

Joe walks on the government-provided sidewalk to the subway station for his government-subsidized ride to work. He is able to save considerable money in parking and transportation costs because some dumb liberal fought for affordable public transportation, so that everyone can have the opportunity to contribute to our economy.

Joe begins his workday. He has a good job with excellent pay, health insurance, retirement pension, paid holidays and vacation, a safe workplace and a union contract protecting his right to continue receiving those benefits, all because some lazy liberal union members fought and died so Joe could enjoy these working standards.

If Joe is injured at work or gets laid off from his job, he'll receive a workers' compensation or unemployment check because some dumb liberal didn't think he should lose his house and end up homeless or in bankruptcy through no fault of his own, just because of a temporary financial setback.

It is Joe’s lunch hour. On his way out, he stops at the ATM to deposit his paycheck in the bank so he can pay some bills. Joe's bank account is federally insured by the FDIC, because some godless liberal wanted to protect Joe's hard-earned money from the unscrupulous speculators who ruined our banking system during the Great Depression.

Joe is paying off his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-market federally guaranteed student loan because some elitist liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his lifetime. Joe got his college degree from a state-funded public university at reduced tuition, because some commie pinko liberal decided that the advantages of higher education should be available to rich and poor alike.

Joe arrives home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at his home in the country. Joe gets in his car for the drive. His car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for automobile safety standards to go along with our taxpayer-funded roads and bridges.

Joe arrives at his father's house, where Joe spent his boyhood growing up. His was the third generation to live in the house, which was financed by the Farmers' Home Administration because the banking industry didn't want to make unprofitable rural loans in the 1930’s. The house had no electricity until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded rural electrification.

Joe greets his father, who has just arrived home from his place of worship. Joe's father is free to practice his faith openly and without fear, because a bunch of candy-ass liberals fought and died to defeat Nazism and Fascism and preserve our American way of life.

Joe's father is retired. He survives on Social Security, Medicare and a union retirement pension, all because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself, so Joe wouldn't have to.

Joe gets back in his car for the ride home. He tunes in his favorite right-wing radio call-in show. The talk show host explains to the listening audience that liberals are evil and conservatives are good. The host fails to mention that conservative Republicans have fought against every single one of the legal benefits and protections that Joe and his family have enjoyed throughout the day. Joe agrees: "We don't need those big-government liberals ruining our lives. After all, I'm a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of himself, just as I have."

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

the US has a Constitution which makes it impossible for a President to be a dictator.

Hello BO:

That assumes Trump OBEYS the Constitution... I don't make that same assumption.

excon

1 point

Aliya Sinha Jaipur Escort, Escorts Services in Jaipur

Hello Aliya:

Cool.. Send one to 2290 Ash Street in Denver.. Make sure she's good with happy endings..

excon

1 point

The jews are responsible for creating christianity and islam

Hello Jew hater:

So, Jewish Mary, and Jewish Joseph had a Jewish baby named Jesus.. Jewish Jesus started Christianity.. If you wanna say that the Jews are responsible for that, OK.

I dunno where Islam came from.

excon, Jewish Prince

1 point

Hello BO:

I call him poochy boy because he's like a pit bull.. Once he grabs onto your leg, he NEVER, EVER lets go..

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

I'm only here for the trigger words

Hello joe:

I'm here for the chicks...

excon

0 points

Liberals are more likely to be vegeterians

Hello joe:

Oh, no... Next you'll be telling us that they believe in climate change.. Dude!

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

My point is that some people in favor of keeping statues are not racist.

Hello again, A:

The civil war was a war about RACE.. If the statues of the generals who FOUGHT the war have HISTORICAL and CULTURAL significance, they should be displayed in museums.. That's where we display history and culture

However, if you think these statues should BE in the public square, you don't think that because of their historical significance.. You think that because you don't like how the war ABOUT race, ended..

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

There were also non-racists who didn’t want the statues removed.

Hello A:

I agree.. But, as a non racist myself, if I FOUND myself in a crowd of VIOLENTLY racist mother fuckers, I'd find ANOTHER way to protest the removal of these statues.

That they stood head and shoulders WITH the racists, means they'll get attacked WITH the racists..

It reminds me of a time back in 1968 when I was on the sidelines wearing my uniform protesting AGAINST the anti war PROTESTERS.. The cops ATTACKED the protesters, and didn't give a shit that I wasn't one of them.. The cops beat the shit out of me too..

Guess what side I was on when the NEXT antiwar march happened?

excon

1 point

Were you there when it all happened?

Hello again, BO:

What??? I have to BE there in order to report that it HAPPENED???

At Charlottesville, ANTIFA attacked Nazi motherfuckers, white supremacists, and pieces of shit KKK.. If some "fine" person found themselves marching WITH them, fuck 'em..

Were YOU there to see them attack peaceful protesters??

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

The left doesn't condemn Atifa even when shown evidence of their violent and criminal behaviour.

Hello again, BO:

ANTIFA was on MY side in Charlottesville.. I won't condemn them for that. I condemn them when they tear down my city every Mayday..

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

What did Trump say regarding Charlotsville events that was racially devisive

Hello BO:

I didn't distinguish "racial" divisiveness from just plain old divisiveness..

Speaking of the differences between the sides in Charlotsville, one must keep in mind that ONE side was white supremacists, KKK, and neo-nazis.. The OTHER side wasn't..

Trump said, there were "some VERY FINE people, on both sides"

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/08/trump-defends-white-nationalist-protesters-some-very-fine-people-on-both-sides/537012/

excon

1 point

While Republicans defend Jews, the left sits silent

Hello again, bront:

Right again.. You're on a roll. But, you're NOT gonna like my reasoning WHY that's so..

Truthfully, Republicans don't LOVE the Jews.. NOBODY loves the Jews, except the Jews..

Evangelical Republicans BELIEVE the only way the Rapture can happen is when the Jews gather themselves in the Middle East.. So, they WANT 'em to congregate in Israel.

But, when the Rapture DOES happen, NO JEWS will be allowed to ascend to heaven.. They'll have to convert first, or God will MURDER them..

So, they don't love the Jews.. They wanna USE the Jews. Truthfully, that ain't any better than out and out hatred..

excon

1 point

Free college? Why don't lib colleges start by giving them cheap college?

Hello bront:

I agree.

Like health care, getting educated USED to be affordable.. So, like heath care, education is going to get nationalized, so it can be affordable again.

excon

2 points

Study finds white liberals are white supremacists with guilty consciences

Hello again, bront:

Study, schmudy. I refer you to right wing Bongo boy, who's PROUD of his white supremacy, and right wing Poochy boy, who LOVES calling people niggers..

Left wingers don't do that.. NONE of us do..

Anything else??

excon

1 point

The brilliant kids at Yale lose to the Bumfuks at Louisiana State

Hello again, Bumfukian:

When you buck bales of hay every day, you're gonna get strong.. But, when the heaviest thing you lift is a book, you're gonna get smart..

excon

excon(10988) Clarified
1 point

My Bumfukian, uneducated ass

Hello bront:

Just remember to slather your Bumfukian uneducated ass with sun block.

excon

1 point

A Harvard study shows that the left is far more racist than the right

Hello bront:

Harvard, schmarvard.. FUCK Harvard.. All you need to do is look RIGHT HERE, on this very website.. We got the right wing bongo boy, and the right wing outlaw who LOVES calling people niggers.. Why don't you count THEM?

Left wingers DON'T do that.. NONE of us do.. Your side DOES.. Really... LOOK..

DUDE!

excon

0 points

Aren't the biggest universities in red area

Hello bront:

Biggest?? As in Jerry Falwell right wing propaganda U?

DUDE!

excon

1 point

In other words the Democrat Party holds onto the same position it has had for hundreds of years.

Hello bront:

Yes, we have.. WHY would we start acting like racist right wingers??

Look.. I LOVE the people of Bumfuk, and I wish them well in their medical billing careers.

excon

0 points

Hello Missfit:

Isn't saying bumfuk the same position Democrats held on blacks during the slave trade and Indians

BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK

BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK

BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK

BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK

BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK

BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK

BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK, BUMFUK

excon

0 points

Are American Liberals stupid?

Hello:

I dunno.. I've never heard of Bumfuk University. DUDE.

If you LOOK at a red and blue map, the BLUE areas have MAJOR colleges and universities.. The RED areas have medical billing schools..

DUDE!!

excon

0 points

who don't understand why you should look both ways before you cross the street.

Hello bront:

They GOT streets in Bumfuk?????

excon


1 of 138 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]