CreateDebate


Izazovnog's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Izazovnog's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Are you a theist, or an atheist? I will not respond untill you answer. If you are a thesist, what are your beleifs?

1 point

Actually, a group could be presuring you while running from a car.

2 points

Actually, they can. Remember, I am not arguing it is allway's harmful, I am arguing it is not allway's useful. Now, sopose a car is coming across the road, if you are under presure, you may fall over, and become unfocased, however, if you are not, you won't, and will dodge the car in time.

Another example is education, most people do better when not under presure.

Now please look at the debate topic.

1 point

Not exactly, the fittest does not win. Nor does the most psyically skilled win.

The one who wins, is who has the best mental capacity.

1 point

Sorry, but like it enough you are a thesist. You can not be a atheist. You would beleive in no diety. You are a theist because you believe in a diety.

1 point

Yes, a theist is the belief in any number of diety's. You are a theist.

izazovnog(322) Clarified
1 point

I wasn't intending to show my arguement. I wanted to avoid getting into a lengthy debate. I still go one this site, but I now spend more time on debate.org.

1 point

I personely supourt this side, however feel free to post your arguement

1 point

Yes, the man has still got himself drunk, and therefore the action comes from the wrong of the man.

Also, how is it sexist?

1 point

You may want to read your own comment. Make it more clear.

Now, the man is still guilty. He is to blame for getting himself drunk.

1 point

Read it again. It doesn't say if a drunk man has sex with a girl. It says if a man has sex with a drunk girl.

2 points

It would create a much better ballance between the poor and the rich. It would also save much material.

1 point

Natural talent can sometimes be a factor, but to be strong it involves hard work. To be intelligent, it involves practice.

1 point

Having a dog being apart the family isn't a very good idea. Pet's could not use the right's anyway.

Should we give them their own banks? No. They can't use them, they are better off when we pay for them.

Give me one good reason why they shouldn't be part of the family besides not doing certain things that we can do.

You say this because you know I have a very good reason.

Also keep in mind that a pet can protect your house from intruders and protects your family and the pet looks after you and your family. So if that doesnt sound like a family member, I dont know what does.

That is not being a part of the family. Some pet's attack anyone if you are intrested. If someone next door decides to protect you, is he a family member?

Now, it is you who has to explain. Why should dogs be legally treated as a part of a family? They do not need to be a part of a family to be treated well. If you wan't to sell a dog to someone else because you don't like it, what do you do? It is illegal to sell family members. So if you supourt this view, then animals should be wild.

1 point

Yes it is. Animals can't think like us, they can't use the rights.

Also, before you say 'yes, but it doesn't mean they shouldn't have respect' you must remember that the topic is about wherever or not pets should be treated as a part of the family.

And interestingly enough, pet's aren't so Innocent.

2 points

True equallity is giving both the woman and the Baby the right to life. If you was aborted, you would hate it.

izazovnog(322) Clarified
1 point

Is he a feminist? Look at his profile, it says male.

_

izazovnog(322) Clarified
1 point

Iv'e read it now. Now, according to the article it is possible. Although not 100%, but likley.

1 point

It would be very complicated to do that, the blood vessels, nerves e.c.t.

izazovnog(322) Clarified
1 point

If the fault is with the one who loves, and you say it is true, than you beleive that it is better to be loved, however, if you beleive it is false, then you beleive it is better to love.

izazovnog(322) Clarified
1 point

Oh, yes! Is this debate related to the other debate, which is about, is better to be loved or to love.

2 points

No, waiting for a ship at the airport, is an error of the person, not the 'loved perosn'.

izazovnog(322) Clarified
1 point

Of course.

1 point

Thor is more creative, and intresting.

However if it is Thor fighting Superman, Thor would win. One of supermans weaknesses is magic!


1 of 13 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]