This is the video debate for Group 9A - the dam at Hetch Hetchy should be removed.

This is the debate video for Group 9B - the argument that the damn should NOT be removed.

Here is the video for group 8b - water quality over water quantity.

Here is the video from group 8A-- water quantity over water quality.

REVISED LINK FOR 7B VIDEO

https://ucdavis365-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/yqzhu ucdavisedu/ERi8PKjXM9tMtCroFzd2XWsBdrbNtdTv2n92VBqO2jVUgg

This is pro side -> groundwater and surface water should be managed conjunctively. Enjoy!

This it the con stance (they should be managed separately). Go this link and login with your ucdavis credentials to view the ppt. Once you click on "present" and move to the second slide, audio will began automatically.

https://ucdavis365-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/yqzhu ucdavisedu/ERi8PKjXM9tMtCroFzd2XWsBdrbNtdTv2n92VBqO2jVUgg

Hi All: I'm including the link to the Group 6A debate video. Note that because of the permissions that are currently set, you can only view the presentation in google slides. The view only permission will not allow for listening to the audio(!?)-- so note that I messaged the group to see if they can change the permissions!

In the meantime, you can check out the slides and also see text on the bullet points in the notes sections of most slides!

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/11dMqWtTWrks8-KOcCsfMUTxGCS7SliYAA-TgzLI1IMM/edit?usp=sharing

This is the video for Group 6B: the idea that humans should receive more emphasis in California water planning than the environment.

I've embedded a YouTube link, but you can also access/download the video here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JRYuRfGiNQlFT23xa6aii4c7CNUTphKt/view?usp=sharing.

This is the video for the Debate Group 5A: Pro NoCal moving water to SoCal!

Please visit the link (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AQSooa-J8T2q2HB3SD-nNGoemw0eA3zU/view?usp=sharing) and download the powerpoint for Debate Group 5B. Once you download the ppt and view it in presentation mode, the audio and timing should work automatically.

This is the video for the "Pro" side -- nonpoint source pollution SHOULD be regulated. To respond click on dispute, clarify, etc. below the video!

This is the video for the "Con" side -- NPS should NOT be regulated. Please respond to this post by clicking below the video.

For the pro-domestic side of the debate, please visit this link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByWLnqCucx73MlNnUzNEcDNLZDZ0X2YwTV9aSGJZcWt4TmZR/view?usp=sharing and download the powerpoint. On each slide you can click the audio symbol and hear the recording.

This is the video from group 3A -- pro irrigation. Please watch both videos before you post.

This is the debate video supporting the idea that humans do not have a right to water

Group 2A video defending the stance that yes, humans have a right to water.

This is my comment on the Debate. I agree with the "Against Side" because the evidence provided is much more convincing.

This is my comment on the video that I support. I agree with the Against side because of blah blah blah blah.

This is the video to go with the Against Side of this debate.

asoidfjoasdjfpoasijdfpoajsdpfjaspdjfpasdjfpaosjdfpoajsdpfjaspdojf

This is a post for HYD/SAS10 class- I am testing out the CreateDebate System