What is your problem ?

Good heavens! It doesn't hurt to lighten up a bit !

Because it is so cold here, and we get all the radioactive pollution from you Yanks, sometimes strange things can happen.

Quocalimar- He is very intelligent and is capable of making logical and reasonable arguments on most subjects.

Do not act like you have a degree in history. It is apparent that you have obtained all your information from second-rate historical documentaries and your own personal hunches. You haven't the slightest clue about Armaments Minster Albert Speer and his relocation of German war industry, this is what made the Allied bombing highly un-effective against armaments facilities. You may now argue the issue of morale and German workers casualties; however, the Nazi propaganda machine led by Josef Goebbles saw to it that the majority of the civilian population was sufficiently indoctrinated to resist the propaganda value of Allied bombings in their entirety.

http://ww2db.com/battlespec.php?battleid=55

Now you are also making an attempt at arguing that the Allied supreme leaders, including FDR and Churchill, knew nothing whatsoever about the strength of Nazi Germany in Relation to Imperial Japan. This is simply preposterous. May I remind you that Germany was very close to complete domination of Europe. This was the primary threat. Additionally, the German Whermarcht employed revolutionary tactics and strategy. This, along with very advanced weaponry made them a seemingly unstoppable force. The German military High Command was also very keen on developing ''wunderwaffe'' or wonder-weapons. Some of the more known ones are: The King Tiger, The ME-262, The V-1, V-2 and V-3 series of revenge weapons, Seran Gas, and the most dangerous of these weapons, a nuclear type device. There are some eye-witness accounts of an actual test of one of these nuclear devices near the Baltic coast. This is corroborated with tests from the alleged sight. This of course cannot be definitively proven, but it is a possibility. The leaders of the Western Allies knew the threat of German Super-weapons was great, this was spurred on by a letter from Albert Einstein to FDR warning about the Nazi nuclear programme.

As for the Japanese, the facts you state are also preposterous. Yes, the A6M was a very good fighter, but by late 1942, the Allies deployed fighters capable of besting the Zero in a dogfight. Namely, these were the F6F Hellcat and the F4U Corsair. The Japanese navy was relatively large, but the Royal Navy was significantly larger, and the American and Canadian navy's were in a massive expansion programme. Japan could simply not compete with this.

Japanese strategies and tactics were also out-dated, Banzai charges against .30 caliber machine guns are a big no-no in military thought. The Japanese tanks such as the Ha-Go, were inferior even to the Sherman, and production could not hold a candle to that of the US, or USSR. May I also remind you that the USSR and Germans were fighting almost exclusively on one front from 1941-1943. The battle of Kursk took place in the Summer of 1943 and was a decisive Soviet Victory. Your claims are completely false.

Remember, the USSR and Japan fought it out in 1939. The Soviets were victorious.

the-forgotten-soviet-japanese-war-of-1939

And would you like to back up your claims? It will be impossible because they are largely false.

Supporting Evidence: The USSR could have won. (rt.com)

150 days ago | Side: U.S.S.R

I don't think this one was too bad. I did a pretty good job.

I can see it now. Rabbi and Imam- Zombie Hunters!

Praying five times a day to defeat the zombies.

Interesting.

Well, Russia was the main SSR, they were actually refereed to as the RSFSR. However, still if you call the USSR just Russia, then It leaves out all other SSR's and they are what made the nation of the Soviet Union, instead of just Soviet Russia.

They basically did. Every SSR was under the unified direction of the capital city Moscow. The USSR was one country and they were reacting to what they say as the US threat.

Yes, the USSR was one country made up of many different regions called Soviet Socialist Republics. An SSR was much like an American state.

I would have to disagree. What if Soviets refereed to the USA as just California, or New York? Wall street was essentially one of the main belligerents on behalf of the US in the Cold War. Furthermore, in the USSR, remember the massive Kazakh SSR. They contributed much to the Union.

The USSR refers to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Russia was but one republic, and calling the USSR Russia leaves out other republics such as Georgia, Armenia, Latvia, et cetera

Adolf Hitler wanted to invade and conquer the Soviet Union. That is very ambitious. Then he wanted the world. In addition to that. He planned to use starvation to "eliminate" 30 million Eastern European peoples'. In addition to that, Hitler is more or less responsible for the horrendous deaths of more than 60 000 000 people.

In societies where education is free and accessible to everyone, it can be seen that these societies benefit greatly. The Nordic countries come to mind in particular.

Overall, I do not think that graduation with 100 000 dollars worth of debt is beneficial to society.

Joe wins, all the way. But I think one of Prodigee's accounts got the most points in one week. Something like over 1100.

That takes some dedication, even if it was spamming.

If the video is legitimate, they should buy it. It is important to keep the leaders accountable. Also, this guy is really annoying. He is in scandal after scandal, and something has to give. I hear that they almost have enough.

I probably will .

I think it would be good if there was a category for most ideologically steadfast.

#Canadian Problems ;)

Both Diet coke and Coca-Colz Zero are terrible for health reasons. In Venezuela, Coke Zero is banned, for good reason.

That really is true. Maybe I just got in a rut with a few people that just happen to be Americans.

Hahaha, maybe because you made a Canadian debate I'll stay a bit more ;)

Good bye all! :3

Seriously man, I hope you don't believe what they tell you on that channel. It's just whoa. This one anchor woman was talking about how background checks led to registration than extermination; I was shocked. The thing with FOX is, they put on whatever Rupert Murdoch wants.

I really hate MSNBC as well.

I don't watch any US American TV at all.

And on your first point, all I can really do is laugh hysterically.