If they don't have to still be alive, then Martin Luther King Jr.

I guess I should have clarified a bit more. I forgot to put "religious child indoctrination." My fault.

What will happen when God speaks what word? This is a very vague argument. Please elaborate.

By far, the Bat-Mobile. Not to mention the rocket boosters.

I personally hate it. It doesn't bother me as much when I just see a company logo in the background or something, but when the actors actually take away time from the plot/ incorporate it in the plot for some advertisement for a brand name product, it gets me.

"Your face"? No, no, no. That's illogical. It should be "Your mom!"

I once prayed for a puppy, but my pastor told me prayer doesn't work like that, so I just stole one and prayed for forgiveness instead.

Maybe. It would save energy too.

From my knowledge on the subject, more emissions are put into the atmosphere from clearing the land, harvesting, and refining a crop to be used as a biofuel, than the biofuel it self being used as a substitute for a fossil fuel prevents.

Batteries are separate.

"By taking out the cost of the battery ($34,000) the "City" car will only cost from $15,000 - $17,000 in the United States. A "mobility fee" of $100 to $200 a month that might also include services like insurance and wireless Internet access seems to be part of the business plan. Managing a two way exchange of electricity with the electric grid is another possibility. Thousands of cars plugged into the electric grid could be tapped during energy demand spikes. PG&E;plans to buy batteries that have outlived their usefulness for transportation but still retain capacity. The utility will install them in the basements of office towers and at electrical substations to store green energy produced by wind farms and solar arrays."

So, I guess that they cost a shit load to operate properly...

Source of Article ↓

If you want good mileage, just wait a few years for the release of the Th!nk car; a fully electric car for 2009 in the States. I would wait for the price to lower, but it looks awesome. It was originally Ford's concept, but some other company bought it.

But we're no strangers to love! I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling!

Is it worth it? Fuck yeah it is. Modern medicine has expanded the lifespan of the average human being from around 25 years old (Neanderthal), to about 67 years old (Current). The Haber process feeds over 2.3 billion people in the world, and water purification methods prevent a many sicknesses and illnesses from foreign that can be found in water. Modern medicine is what allowed us to cure and prevent smallpox, which in its existence, killed over half a billion people. So, we aren't becoming weaker, we are becoming stronger due to medicinal technologies. As our knowledge expands, so does the likelihood of us curing and preventing more serious diseases and epidemics. Yes, it is worth it.

That's basically the superpower to end all superpowers. No limits to what you can do.

This is just me, but I think immortality would suck. Having a finite existence gives your life purpose, meaning, and a great reason to savor it while you can.

Probably the ability to fly. Yes, I know it's not very creative, but imagine the possibilities. You could travel anywhere in the world in a matter of minutes, and just looking down at th Earth from miles in the sky would be awesome. If not the ability to fly, than the ability to travel back and fourth through time. Imagine how much could be learned from that. Basically all of histories questions could be answered.

K-Pax. It isn't one of my favorite movies, but I've never watched a movie where I though so much just for it to make sense. It's quite puzzling, and I still think about it sometimes.

It costs up to 50% more to give someone the death penalty than letting them live out their life in jail. Also, I find it to be nothing more than a revenge tactic, and a way to leave more space in prisons. It doesn't matter if the culprit is dead or still alive, what they did is irreversible.

I don't think so. I think weed is really only considered a gateway drug because it is the least "powerful" of the common illegal drugs, so if you were to remove weed from the equation, the next lowest drug would be considered the gateway drug.

So, I don't think weed is what causes people to move on to more stronger drugs, but the person's use of the drug is. Obviously, a person that smokes weed occasionally and makes it just a once in a while ordeal will get a lot more from it than a person that smokes it as much as they can. The chain smoker's body will grow a tolerance to the THC in weed, so they need either more weed or a stronger drug to achieve the same high.

With the Colbert Report, I am informed and entertained, while O'Reilly's show tends to be manipulative and biased, and whenever someone opposes Bill, the guest and Bill just start screaming at each other.

Intelligence compliments a womans looks/likability, but is in no way a valid substitute for them.

The Milky Way Galaxy alone has a projected 100 billion stars, and with each of those stars having the possibility of having celestial objects with suitable conditions for harboring life, I'd say it's a good chance.