CreateDebate


LibertyFTW's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of LibertyFTW's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

When there were more liberals. .

2 points

Conservatives .

1 point

A restoration of constitutional principles are much more important than restoration of democracy, seeing as how the two can easily conflict. I mean, we don't want mob rule now do we?

We might not live in a genuine direct democracy but that does not mean we don't live in a representative democracy. The most important thing any politician can do is the represent the American people by listening to them also we don't want to end up in the great depression again and ignore what the issues are for the American people simply because "that's not important" or "we don't have the authority to do anything under the constitution" here is a fun little fact about the constitution most of the founding fathers disliked the result of the constitution, and others hated it most significantly Thomas Jefferson he believed that instead of the amendments we rewrite the constitution every two decades! Now if we listen to an economic system mandated by the constitution (Laissez-faire Capitalism) the middle class would not exist it took government involvement throughout the 20th century to essentially create the middle class!

2 points

The possibility of the existence of God is minimal the strongest evidence against God is this simple concept Christians happen to believe about it, omnipotence.

1 point

The best way we can stop this problem IMO is by replacing private funding of electoral campaigns with public funding and by abolishing crappy voting technology that stole the 2000 and 2004 elections from the Democrats, what would result is a restoration of our democracy.

2 points

Republicans obviously fucking did it themselves this is all thanks to Ted Cruise and his obsession with de funding the patient protection act!

1 point

Yes if it the only path to positive salvation I'll take it, problem is THERE IS NO GOD!!

1 point

Luckily we do have one, it's called the national day of reason.

2 points

The definition of privacy is the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people. Hypothetically if a man is writing a significantly important article and his wife walks into the room without him being aware he would be distracted and hence he would want privacy not necessarily because he is hiding his work he has no problem with anyone seeing it it is just that he wants to get it done!

1 point

In that case it would repopulate earth so yeah, and besides there are only a few men in this hypothetical so it would not genuinely be that harmful especially if a lot of the women had multiple children repopulating the earth at a quicker rate and at some point when earth has repopulated enough I would outlaw rape once again!

3 points

The New Deal paved the way for our monster government that we have today

So you think the US would have been better off with the great depression for the rest of the 20th century, I hate to tell you this but Ayn Rand laissez faire capitalism is completely outdated if we had no regulations on businesses,if we had no Federal Reserve, if we had no National Industrial Recovery Act there would be no middle class, the middle class would simply be non existent! Don't believe me? The top 1% has 40% of the nations wealth, now just imagine laissez faire capitalism applied to that. case closed

2 points

The Japanese were not going to give up, at all it was one of their policies us traumatizing them with the atom bomb was the only genuine way to send the message telling them we want them to surrender.

2 points

Without the Manhattan Project we could still be fighting the second world war!

1 point

Yes considering that they largely contributed to the establishment of America, however their views on government are outdated and it has been proven to be such in 1929 with the great depression, a result of laissez faire capitalism. Additionally I must add that the constitution was in fact a compromise the founders did not agree on the establishment of the country and the constitution was a compromise. Thomas Jefferson believed that the constitution was something to be re-written every 19 years one of the first mistakes in this nations history was in 1795 when the constitution was apparently not re-written.

UNCONSTITUTIONAL ME
2 points

Roosevelt's new deal reshaped American economics for about a century, he regulated businesses, passed the National Industrial Recovery Act and guided America out of the great depression. Reagan had sold weapons to Iran and increased out debt.

0 points

The further the left you go, the more socialistic

And the more right you go the more you lean into hierarchy where the top 1% gets 75% of the country's wealth while the 99% sufferers!

The idea redistributing the wealth is just wrong it hurts the people who work for their money

Much of our policies already harm the people who work for money, the income tax in general takes away money people worked for and yet without it the government would not be able to function properly, income taxes give money to the government who uses wisely.

and enables those who do nothing to benefit from the hard work of others.

So your solution is to just ignore the poor and middle class while having the system benefit rich people and corrupt big business, Gotcha.

United States welfare, which provides not incentives for actually finding a paying job rather than living off government money

Look at Norway, they are a welfare state and they are one of the riches countries on earth! I rest my case

The notion of government funded healthcare is a bad idea.

So what exactly is your solution of the more the 3 million Americans without health insurance, last time I checked the traditional conservative solution is to die quickly! having more unfortunate people without healthcare die, that sounds very "pro-life" to me. This is another example of why other countries happen to be beating us, every developed country has free health care with the US as an exception!

Liberal views on gun control are just wrong.

Conservative views on gun control (gun anarchy) are FAR worse!

Just because not everyone needs or wants to own a gun doesn't mean it should be hard to get one

Great an attack on background checks! Look we don't want to make it harder for everyone to get guns, we just want to make it harder for criminals and psychopaths to get guns. And you should not bitch about guns until assault rifles are outlawed which is as common sense as you can get on guns.

The death penalty is a perfectly justifiable act for a person who has committed such a serious crime as murder.

Capital punishment is one of the most embarrassing and outdated things we have retained in this country, again it shows the hypocrisy on Republicans of being pro-life only in the case of a fetus but when you are in a foreign country the US does not happen to like, lacking healthcare or are a "convicted" criminal all of a sudden the Republicans say fuck life, plus the damn thing is rather ineffective! 68% of people who have been convicted to capital punishment have later been proven to be innocent as libertarian God Ron Paul agrees. Don't bother using the deterrent excuse since the murder rate in death penalty states are higher than the murder rates in non death penalty states, so it must be a shitty deterrent!

Most liberals, including one of my best friends, seem to argue that it's more humane to keep a mass-murderer in prison for life, spending million of dollars in food, clothing, equipment, etc.

The fact keeping a mass-murderer on death row for years and than committing capital punishment is more expensive than life in prison suddenly makes life in prison a more welcoming choice doesn't it? I needn't argue with that.

1 point

The further the left you go, the more socialistic

And the more right you go the more you lean into hierarchy where the top 1% gets 75% of the country's wealth while the 99% sufferers!

The idea redistributing the wealth is just wrong it hurts the people who work for their money

Much of our policies already harm the people who work for money, the income tax in general takes away money people worked for and yet without it the government would not be able to function properly, income taxes give money to the government who uses wisely.

and enables those who do nothing to benefit from the hard work of others.

So your solution is to just ignore the poor and middle class while having the system benefit rich people and corrupt big business, Gotcha.

United States welfare, which provides not incentives for actually finding a paying job rather than living off government money

Look at Norway, they are a welfare state and they are one of the riches countries on earth! I rest my case

The notion of government funded healthcare is a bad idea.

So what exactly is your solution of the more the 3 million Americans without health insurance, last time I checked the traditional conservative solution is to die quickly! This is another example of why other countries happen to be beating us, every developed country has free health care with the US as an exception!

Liberal views on gun control are just wrong.

Conservative views on gun control (gun anarchy) are FAR worse!

Just because not everyone needs or wants to own a gun doesn't mean it should be hard to get one

Great an attack on background checks! Look we don't want to make it harder for everyone to get guns, we just want to make it harder for criminals and psychopaths to get guns. And you should not bitch about guns until assault rifles are outlawed which is as common sense as you can get on guns.

The death penalty is a perfectly justifiable act for a person who has committed such a serious crime as murder.

Capital punishment is one of the most embarrassing and outdated things we have retained in this country, plus the damn thing is rather ineffective! 68% of people who have been convicted to capital punishment have later been proven to be innocent as libertarian God Ron Paul agrees. Don't bother using the deterrent excuse since the murder rate in death penalty states are higher than the murder rates in non death penalty states, so it must be a shitty deterrent!

Most liberals, including one of my best friends, seem to argue that it's more humane to keep a mass-murderer in prison for life, spending million of dollars in food, clothing, equipment, etc.

The fact keeping a mass-murderer on death row for years and than committing capital punishment is more expensive than life in prison suddenly makes life in prison a more welcoming choice doesn't it? I needn't argue with that.

1 point

She's allowed to get involved, in fact it was me who interrupted your debate it happens all the time on this site.

2 points

I think that question was directed the other way around, would you be happy without a purpose?

1 point

I like to live for today .

1 point

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being, abortion for the most part legal hence it is not murder.

1 point

Again, it doesn't fucking matter, They were progressive get over it!

libertyFTW(213) Clarified
1 point

This is how

from Job 3:16-19

"Or why was I not as a hidden untimely birth, as infants that never see the light? There the wicked cease from troubling, and there the weary are at rest. There the prisoners are at ease together; they hear not the voice of the taskmaster. The small and the great are there, and the slave is free from his master."

libertyFTW(213) Clarified
2 points

This is how

from Job 3:16-19

"Or why was I not as a hidden untimely birth, as infants that never see the light? There the wicked cease from troubling, and there the weary are at rest. There the prisoners are at ease together; they hear not the voice of the taskmaster. The small and the great are there, and the slave is free from his master."


2 of 19 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]