CreateDebate


Link6065's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Link6065's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Did you know that your white blood cells produce hydrogen peroxide to kill bacteria in the blood stream? If not, further research on your part may help your inconceivable nature.

1 point

Sure free speech for all. That doesn't constitute orthodox belief in the subject among all the subjects that lie therein subject to that belief system.

1 point

Life starts at conception and birth is the start of a specific species life. The being inside the body is unfortunately defined as a parasite (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/parasite). After birth, it is defined as a creature of its own species (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ species). Therefore, the life of a human does not commence until after birth however; the parasitic nature of an unborn child does not exclude it from being classified as alive.

link6065(740) Clarified
1 point

Specifics are the deducing factor of life, friend. Glad you were able to hold some ground here.

1 point

I disagree... In mathematics, negatives are a widely used function in plot graphing. If you have a basement for example. It is a negative component of your house

1 point

What i'm saying is just because you say "we" doesn't mean that the whole world agrees that there is no such thing as an atom. Especially when there is enough information and research conducted in easy to reach places for anyone to look at; which of course says the opposite of what you do.

1 point

I reject your statement with this note.

Apes are their own species inside the hominidae family. We did not evolve from apes we evolved from a different species that grandfathered the current primate species that we have today. Humans did not evolve from apes. Apes being the key word there. we descended from an ancient being that would classify as a member of the hominidae family. However, apes are a separate evolutionary track then human. The differences between human and ape are huge as well as their similarities.

1 point

Maybe you dont... doesn't mean the rest of us are as ignorant.

1 point

No... not logically.

Unless you are ready to say the atom has a consciousness all its own. which would make it even more a god or the god..

because as far as I can tell the atom is life less. However it can make life happen when special conditions are met. It takes the inanimate to make the animate.

1 point

Humans are a different species from apes. We are classified as coming from a relative family. We may have had a common ancestor but under your reasoning we are the same species as a bacteria. Science has deduced the earliest life to single celled organisms that do indeed follow the pattern you describe but let me tell you. We did not evolve from apes. You just spewed to me a lot of mumbo jumbo that makes no sense to the debated question. DID HUMANS EVOLVE FROM APES?

now... did we evolve from an earlier ancestor that was a different species then?... and is what we see a strong relationship tree between us, apes and other mammalian apelikes? (baboon for example)

if yes, then we did not evolve from apes.

1 point

The atom created itself. .

1 point

he died for all... only those who accept him as lord and master are granted the gift of eternal life though

1 point

I thought Jesus died for our sins so we could be forgiven and spend eternity with him and the Father in heaven?

Everyone's soul has been given over to Satan. We are Satan's until God gives a new nature and faith in Himself.

lmfao you haven't changed a bit LOLZORS. You're still a complete twat with an overinflated ego with an unrealistic vision of self importance.

and as for a real argument. I say look at the atom. The fundamental creator of all matter. To me that is Godly. It creates everything and God is the creator. To me there's a link in the chain.

1 point

"Exodus 20:1-15 ESV / 313 helpful votes

And God spoke all these words, saying, “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery. “You shall have no other gods before me. “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, ... " <--- bible passage about gods view on false idols.

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&tbm;=isch&source;=og&sa;=N&tab;=li&q;=jesus&biw;=1366&bih;=550&sei;=i0P3UdjeM7er4API7oHgCw#facrc=&imgdii;=&imgrc;=vvjSbDTfrH_1NM:;39HL5h90BaQP5M;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imperialteutonicorder.com%2Fsitebuildercontent%2Fsitebuilderpictures%2Fheart-jesus.jpg;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imperialteutonicorder.com%2Fid97. html;301;400

^proof jesus is a false idol.

Conclusion.

So I'm assuming you're Jewish?... Christians aren't very well on gods good side seeing as Christ is a false idol.

P.S Noone's perfect. ;) especially you.

1 point

why don't you figure it out for yourself Mr.Holierthenthou.

1 point

Exodus 20:1-15 ESV / 313 helpful votes

And God spoke all these words, saying, “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery. “You shall have no other gods before me. “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, ...

So I'm assuming you're Jewish... Christians aren't very well on gods goodside seeing as Christ is a false idol.

1 point

Community service does not lead to tyranny.

Community service is volunteer.

Thats what slavery is along with indentured servitude

You're sticking two things together that are the same thing.

which is in a sense what we have today with contract workers.

Using the power of suggestion to make something that isn't into something that is.

Slavery is not inherently evil.

You're wrong.

You really need to look at context................................

I am looking at the context. You may need to go back to school and get some English lessons. Your context is as clear as day. Volunteer work does not lead to tyranny. Two things that are obviously slavery are the same thing in a sense (even though not even close) to something that is not.

and slavery isn't entirely evil... You sound like blubbering idiot to me.

I feel sorry for the professor who has to grade your essays.... That is assuming that you got into a university.

I choose not to go to university.

Oh.... did I hit something sensitive?

No, not really...

Did you go to college?

Yup.

Hmm... well, then I understand where you are coming from.

What are you bragging that you spent tens of thousands of dollars on a really shitty education... claps bravo.

I remember the days when I was like you: ignorant and too arrogant to actually pay attention.

You must have a really short memory. You are ignorant and arrogant and half the time don`t pay attention. (Proof: the first comment you made in this debate)

If you had paid attention, then you would have noticed multiple things: (1) "in a sense"

That`s such a vague statement that it means nothing because in a sense can be swung the other way and be the exact opposite of what you want me to believe. and the statement literally really only means depending how you look at it. I know enough about slavery to know its inherently evil. I can swivel that one out for myself without spending 20 grand in tuition and books. o.O can you say the same...

nd (2) "indentured servitude... is"

which is in a sense what we have today with contract workers.

The whole sentence says more and the sentence just shows how manipulated you are into believing even for a second that slavery could be a good thing.

which both say that we are not talking about today's notion of slavery but the past slavery.

Ohh you cocky son of a bitch. You are mixing the past with the present don`t kid yourself. Nice try. They both say very little about anything. You're talking about today's contract work being "depending on how you look at it" the same as it was back in the say. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING. There are fundamental differences that you are being ignorant and arrogant in your assertions there, of.

If you hadn't been too prideful to actually read the context, then you wouldn't be arguing.

wrong.

The only issue was accidentally not including "prisoner" before community service.

Your points fall to shame at truth and logic.

You wasted your money on your university undergrad?

1 point

``Lolzors93(2115)

1 point

Community service does not lead to tyranny. Thats what slavery is along with indentured servitude, which is in a sense what we have today with contract workers. Slavery is not inherently evil.``

On the contrary Lolzors, I addressed to atypican in the last statement of my first argument. The rest was for you. The discussion between me and you and the argument i had disputed does in fact relate to a time period. One you specified. So suck my big fat willie.

Also, responding at all is another indication of how much shit you are full of. Good night. I rest my case.

1 point

That`s also because we are talking about indentured servitude of today. Not back then ?_? you lose again shit for brains.

1 point

only hotter then the sun.... I`d like to toast some wienies and marshmallows on er body if she happens to be the anti-christ. ?_?

1 point

You misunderstand what is meant by community service. Community service is done by prisoners after committing a crime.

Actually, you`d have had to specify that before that would even be acknowledged. Otherwise it`s just community service. In cases of prisoners you are not a slave, you are just subject to authorities. They don`t technically own you as property. There are similarities and the word servitude applies to both slaves and those completely subject to higher powers. But, in this case you are being treated like a slave without being one officially.

And indentured servitude is the exact same thing....

Indentured servitude, servitude and slavery are all different things that share strong similarities but, distinctive differences. Servitude itself being the only exception with an exception.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha This is my last post since you don't understand history.

I`m not complaining.

by the way that`s logical fallacy number 3... The presence of two or more possible meanings in a single passage. Also, a fallacy in which the same term is used in more than one way.

am·bi·gu·i·ty

[am-bi-gyoo-i-tee] Show IPA

noun, plural am·bi·gu·i·ties.

1.

doubtfulness or uncertainty of meaning or intention: to speak with ambiguity; an ambiguity of manner.

2.

an unclear, indefinite, or equivocal word, expression, meaning, etc.: a contract free of ambiguities; the ambiguities of modern poetry.

link6065(740) Clarified
1 point

They would be tyrants who have the disobedient killed. (china)

1 point

(double post due to error: deleted by user) .

1 point

Clarified (not disputed)

Well, they used to be beat mercilessly. Today the methods are much more subtle. For example Adam Kokesh recently went to jail for marching in Washington DC with a shotgun on independence day. Of course there is no way of telling at this point if police planted any evidence in Kokeshes house however, they did raid it unconstitutionally.


1 of 40 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]