CreateDebate


Mikee32's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Mikee32's arguments, looking across every debate.
0 points

You are completely right of course, and as soon as I posted it I realized someone would say something to that effect. I think that cut-off would be at the point the embryo begins to develop specific features: eyes, mouth, specific arms and legs, etc. Just realized I accidentally posted the same thing twice... my bad.

2 points

You are completely right of course, and as soon as I posted it I realized someone would say something to that effect. I think that cut-off would be at the point the embryo begins to develop specific features: eyes, mouth, specific arms and legs, etc.

1 point

No, they should not. Their religion is their own personal belief, which will most likely not influence you or anyone else in a negative way. If their religion does influence you in negative way though, (9/11 is an example of this) you should not judge the entire group following the religion, just the ones that committed the crime.

1 point

Yes it should be legal, within the first time frame of the pregnancy, the embryonic stage. Once the embryo first develops into a "baby", when it is no longer embryonic, abortion is not right. Under certain circumstances though, this condition might be avoided, like if the woman is underage, or was raped.

2 points

Religion is a person's personal choice. If you want to be a Christian, you are because thats what you believe. If you are a Jew, you are because thats what you believe. It's the same for any other religion.

Does anyone else have any right to make laws based on the belief of a specific group, leaving out the rest? Or do they even have the right (or the ability) to control what you believe? No.

1 point

What is so bad about homosexuality? If two consenting people decide to do something in private, is that any of our business?



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]