The different media outlets are protecting Biden either by not publishing his gobbledegook or editing his incoherent ramblings to make this dangerous idiot appear to be at least partially normal;- no one could make him seem totally mentally normal.
At least he hasn't tried to overturn an election or start a riot OR insult his opponents OR hide his tax returns.
If you can't understand Antrim's 'hoyty toyty' language, I understand. Here is what they're saying in much clearer words:
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH I HATE BLACK PEOPLE BUT YOU'RE WORSE THAN ME BECAUSE YOU POINTED OUT THAT I'M RACIST BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
What's a real laugh is that you think I care about YOUR yarn. Enjoy wasting your breath.
Also:🇬🇧🇬🇧=✓, 🇺🇸🇺🇸=💩💩
Translation: If encouraging toxic stereotypes is the level which we've descended to, then consider the stereotype that we're just plain better than American arseholes like you.
I thought you might need pictures to have it explained.
You have not expressed your own slant on the thread but as usual are only interested in slagging off the factual statements of your superiors.
Oh? Huh. You seem to think you know everything. I never see you in other arguments that require any moral or practical thought; therefore I don't think you are one of my superiors.
It's not as if you bring any well formulated arguments to the table, much less diversity thereof.
You should be ashamed of that flag of yours that represents the subjugation of the developing countries of the world.
And you should be ashamed that you've learned nothing about America whilst living there. What do you care about subjugation of developing countries? They're all inferior because they're not white, according to you, so no harm is done.
You and your KIND set the scene for eternal international strife with your demonic Empire.
And yet here you are, Antrim. Since when have you given a 💩 about international strife? Why don't you try to answer my question instead of saying horrible things and pretending it's everyone else's fault?
You've probably never lived in America, dear Antrim, as you have no idea what the Hell you're talking about. You just use these threads to showcase your old colonialist views without any pushback.
Blacks have a disproportionate predisposition to violent crime and a congenital aversion to the disciplines required to participate successfully in formal education.
Have you studied their minds, Señor Conquistador?
I will concur because whilst I don't think it's possible for an large institution such as the US government to be racist against white people (since it is created and run by white people), but I do think that interpersonal racism, which is just personal prejudice, is certainly valid. But yes reverse racism, in the way it has perpetually affected racial minorities in America, cannot be directed back on white people.
Like I've said before, judging an ethnic group based on their achievements in a racist society is like wasting ammo on a rabbit carcass because you're not sure if it's dead. Obviously black people were oppressed so they weren't as productive as white people, but they have made a significant positive impact in society by opening businesses and other means.
I think it's our responsibility to have compassion for other groups of people because it is simply more productive than listing random things that happened to be invented by white people.
Republicans are out of control. America, what is up with you???
Republicans are brilliant idiots because somehow, in all their abject stupidity, they are able to maintain a grasp on your government. Giuliani gave a press conference in front of a sex shop and you idiot Yanks sit there and listen as if he ought to win a Pulitzer (or whatever prize lying, sweating, corpulent, fake-haired fake tanned toads deserve).
Need I speak further?
Also, we would welcome you back (😜) with open arms but I think the Queen saw your president's corruption, lies and eating habits and got cold feet about it.
Marriage began 4000 years ago so that parents and their offspring would have a stable, healthful home. Therefore, same-sex marriage is impossible.
That is the oddest argument against same sex marriage that I have seen in a very long time.
Perhaps try speaking English, not Back-Country Yank.
well according to the word of God it is considered a sin.
EDITED: Well--according to the word of God--it is considered a sin.
I beleive in the word of God. Second, it does not serve any purpose.
EDITED: You can omit the first sentence, as it is redundant. As well, omit "Second," because you never had a "First." Then you can combine the two sentences using a semicolon.
When a man and women has sex it has the potential to result in a baby.
EDITED: When a man and a woman have sex , it has the potential to result in a baby. This would be the same for the next sentence. The agreement is incorrect.
Well except aides.
EDITED: You should omit this. First of all, the tone is wrong. Second of all, it's a sentence fragment and cannot exist on its own. Third, it's AIDS; Fourth, the claim you made is misleading.
It is disgusting to be honest with you.
EDITED: This claim is irrelevant to your main argument. Your main claim is that according to the Word of God, homosexuality is a sin [disputed]. Therefore, you should provide evidence for why it is a sin [disputed] rather than showcase an opinionated sentence.
Also it is hard for men to establish relationships with other men who are gay.
EDITED: Also, it is hard for gay men to establish relationships with other gay men. [This claim is disputed].
Also, I would say I disagree with you but it's hard to figure out what you're trying to say.
FINALLY, you admitted children don't spread the disease very easily.
THAT WASN'T THE POINT OF MY POST! WE ALL KNEW THAT ALREADY.
The point, which you wholly MISSED was that IT DOESN'T MATTER. Why would you put children at risk? Is it any coincidence that Conservatives want to do that? No. They don't really care about people. YOU are the one spreading misinformation. Don't get all "high and mighty" and tell me that I'm the one "SPEWING DECEPTION."
It's not misinformation, it's logic. I thought you didn't want to hurt children; Only if it's convenient for the economy, I suppose.
Ok, fine, children don't spread the disease easily. However that is no reason to be breaking down the doors trying to make children go back to school. The risk is imminent even if children are low risk. You shouldn't want to put people at risk no matter who they are.
Privatised health insurance punishes those who have medical problems. It will punish those who contract the virus.
Stop saying "Well, it's not my fault," and start saying "We should all work together."
And yet Conservatives, when given the chance to give America universal healthcare that might help prevent those things, say that people are stupid and lazy and nobody deserves it except for you. That doesn't sound very Christian. It sounds Fascist.
It's also Fascist to spread misinformation about deadly viruses. Even if the children don't get it they can give it to everyone else around them including those at risk. Judging from the state your country is in there are too many people like you who are fine with loads of people dying in the name of the economy.
Don't try to twist my words. It won't work. I'm not denying that children may be at a lesser risk of Covid. But why put children and their families at risk by reopening schools? Have you seen the caseload? Do you know how many people have died?
There's absolutely no purpose to doing that. It's reckless and unnecessarily dangerous.
Gestapo Covid rules? Except I think you're missing the point of Covid rules which is to keep people from getting sick and dying. The Gestapo, from what I recall, tried to kill people so you better do something about your mucky logic.
Though it certainly seems as if the Gestapo has invaded your country seeing the shocking death toll.
Why are so many on the left, insecure?
Asks the bloke who posted 593488348 paragraphs of complete untruth to blame their insecurities on the left.
*Two grammar mistakes:Comma splice between Left and Insecure. Also, it's "others' " beliefs as it's a plural possessive.
I think the real question is whether the American right is truly not fascist.
1. FDR
2. Lyndon Johnson (i suppose without regards to his foreign policy)
3. Anyone but Ronald Reagan
4. Anyone but Ronald Reagan
5. Not Ronald Reagan or Trump or Bush or Andrew Jackson or Andrew JOhnson or JOhn Tyler or Calvin Coolidge or Herbert Hoover or Richard Nixon or lots of others whom I don't remember.
I am of the opinion that all racial/ethnic groups and nations have faced tremendous ''set-backs'' over the centuries most of whom have used these countless disasters to develop advanced counter measures that have successfully annulled their effects.
That is true, but some racial, ethnic, religious and other groups have faced, and tend to face a specific type of oppression or setback in the modern world. Do you believe that inventions are the only method of describing a race's successes?
Possession, use of, or dealing in illegal substances are all crimes and those who have been caught, tried and found guilty of these crimes are criminals.
These rules have been used in the past (in American history) to suppress votes from coloured people. The number of cases in which the duration of sentences has been more for people of colour than for whites would take years to count. The idea of white privilege, as I've said before, is a social construct, but it doesn't mean that it's not present. We don't have badges that denote this, but if we were caught with marijuana, as white people, the likelihood of us getting a long sentence would be much less than if we were coloured. Therefore, we have the privilege of perhaps feeling more immune to this certain law. It's not simply drug use. Look up the Central Park Five case. There's a documentary on Netflix about it.
The accepted meaning of White privilege is that their achievements and positions of seniority are due, not to their abilities, but as a consequence of their white skin.
The accepted meaning is:"Inherent advantages possessed by a white person on the basis of their race in a society characterized by racial inequality and injustice." (merriam webster)
For one instance, the first programmable computer was made at Bletchley Park, England during WW2 when there wasn't a black person to be seen.
Once again, with all due respect, I believe it's blind to judge a society, and the social interactions of a people based on who invented what.
Was this scientific breakthrough due to the colour of the inventor's skin?
Yes, but indirectly. Surely you'd agree that the people in that room could've all been Black (following your example), but there are many other factors at play such as:
-education for ethnic and racial minorities
-Poverty
-Lack of support in a white-centric system
The third on the list is the most important, because with a white-centric system comes the consequence of white privilege.
I don't think that's what White Privilege means. Though it's a bit confusing, at least I know that the world doesn't revolve around me.
Anyway, it's white privilege that keeps white people from getting strangled to death by a war crazed police officer, or sentenced to life in prison for simple possession of non harmful drugs. It has nothing to do with the achievements of white people over those of black people.
That was because of the setbacks they have faced throughout history, not laziness or incoherence.
While I respect many of your other opinions, Burrito, I must respectfully disagree. Historically, Anti-Jews have been much more destructive towards Judaism (ie the KKK) than atheists have been towards Christians.
And yes, with all due respect, I do think you're talking shit.
The topic under discussion concerns the barbaric act of the ANTIFA terrorists burning the Holy Book of a particular religion.
The Bible, Antrim. If you call that terrorism then you must have very low standards. Someone accidentally bumped you in the supermarket? TERRORISM. You were walking and tripped in a rut? TERRORISM. Black people existing? TERRORISM.
The real terrorism is your endless artillery of stupid, hilarious nonsense that you expect everyone else to read.
To contribute even more to their stupidity is the fact that they have no values whatsoever. They fight and disagree over everything and then shut down the government when they haven't got their way. Then they defend the US cases of Coronavirus as if it's another thing to be proud of.
Well, America, be proud. There is scarcely anyone who really cares to stop you.
Oh ,wait a minute, say all black looters are scum bags is not racist it’s a matter of fact
No. You are using "looting" to excuse your hatred of black people, because apparently you believe all looters are black. That's wrong.
There’s no ‘issues’ you think criminality is fine once you’re black you call it cultural diversity
There are issues. You are the issue, not cultural diversity. And no, I don't think criminality is fine but I'm not pretending that it's all black people. Also, where's your punctuation, you bleeding hypocrite?
You’ve been corrected on your punctuation 3 times now , I could do so on this post also but as we all know it’s your last resort at deflection for when you’re thrashed again in debate.
No, it's really not. It's that I skipped the last two of your arguments because punctuation was absent and therefore they made no sense.
It’s not ‘racist ‘ to call scum bags what they are colour does not come into it you stupid prick
Oh, wait a minute, saying that all black people are scum bags is not racist?
it’s blacks looting and glorifying and taking pride in their criminality and P C idiots like you who use terms like “cultural diversity “ to excuse the scum buckets....
I really don't think you understand the issues, rather you're throwing words about that make no sense. You say that being proud to be black is "criminal"? And white "Armed Protesters" aren't terrorists?
more robust policing is called for and more cracked skulls to let the message sink in
Of course. Let's do away with ethical questions and humanity in the law enforcement and just bash brains, trample and shoot people.
I'm going to take your arguments as seriously as you take your punctuation, being the expert to talk about how the "Bongos need the benefit of the doubt".
It would be a less strange world if filth such as you and your cuntrymen who enslaved most of the underdeveloped world had kept to their own shores and let other nations evolve at their own pace.
You're telling me nothing new, Antrim. It's rather funny how you blame me and my "countrymen" for things we did and yet you continue to pretend that other races are subordinate to white people, dubbing them Bongos. Do you know how that comes off? It makes life a lot easier on me because I consider what you said nothing more than an Ad Hominem attack.
The strife which you arrogant English scum bags caused in Ireland when you confiscated land and distributed it to English and Scottish farmers during the 16th and 17th centuries, ( known as the plantation) is still causing death and destruction to this day.
I'm well aware of my history, Antrim. You bring this up for what reason?
You slime balls can't take a shit unless the Yanks 'second the motion'.
No, you just think that because your president takes credit for things that aren't his.
Instead of displaying your flag you should be ashamed of it and everything which it represents including the ever growing global death toll of 100s of 1000s of people in lands where your unwanted meddling over the centuries continues to cause death and suffering on an industrial scale.
You're angry, I can see that. But what does this have to do with your incredibly racist language? Are you slandering me for trying to show you the truth? When you've got a moment that your head's not up your arse, formulate a argument and get back to me. Otherwise, I will ignore you.
Maybe Acceptable Humanity and Etiquette should be adjusted so that those of us who struggle with manners can simply remain out of view for the relief of the rest of the population.
A bongo is a drum, not whatever Antrim says it is.
Oh wait, I forgot. You Are Antrim, but you've been locked out because your certain challenge (spelled Racism not Ray-Cism) is just a tad too obvious. Better cover up your tracks by insulting me with useless tactics.
See you later, Antrim.
Well of course all whites should attempt to embrace English as used by our black brothers , after a hard days looting , cop killing , drug dealing and gang banging our hard working black gangsta rapping brothers demonstrate they like nothing better than to demonstrate their sublime use of the English language , a lovely example below .....
We should also strive to understand racist arseholes like you, but we've given up because their need to grasp at short straws to prove a point makes them so ridiculously stupid looking it's hard to even put our eyes upon it.
"Oh," said America, their people dying left and right, "Let's go watch three people fly into space." In doing so, none of the thousands of people watching those lucky ones escape the pandemic had enough sense to even pretend to wear a mask.
I'll probably catch a lot of flack for this...
Yeah, you're bloody right about that, you troll. How are those facts?
Are Christians harmful? Yes. Why? Because for thousands of years they've stifled dissent from every other important group of people.
Ok. I promise I'm not trying to attack you. I just have a question.
1. What is a specific Biblical citation for that? Could it be interpreted differently? And if God created only two, then what about hermaphrodites?
2. What grounds, other than religion, do you have against switching genders?
I'm just curious, I've got nothing against your opinion.
Oh, shut up, Outlaw. You're just upset that you work at McDonald's, and not Walmart, is that correct? Also, your mum supports you so I don't think you'd have to worry about not making money. If you did, then I'd bet your pet salamander that you'd drop everything and run to her side if you had to declare bankruptcy.
Aw, bless, the Confederate's gotten mad, has he?
Sorry if I didn't read that properly...you're NOT worried about British politics? Since when? Since after you stopped posting Breitbart articles about the shortage of Carbon Dioxide and somehow saying it's "The leftist's fault"?
faggoty "educators"
Excuse me? What was that? I laughed my head off, BigOats. You mean an educator in the form of a cigar??!! LOL. That is kind of bad.
Let me guess, you're 11 yo, bored out of your mind and instead of taking the Mickey when mum's not home you're up here all night spewing this barmy BS thinking we care? Go back to sleep, lad.
