CreateDebate


Rcmcgrew1's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Rcmcgrew1's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

What about uranium enrichment plants with centrifuges such as Fordow hidden from the Atomic energy agency. This is arguable because there are always ways around deals like this. If they continue to enrich their uranium will be more powerful.

1 point

This is arguable, yet your information should be further supported. The deal is not fine and there are many faults and there are always possibilities that the deal will not be renegotiated. The faults in the deal should be checked before anything is renegotiated. If you could give more support this could likely be more debatable as well.

rcmcgrew1(1) Clarified
0 points

Also, the deal will end in 10-15 years which allows these enrichment facilities to create nuclear weapons. This time has given them more opportunities to create stronger and more efficient weapons to their advantage.

0 points

The Iran deal is a precarious deal that could at any time fault. The deal does not secure the facility at Fordow, a facility which can easily manipulate and enrich the uranium with a centrifuge. For the deal to be efficient, Iran should have to get rid of its nuclear and missile programs all together.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]