CreateDebate


Sierrastruth's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Sierrastruth's arguments, looking across every debate.

Hahahaha.... Someone who thinks they can win an argument by insulting the other person, is nither smart nor right.

Rape, by definition is force. You cannot force a person to do something and still claim the forced had a choice. therefor, the forcer has no right to rape another even if its what they want to do with their body. want doesn't justify force.

when a person (or body) chooses to hurt (in a physical manner or theft of property) another body they should be punished for THAT crime. If a person decides to rape someone while they are intoxicated, you don't go searching for some inanimate object, past victimization or substance to blame ( i.e. past rape, alcohol etcetera.) You blame the person who made the CHOICE to rape. If alcohol was outlawed altogether do you honestly think there would be no car accidents, rapes, youths that drink or alcohol poisoning?

is a law going to stop a baby from getting alcohol poisoning?

I think your wrong. There may be SOME people who hate Obama because of the color of his skin, but in my experience the majority of people (especially of those who voted for him and that includes ethnic minorities) LOVE him for the color of his skin. That is and was all they see and that is just as bad (if not worse).

What a person decides to do with their own body should be no ones business but their own!

There should be no drinking age limit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are we talking about Obama or Romney, I'm confused? Did Romney pass like fifty executive orders, bye passing and undermining the American people? Did Romney kill thousands of people in the middle east, in a war that he is to much of a coward to declare a war? Is Romney trying to impose his uneducated, emotional, irrational, hypocritical moral superiority on EVERYONE, whether they agree with him or not? If you would like to debate our views on Obama lets do it. If you want to talk about a hypothetical Romney presidency we could do that too.

If hating Obama makes me an asshole, then so be it. Call me, or anyone else who doesn't agree with you, any name you want if it makes you feel better about the views you have. Obama, his like minded elected posse and all citizens who voted for him are selfish, greedy, power hungry tyrants. They deserve to be hated.

All "news" on TV is biased and absent most journalistic standards. I "trust" c-span, I enjoy Fox.

Its true, the majority of consumers aren't educated, but then neither are most voters not to mention people who don't vote at all, yet their ignorance and indifference effects everything and everyone else. However, once legislation effects THEIR lives they suddenly gain an interest and become educated which is what would happen in a free market. Plus, there are (and would be) people who would make it their mission to "expose" any perceived inequality or disregard for environment, thereby helping the public stay informed. When it comes to tech patents I'm afraid I'm not very educated (LOL) in my defense though, I don't really buy the stuff its to expensive for me. That being said I would think that in a free market there would be no patents, maybe royalty's, but patents seem to stifle creativity and competition. I am not informed on the "deregulation of the Russian economy" I will have to research that, though I sincerely doubt that deregulation is what actually happened let alone caused a collapse.

If government wasnt "keeping the economy in check" then corporations would answer to and be controlled by the educated consumer (the public). If government does bad things when its involved in the economy then we should stop it from being possible.

People should be allowed to carry gun anywhere, if they feel it is necessary for their safety.

I think it should be up to the insurance company. That being said I think it (and all other pharmaceutical drugs) should be sold over the counter.

A dictatorship is never needed...............................................................

sierrastruth(524) Clarified
1 point

If I killed hundreds of thousands of my own people and was given a trial, in which I was found guilty, I don't think I could or would expect anything else. Yes we should be able to watch it if we want. Political correctness hinders progress, instigates ignorance and leads to oppression of ideas. I haven't seen it and probably wont watch it, but I wouldn't deny another access just because I don't approve of it.

Death is reality. Hiding or denying reality is sickening.

Wow, your so smart. How craftily you avoid the question. I wish I knew how to win an argument by avoiding it and insulting the instigator. Bravo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pKasF6l3y0

It is one thing to assume that everyone is good and will not hurt you,and another to give up the means to protect yourself from the possibility that you are wrong.

Why is it wrong?..............................................................................................

I don't believe in point redistribution. Stand by your principals despite rejection and ridicule or conform to your objectors and be a sellout. don't ask me to sacrifice my morals just because I may like you. I will give you a point when I feel you deserve it. =)

Life begins at conception, I am also pro choice and I don't like abortion and wouldn't consider it except possibly if I was raped, but even then It wouldnt be an easy choice. I do think that the government should stay out of it altogether. However I understand the religious right few and thier concern and it is a legitimate one, the left doest seem to even consider the other sides view most of the time. Another good thing to consider is if a women is pregnant (and she wants and loves her unborn child) and she is attacked and the child is killed in the incident but the woman lives. I think the attacker should be charged with the child's death. If abortion is legal because the embryo is not "alive" and therefor can be "gotten rid of" then prosecuting the attacker for murder would not be possible. If it was decided that an embryo was alive starting from conception but gave women the option to kill it if they so decided, all party's could be mostly justified. The Christians could point at a woman getting an abortion and say you are a killer (and they would be right) a women could get an abortion for whatever reason she wanted without fear of being prosecuted and the person who kills a wanted baby would be punished for it.

I agree! I don't know why there arnt politicians out there willing to do this. there has to be some that want to do the job because they are passionate about the "greater good" and not about making a career for themselves. I would if I was elected, but its so damn expensive to get started. I am going to however, when my kids are a little older.


2 of 19 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]