CreateDebate


Spicyg's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Spicyg's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

putin rulllesssssssssssssssss..................................................

1 point

i say we should we have to pick communism is more a type of goverment and capitalism is an economic setup

you could in theory have both

1 point

you are a Hippocrit

.........................................

................stupi hoe

spicyg(24) Clarified
1 point

i meant kim jong un asshole

.......................................

1 point

yes they are forced to live in horiffic conditions something needs to be done

death to kim jong un

1 point

aye lad it should

...........................................................................

0 points

yes its their choice if they want to

they shouldnt be forced to believe in a false god

1 point

tell her if you truely love her than be honest with her and tell her how you feel

1 point

mr bean is one of the funiest carachaters in history ..................................

0 points

no because of the second amendment and if they do there will most likely be a second civil war

0 points

no this is america one of the things that makes us the great nation we are is the US Constitution and all of the rights it and its amendments grant its citizens and if guns were banned there would be another civil war

1 point

yes i think that they should be allowed to if it makes them feel safe

4 points

AMERCA.....................................................................................................................................................................................................

0 points

no as some one who has to deal with them on a dailly basis there are no were near mature enough to have the privilege and resposiblity to drive

1 point

as the guards enforced authoritarian measures and ultimately subjected some of the prisoners to psychological torture. Many of the prisoners passively accepted psychological abuse and, at the request of the guards, readily harassed other prisoners who attempted to prevent it. The experiment even affected Zimbardo himself, who, in his role as the superintendent, permitted the abuse to continue.

selected the 24 males whom they deemed to be the most psychologically stable and healthy.

.[3] The group was intentionally selected to exclude those with criminal background, psychological impairments or medical problems.

instructed them not to physically harm the prisoners.

. Guards from other shifts volunteered to work extra hours in order to assist in subduing the revolt, and subsequently attacked the prisoners with fire extinguishers without being supervised by the research staff. Finding that handling nine cell mates with only three guards per shift was challenging, one of the guards suggested that they use psychological tactics to control them

Guards forced the prisoners to repeat their assigned numbers[6] in order to reinforce the idea that this was their new identity. Guards soon used these prisoner counts to harass the prisoners, using physical punishment such as protracted exercise for errors in the prisoner count. Sanitary conditions declined rapidly, exacerbated by the guards' refusal to allow some prisoners to urinate or defecate anywhere but in a bucket placed in their cell. As punishment, the guards would not let the prisoners empty the sanitation bucket. Mattresses were a valued item in the prison, so the guards would punish prisoners by removing their mattresses, leaving them to sleep on concrete. Some prisoners were forced to be naked as a method of degradation. Several guards became increasingly cruel as the experiment continued; experimenters reported that approximately one-third of the guards exhibited genuine sadistic tendencies.

. When he refused to eat his sausages, saying he was on a hunger strike, guards confined him to "solitary confinement", a dark closet: "the guards then instructed the other prisoners to repeatedly punch on the door while shouting at 416."[7] The guards stated that he would be released from solitary confinement only if the prisoners gave up their blankets and slept on their bare mattresses, which all but one refused to do.

Zimbardo noted that, of more than fifty people who had observed the experiment, Maslach was the only one who questioned its morality.

1 point

as the guards enforced authoritarian measures and ultimately subjected some of the prisoners to psychological torture. Many of the prisoners passively accepted psychological abuse and, at the request of the guards, readily harassed other prisoners who attempted to prevent it. The experiment even affected Zimbardo himself, who, in his role as the superintendent, permitted the abuse to continue.

selected the 24 males whom they deemed to be the most psychologically stable and healthy.

.[3] The group was intentionally selected to exclude those with criminal background, psychological impairments or medical problems.

instructed them not to physically harm the prisoners.

. Guards from other shifts volunteered to work extra hours in order to assist in subduing the revolt, and subsequently attacked the prisoners with fire extinguishers without being supervised by the research staff. Finding that handling nine cell mates with only three guards per shift was challenging, one of the guards suggested that they use psychological tactics to control them

Guards forced the prisoners to repeat their assigned numbers[6] in order to reinforce the idea that this was their new identity. Guards soon used these prisoner counts to harass the prisoners, using physical punishment such as protracted exercise for errors in the prisoner count. Sanitary conditions declined rapidly, exacerbated by the guards' refusal to allow some prisoners to urinate or defecate anywhere but in a bucket placed in their cell. As punishment, the guards would not let the prisoners empty the sanitation bucket. Mattresses were a valued item in the prison, so the guards would punish prisoners by removing their mattresses, leaving them to sleep on concrete. Some prisoners were forced to be naked as a method of degradation. Several guards became increasingly cruel as the experiment continued; experimenters reported that approximately one-third of the guards exhibited genuine sadistic tendencies.

. When he refused to eat his sausages, saying he was on a hunger strike, guards confined him to "solitary confinement", a dark closet: "the guards then instructed the other prisoners to repeatedly punch on the door while shouting at 416."[7] The guards stated that he would be released from solitary confinement only if the prisoners gave up their blankets and slept on their bare mattresses, which all but one refused to do.

Zimbardo noted that, of more than fifty people who had observed the experiment, Maslach was the only one who questioned its morality.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]