CreateDebate


Yeajinkang's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Yeajinkang's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

The machine can conceal weapons like guns,knives, and explosives however the machine could not detect the drugs.

If drugs are hidden, how come the machines cannot find them? That indicates that the machines cannot find hidden materials in passengers luggage.

2 points

It is a discrimination. The TSA letting regular average americans pass by without a pat down but when a african american or an arabs passes by they make sure to pat him down and sometimes takes their fingerprints

3 points

The 4th amendment states that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized". The citizens of the U.S state that the pat downs that the TSA are doing is going against their rights of 4th amendment. Allowing the TSA to use the advanced imaging technology would be taking away the rights of the people.

Supporting Evidence: Bill of Rights - 4th Amendment (billofrightsinstitute.org)
2 points

People worry about getting cancer from unnecessary scanning machines.According to University of California at San Francisco doctors, the elderly, children, people with HIV or AIDs, and pregnant women could possibly be at a risk from this level of radiation. This is worried that this radiation could cause breast cancer for a fraction of the female population and is highly sensitive.

Supporting Evidence: Is the elevated safey worth the risks? (gleaner.rutgers.edu)


Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]