Peace.

Note that Love always overcomes hatred.- ;)

You'd said this:

"To say that 1+1 equals 11 is only wrong with regards to the fact that the person has not followed mathematical rules. But outside those rules, the answer 11 is still a valid response."

Well, how do you know? The Mathematical rules are according to Reality, it was made after calculating many things, before making final decisions for rules. If you are going to construct things without these Mathematical rules, then many many many more buildings would've collapsed...

And no, Real Reality are the Right things, as for Maths, people are the ones who are working the rules out, and not the other way round. Therefore, Math was just an idea for me to be a little sarcastic towards Ethics, as the rules of Ethics are Not according to reality, real reality is supposed to be just there, that's real reality, and Ethical rules are only made to try and change it negatively in my prospect, which means that it ain't according to the Right thing, the actual right thing, due to the fact that Humans are the ones who setted the rules to it (without calculating everything, that's why Ethical rules are all pretty much one sided), and not the other way round.

So here's my result after calculating (viewing) both (all) the pros. and cons., the Laws of the Universe is that:

Like rituals, whatever you send out always comes back.- XD

Wether G-d exists or not.- ;)

All the laws and ethical theories mankind has created was all for only one reason: For us to do the Right thing, imagine that you can weigh certain doings wether it's good or evil, so we can tell how much the certain doing or occurance is heading to the good side or the bad side, regarding the statue you see at most courts.

Telling the Truth like what most people who follow the Deontological Ethics is not neccessarily the Right thing to do, due to the fact that telling the Truth dosen't mean that you are definitley tilting the scale towards the good side, but it would always baise the scale, perhaps to the bad side, depending on the situation. Ignorance is not a bliss, but sadness.

Teleologist Ethics works in a way to be more complicative, with far more intelligence. It attempts to see how balance the scale is first, so you can have a better knowledge of the goodnesses and badnesses in order before making a final judgement to tilt the scale to the good side. And things should work more complicative, as our minds should be flexible and not like block heads if we are to respect the gift G-d has given us as intelligent species with Free Will choice. In addition, including the Ying and Yang theory, things are not only about viewing things as either a must be good or bad, but rather through the middle, as all bad things does have a bright side which you can follow towards. Concerning the fact that ignorance is not a bliss, but sadness, the aim for doing the Right thing is to bring happiness into reality, as that's what it's all about. Even in some cases were some may not get a chance to feel the warmth of it, it's still there, as G-d is omniscient. Furthermore, there is also a reason as to why my Teleologist Ethics's paragraph is much longer than the previous one, it's due to the fact that it is far more complicated with more intelligence, as Free Will choice had given me more important topics to type about.

Although some may say it also depends on how much sadness and happiness there is, within' a case, wether allot of people gain happiness, and just one person undergoes sadness or vise versa, if the Right thing is what most people would agree on to what should happen, which most people had already agreed on due to the fact that their are so many Ethical things such as the bible, then the happiness should be given to the righteous person or people. Therefore, doing the Right thing is our main duty, it helps everything to ride and not just overide everything else like what the Categorical Imperative says. As a result, my belief would be Teleologist Ethics. In addition, although what I said was mainly one sided, I was only talking on behalf of the right side, after filtering what I've known, so due to the fact that we have a Free Will choice to filter the things we know and come up with more ideas as answers lead to more questions, so that we can learn more, why not? If everybody had followed the Deontological Ethics like prisoners, then we would never had advanced our civilization.

Praveen Robin Biswakarma- ;)

Real heroism means being real, and acting real, NOT ACTING, I meant DOING REAL.

A living coward doesn't mean a living hero, they are two separate types of people, a living coward does not necessarily mean that he/she's going to burn the candle slowly, but blowing out the candle every time it gets a chance to spark.

For example, their's a baby trapped in a burning building, and you're the only person in position that CAN save his/her life, but then you decided that it was too risky so you ran for your own life instead...Do you think that others will later on see such attitude as a positive thing? Hell no.

Unless he/she regrets AND THEN DO SOMETHING GOOD ABOUT IT, like learning from his/her mistake, then overcoming his/her fear, and save MORE people in the future when he/she can. You know what I'm saying? It's all about having a Godly hearted feeling for others.

No Pain, No Gain.

Strong lives are motivated by dynamic purposes, their's a reason why we're what we are and not something else less capable of achieving the legends that we can make, therefore, we should use our wisdom on what's real, in order to do the right things and be a GOOD person, so that even in death, you will be triumphant.

Remember, life is a race, a race concerning who's the best, of the rest, so if YOU CAN be recognized throughout history as somebody great at the top of the honored list, why not?