I created a new debate that could prove to be amusing.

Hi LM...No problem at all. I figured something came up for you and that you couldn't continue the debate. It's quite all right and thanks for telling me.

I'm sorry for dropping out of our discussion about you know what. My silent withdrawal from the debate was my effort to avoid both implicitly and explicitly accusing you of things that I didn't intend. Why? I too battle within myself of mind and disposition.

Ask me anything you wish then, especially if you have concerns. I'm an extremely honest person and will not mislead you,,,,EVER! Chris

Thanks.

No debate desired. I am a father, and as such, my questions are for practical

reasons, not for any debate. The questions will not, in any sense, implicate you.

Hi LM...I'm fine with any questions you may have but don't expect me to linger in a debate. I've had it with the lameness here! Chris

Hello,

Are you comfortable answering questions that are centered upon the why of homosexuality? If not, I understand that no one wants to expose themselves in an arena that might just get themselves killed. For the record, I think the parents are not above reproach for the natures of their children; therein lies the questions that I would like for you to answer.

Hi Lawnman! I've read many of your debates and find them wonderful...in both your questions and answers. I think this will be a good way to go in order to get a quality debate going. I will certainly do what I can to help you do that. It's a tough question and you'll have many responses, I should think. Good luck with it. Chris

Hello,

I initiated a new debate, “Which is observable, evolution or creationism?”; as the moderator of the debate , I am inclined to think I am responsible for directing the debate in a logical manner. Any argument that strays from the question of the debate instead of following the question of the debate is my responsibility to identify. Lest I should think in a box, your input will be appreciated.

Also, do think that this approach will possibly be more indicative of an actual, reasonable debate?