3rd term and 4th term should be allowed in democratic system of government
i support the motion
Side Score: 5
|
i oppose this motion
Side Score: 9
|
|
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
2
points
1
point
I agree. Obama was one of those tyrannical Liberals who never found an unborn baby worth saving. His intolerance towards late term babies and even late term viable Special Need's babies is barbaric. He did his best to transform America into a welfare nation whereby a big socialized Government buys votes on the back of tax payer's money. With the millions of voters living off a tyrannical President's social programs, he could buy five terms in office while hard working tax payers had no say. That's called taxation without representation. Side: i support the motion
1
point
We don't have a democratic government, otherwise your vote would count equal to a Senator or Representative on the floor. Alas, you have no vote on the floor. We are a constitutional republic, which is where we get the word "Republican", meaning for the republic. Side: i oppose this motion
okay well it doesn't say "America" now does it? It says "democratic system of government" So answer the question and if you want to get technical about government terms, democracy actually means that everyone has an equal vote and no one represents anybody else, and therefore a Congress does not exist. Side: i support the motion
1
point
1
point
1
point
There is no president (or even presidential candidate) in modern times who is worth spending more than 4 to 8 years suffering under. If we exceed the 8 year maximum, it then becomes too easy for one party or the other to shift into a more monopolized regime. Side: i oppose this motion
|