Debate Stats:

Debate Score:181
Arguments:76
Total Votes:271
Ends:Never
View More Stats
install flash for graphs
Yes - they save lives No - it's a personal choice

Argument Tags:

side graph
All Tags
 
 No - it's a personal choice (2)
 
 Yes - they save lives (1)
 
 HOORAY FOR SEATBELTS (0)

Debate Creator:

iniquity(18)
pic



Are you trying to figure out how this debate works? Show Quick Tips

Should the US have seatbelt laws?

So we need seatbelts, but not helmets?

Yes - they save lives

Side Score: 85
VS.

No - it's a personal choice

Side Score: 96
Add New Argument
Add New Argument
Vote Up Vote Down
10 points

I think that seat belts should be mandated by law, because we all (society) ends up bearing the brunt of the cost for people who fail to wear their seatbelts.

In fact, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

It has been proven that seat belt laws increase the use of seat belts. Increasing the national seat belt use rate to 90 percent from the current 68 percent would prevent and estimated 5,536 fatalities, 132,670 injuries and save the nation $8.8 billion annually.

We all pay for those who do not wear seat belts. The higher health care and insurance costs that result from unbelted drivers and passengers involved in crashes get passed along to everyone.

For example, the costs of hospital care for an unbelted driver are 50 percent higher than those for a driver who was wearing a safety belt. Society bears 85 percent of those costs, not the individuals involved.

Thus, seat belt use should be mandatory.

Posted 202 days ago
- pic tonicole(629) Favored
Vote Up Vote Down
5 points

A seatbelt would have saved one of my cousins a couple years ago...

I agree completely.

Posted 123 days ago
- pic Mahollinder(93) Favored
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

Seat belts serve a few purposes: to keep us fastened to our seats in a relatively comfortable position, to protect us during vehicle accidents, and to protect others during the same accidents. One of the primary functions of a government - as a part of the social contract - is to protect people from themselves. And this is why we have policies like helmet and seat belt laws (in America).

Posted 202 days ago
- pic robm05(11) Favored
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I agree with what you're saying here, and a lot of what is being said here in favor of this. Seat belt laws do save lives because there is always that group of people who aren't intelligent enough to think wearing a seat belt could save their life and they won't do it. Be it personal reasons, the fact that wearing a seat belt is cool or whatever, some people need to be instructed in what they can and can't do. Not everyone in the world is a leader.

Posted 201 days ago
- pic Davey(6) Favored
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I completely agree. Why should we pay for other people deciding to play roulette with their own lives by not wearing a seat belt. It's pretty stupid that by law children under a certain age must wear a seat belt and then not enforce that for an adult person.

Posted 200 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

Agreed. An individual's rights end where other's begin. You cannot take a "personal liberty" or make a "personal choice" if you are putting others at danger. While seatbelts don't save lives 100% of the time [a friend of my fell unconscious while driving and was thrown out the door, and his car then crashed through a drainage pipe and was instantly crushed, he would've been killed no doubt about it], it is a very rare occasion that they are counter-productive.

The crux of the argument is that by wearing a seatbelt, you are less likely to lose control of the vehicle, putting others at risk, and since US laws aren't meant to restrict the individual but to help the group, they are a necessity at either the state or federal level.

By adding a seatbelt law, you give people a heavy incentive to wear a seatbelt and protect themselves, but more importantly, others.

Posted 199 days ago
- pic madgenius76(4) Opposed
Vote Up Vote Down
-1 points

Higher health care and insurance costs are due to the abundance of malpractice suits and insurance fraud cases brought forth by this "get rich quick," "sue happy" society. To say that society pays 85 percent of the medical care for unbelted drivers is ridiculous, because if that was really the case our insurance rates would be rising faster than gas prices. And considering there are approximately 304,106,367 people in the United States, the point of 5,536 estimated lives saved per year hardly seems like a reason to mandate a whole nation.

Posted 199 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

Yes, we need laws to protect everyone (or at least as many people as we can) from as many dangers as possible. We need to protect the human race at all cost. This can be facilitated getting people off the planet so that we don't have all of our eggs in one basket. And as we ship them up into space, we need to make sure that they are wearing their seat belts just in case they slam into a meteor heading towards Earth. That way they will survive and make it towards Mars to start anew. Since Mars is cold, they will have to start generating green house gasses to warm up the planet (but we're already pretty good at that). We need to spread humanity to the outer reaches of space and time. Since our television signals (especially today's news) would have preceded us, the universe will no doubt welcome us with open arms. It is our Manifest Destiny!

Posted 201 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

does anyone realize how many lives have been, are, and will be saved by wearing a seatbelt. with the decisions that people make....drinking and driving.... it would be stupid not to wear them. our country is trying to keep us all safe by giving us these laws. its a personal choice to obey the law or not, so if its a law you can still choose whether you want to wear them or not.

Posted 201 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

The choice not to wear a seat belt does not only affect the life of the individual choosing not to wear one, but also the lives of others. Increased costs to society through subsidized health care and emotional burdens on the family members of those killed in car crashes outweighs the individual's right to choose whether or not to wear a seat belt. The consequences of an individual's choice are not confined only to that person, thus the requirement to wear a seat belt serves to protect other people from one person's error in judgment.

Posted 199 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

My sister was in a car accident a few months ago and died instantly... if she had been wearing a seatbelt she would still be alive and my nephew would still have a mother.

The seatbelt law is one law that should be enforced everywhere. How hard is it to put on a seatbelt? Just by doing that small thing you could save your life. No one ever plans on getting in a fatal accident but it happens. And when it does you're not only paying the price with your life, your relatives and friends also have to deal with the loss of someone they loved and cared about.

Posted 172 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Seatbelts have reduced the number of vehicle-related deaths. The statistics speak for themselves.

Posted 201 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

It could keep the driver in his/her seat when the driving gets very rough (like right before and during an accident). That fact means that the driver has more control over the car (because he remains in his seat). That could protect others on the road , or in the car , or anywhere else, from getting hurt.

IF IT ONLY AFFECTED THE DRIVER, i would say it doesnt matter. But belts could help the driver stay driving. So theyre required

Posted 199 days ago
- pic ryaske(2) Favored
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

hell yah brotha!!

Posted 159 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

seatbelts ARE in cars to save lifes

Posted 111 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

What about the psychological damage an unfastened body can cause for others involved in the accident? Also, there is a good chance that the body itself can do further damage to other people or property after it is projected from the vehicle.

Posted 58 days ago | Tagged As: Yes - they save lives
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

Why would anyone be against wearing a seatbelt? Yes you can go on and on about the intellectual right to self determine if you are going to wear one, but in this instance, there is no reason at all for someone to NOT wear a seatbelt. It's a proven fact that they save lives and that they are not an inconvenience when driving. With that in mind, this law is not a violation of liberty, it simply makes sense in the same way that mandating car manufacturers to follow safety guidelines makes sense.

Posted 201 days ago
- pic PassingBy(29) Opposed
Vote Up Vote Down
4 points

It is a proven fact that smoking is harmful. But i am free to make a choice wether to smoke or not unless i am bothering others with my smoke.

It is a proven fact that drinking alcohol is harmful. But once again i am free to drink as much as i want unless i start acting criminally.

It is a proven fact that cliffhanging is dangerous. But noone starts a law against cliffhanging ye?

It is a proven fact that sportsmen get lots of injuries in tough tackles or doing hard tricks - are we going to deny that too??

Posted 201 days ago
- pic KelsoH(22) Opposed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

You get utility (enjoyment) from smoking. You get utility from drinking. You get utility from dangerous sports. Do you get utility from not wearing a seatbelt?

No you don't. That's why it is fundamentally different from those freedoms. By making those other activities illegal, there will be people who stand to lose a lot of happiness by not being able to enjoy those activities. In comparison, no one is truly bothered by wearing a seatbelt. If you are, then you are quite a unique individual.

Posted 200 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

The government has a moral responsibility to protect its people. End of debate.

Posted 199 days ago
- pic sparsely(308) Opposed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

To protect our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

At least in America, government is not meant to be an over-protective mother.

Posted 184 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

You guys don't have seatbelt laws?!

Posted 198 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

If Australia has to have seatbelt laws than I can't see how it's fair to Australians. There should be a global law in place that says "If one country has a law than all the World Leaders agree and decide to keep the law. That's why the US should have seatbelt laws.

Posted 130 days ago | Tagged As: HOORAY FOR SEATBELTS
Vote Up Vote Down
-2 points