A BUMP Stock turns a single shot weapon into an automatic. Should they be legal?
Uhhh, NO
Side Score: 3
|
 |
Don't step on my 2nd Amendment
Side Score: 3
|
|
|
|
|
The term "single shot weapon" is wrong. It has to be a semi-automatic weapon. A single shot weapon has to be reloaded after every shot ... like a musket! "Machine guns" have been illegal since 1986, the Reagan Administration made some "restrictive gun laws" .... imagine THAT! WHY would any sane individual want to turn a legal weapon into a "legal" illegal weapon?? How could a legal illegal "thing" exist? It stagers the imagination of anyone but a radical right winger who can't imagine anyone but a Trump using a personal email for White House business, but has NO trouble AT ALL with a legal SILENCED FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPON .... that is just like one that is not! I must be confused! The RIGHT side of my brain can't seem to absorb this "reality"! Guess I'll have to depend on the left side. ;-) Side: Uhhh, NO
1
point
Isn't that like the infamous German "grease gun" in WWII? I'd think there are no legitimate hunting or home defense needs based on squirting as many separate bullets as you can in a split second. Granted a shotgun is similar but that's still one target per one trigger pull. Side: Uhhh, NO
The grease gun was ours. I'm no gun nut but I'd love to shoot one just once. The M3 Submachine gun was designed by a GM automotive designer and built by a GM supplier of automobile headlights (Guide Lamp) which probably explains it's odd appearance which of course resembles a grease gun. Side: Uhhh, NO
|
1
point
|
