Don't need even a shred of evidence eh Con? Well, let us get "informed" real quick, shall we?

We have seen no evidence of "Russian collusion", which a few months ago we discussed isn't even a crime in the first place. This is why Mueller isn't "looking for Russian collusion".

The rabid liberal media then shifted to "There must be Obstruction of Justice".

The case for "obstruction of Justice" is based off Comey suggesting Trump obstructed. But...his memos contradict this claim. His memos in simple terms, prove Comey leaked classified information (a felony), lied to Congress and agents under oath (a felony), and that Trump didn't attempt to obstruct anything, but actually encouraged Comey to investigate "any satellites" further, meaning anyone in Trump's orbit.

So what crime is he going to prison for again con? I watched you give a shpeel about "being informed". It would take quite the OCD mind to " be more informed" than I am. But I digress.

Let's continue. McCabe demonstrably lied. He and Comey are calling each other liars as we speak.

Comey's testimony, book, and interviews contradict each other and his memos.

Peter Strock and Carter Paige are gone. Do we need to get into why?

Now for Comey. He openly admits that he leaked. He openly admits that he wanted Clinton to win. He openly admits that he "loved Obama and was sad to see him go." He openly admits he "has not seen himself as a Republican since about 2012" (6 years ago). He openly admits that he did not like Trump. He then openly claims he was proud of his wife and daughters for attending the Women's March. (Basically an anti Trump event)

Mueller is quoted as saying "Trump is not a target of any investigation".

So enlighten me as to how you go from that to "Trump will be in prison".