CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
3
True. Wait..., what? No!!!
Debate Score:7
Arguments:9
Total Votes:7
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (4)
 
 Wait..., what? No!!! (2)

Debate Creator

jolie(9810) pic



Abstinence is a good thing if practiced in moderation.

True.

Side Score: 4
VS.

Wait..., what? No!!!

Side Score: 3
1 point

Gotta get laid sometime ;)

Side: True.
1 point

My hundred year old Grandma used to say (back in the 60's), "Twice a week, and no more, in a year a hundred times and four." She outlived five husbands. Don't know if she followed her own advice, but, she lived to be a hundred, so......( I know, that's not really abstinence, just sayin').

Side: True.
1 point

I wonder why everybody leapt straight for the sexual interpretation of abstinence. Interestingly there is research to suggest that women who have more sexual partners have less stable marriages (Source 1). As such, I would suggest that women who wish to get married have less premarital sexual partners. The same isn't true for men, for a number of reasons including, among other things, differences in evolutionary sexual strategy and parental uncertainty.

Sources:

(1) https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability

Side: True.
2 points

Hello J:

Abstinence is NEVER a good thing.. We were put on this earth to fuck, and fuck we should..

excon

Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
AlofRI(3294) Clarified
1 point

Yeah. At 80 I STILL long for the "good old days"! "Keep doing what you should". (I'm TRYING, MA!) ;-)

Side: True.
outlaw60(15368) Clarified
1 point

CON is that why you on the Left support PPH ? Where does your confusion meet reality or does it ?

Side: True.
excon(18261) Disputed
1 point

Hello poochy boy:

So, right wingers don't fuck??? Is that what you're trying to say???

Now, SIT!

excon

Side: True.