CreateDebate


Debate Info

11
15
No. Yes.
Debate Score:26
Arguments:29
Total Votes:27
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 No. (10)
 
 Yes. (10)

Debate Creator

Sitar(3680) pic



Am I stupid for saving myself for marriage?


No.

Side Score: 11
VS.

Yes.

Side Score: 15

It depends on the shelf-life of what your saving is.

--------------------------------------------------------

Side: No.
1 point

No. To each their own. Just make sure you're doing it because that's really your own choice and not just because you were told that's what you're supposed to do.

Side: No.

No, of course not.

It's your choice. If you made it by yourself, there is nothing wrong in following it.

Side: No.

No, what you are doing is the moral mature responsibile thing to do.

Our welfre roles are filled with unwed mothers who are living this no fault anything goes sexual revolution.

The Left in this nation has done everything in it's power to censor any notion of moral values and the obvious benefits to saving oneself for marriage.

You see, those who believe in nothing hate any mentipn of moral values because it makes them feel insecure and bad about themselves. They do not want to admit that their anything goes no fault ideology is a complete irresponsible failure as we witness swollen welfare roles and broken families with no fathers at home.

Those on the Left are in a cultural war against our Christian heritage in this nation. They refuse to admit the obvious.

Did you see Grenache's response to you?

He said.... "To each their own. Just make sure you're doing it because that's really your own choice and not just because you were told that's what you're supposed to do."

Do you see his disdain for any argument lifting up moral values? He must instantly downplay such common sense truth, and defend those who live promiscuous lives.

No one is talking about forcing people to save themselves for marriage, but that is what he tries to infer with his post. He's trying to suggest you are just a blind brainwashed person being forced to live a moral life.

You see, in their insecure world, they are not bad people for choosing to sleep around. They are just living by their evolutionary programming whereby spreading their seed is the natural thing to do. We are all just animals acting on our instincts in their Godless world.

This way it is not their fault while they get women pregnant, abandon their children and women run down to the social progrms to live off others.

Side: No.
Grenache(6053) Disputed
2 points

Fascinating how he can make advice to you morph into me allegedly being amoral and another rant against Liberals. He in fact is the type of person who doesn't believe you should have a choice. Beware people who preach rules and punishments.

Side: Yes.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

AS ALWAYS....LIE, LIE, DECIEVE, DECIEVE.

I never said a thing about rules and punishment. I never said a thing about not having a choice unless of course it is a choice to kill. I said just the opposite!

This is why I ban you. You are constantly saying deceptive things to try and push your views. It's truly sickening.

Side: No.
1 point

Not stupid, no. But I think it is foolhardy to ignore one of the most important parts of a marriage and.....roll the dice....! Would you buy a pair of shoes without first trying them on?? You may find that very uncomfortable! The more you know about a situation you are getting yourself into, the better.

Side: No.
FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

You keep ignoring the DATA AND FACTS that those who live together first have HIGHER rates of divorce!!!!!!!

Tryng on those pairs of shoes DOES NOT WORK! What keeps marriages together are moral values and the vows that say till death do us part. I realize that vows and a person's word are old fashion in today's self love generation.

Side: Yes.
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

Why did Government get involved in marriage in the 1st place ? Got any clue ?

Side: Yes.
AlofRI(3294) Clarified
1 point

They didn't. They got involved in FREEDOM when the Constitution was ratified. The SCOTUS got involved in marriage when some "Americans" decided that some OTHER Americans shouldn't have the same freedom as others because of some Christian Bible lines.

A Law Professor once said: "Senator, when you took the oath of office you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You did NOT put your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible." I would put MY hand on the Constitution and do any "swearing" that was necessary, as did Teddy Roosevelt when HE was sworn into office, as I don't consider the Bible relevant. I hope that "clues you in".

Side: No.
1 point

No, its better to be in a committed relationship with someone before being intimate with another person.

It leads to less complications and a better relationship

Side: No.
AlofRI(3294) Clarified
1 point

Mine has gone on for 42 years ...after playing house. There are few "better relationships".

I think we ALL should do what WE feel is best, for US. You have my opinion, I have yours ... to each, his own.

Side: No.
1 point

In the heat of passionate embracing, or 'whatever', it is doubtful that the thought, 'should I save myself for marriage'? would cross the mind of any red blooded man or woman.

If you're with someone you love and the emotional 'temperature is rising' to beyond boiling point, then do what comes naturally, just as nature intended.

There is nothing dirty about enjoying sex and permitting the experience enhance a loving relationship.

It's usually only self righteous religious zealots or those with an abnormally low sex drive who try to make premarital sex seem sleazy as a form of self justification for their own religion induced madness or their below par sexual prowess.

Side: Yes.
Sitar(3680) Clarified
1 point

Isn't sex better if you are in love?.........................................................................................

Side: No.
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

You want Government involved in your sex life ?.............................................

Side: No.
Arsenal(220) Clarified
1 point

If you have to ask then it is obvious you never have had great sex. So until that time, if and when it comes, sure, save yourself for marriage. It's your loss, since there is no such thing as a god up there who is judging you, or even cares a fig about what you do between the sheets with some bloke.

Side: No.
1 point

Yes we have another yawner...................................................................................

Side: Yes.
1 point

but I thought you already lost your cherry when you were allegedly raped, mate? so how can ya be goin' on about savin' yourself? bit late now, in'nt? just curious, me.

Side: Yes.