An exercise in sophistry
I recently read a quote (supposedly from Socrates that said "Sophists can refute any proposition, whether true or false". It kind of hit home if you know what I mean. So I was wondering if I should just embrace that I am sophist. First though, I want to test if the shoe fits. Here present a statement that you personally hold to be true and I will attempt to refute it, no matter whether I agree with it or not.
Doing good
Side Score: 18
|
Not doing so good
Side Score: 13
|
|
|
|
1
point
1
point
I hope not. I have to admit though, I kinda enjoy constructing meaning for the world and then tearing it down. Christianity was fun to overcome, now utilitarianism is falling apart, my next attempt is going to try and accept meaninglessness so we'll see how that goes. I actually fear finding meaning, because then the search will be over! Side: Doing good
|
2
points
The creation of the illusory semantic distinctions supporting the false dichotomy you refer to, is not the primary cause of the harm to which you refer. Rather, it is the stubborn tendency to regard ourselves superior to others that causes it. There are many other Us vs Them false dichotomies through which this tendency is expressed. They are designed to create the illusion of significant and serious differences between large sections of people who in truth share practically identical core values. The logically untenable distinction drawn between religious and non-religious is a mere symptom of deeper issue, in and of itself it is not harmful. Side: Doing good
That argument might show that a mathematical system that contains this statement can't model the world, but it doesn't show that the statement itself is wrong as seen from within a mathematical system. Can you show that this statement is mathematically wrong? Side: Not doing so good
|