Animal Testing x
it hurts animals to have cosmetics and botax inot their skin to try and make a change
for animal testing
Side Score: 7
|
 |
against animals testing
Side Score: 11
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
1
point
1
point
There are many natural medicines that do not have to be tested on animals Such as? Most pharmaceuticals, even though tested on animals, are still toxic to humans with many side effects. It is far more advisable to test chemicals on a working mammalian system before you give it to a human, denying this is willfully putting human lives at risk. A pointless waste of animal life. I'd rather them than my wife or children. Side: for animal testing
1
point
I said it in the last animal testing debate so I might as well say it again. Imagine someday when you're an adult, that you have a critically ill baby daughter. Now imagine her dying because you didn't want Fluffy the bunny to test the medication needed to save her life. Is that a good trade-off; your baby daughter's life to save some rabbits? Side: for animal testing
1
point
|
3
points
2
points
It's a horrible thing, there are hundreds of animals being harmed. What if a person asked you "Is animal testing wrong?"and you say"No,their just animals"and that same person gives your kid some kind of chemical to test out and their going to say "He/She is just a human":( Side: against animals testing
2
points
1
point
1
point
Animal testing is just another human cruelty towards animals. I am all for human testing. Let's see who wants to volunteer to save the lives of other humans. I don't see a line forming just yet :) Humans are a plague on the earth, believing to have more rights than anything else living here. Side: against animals testing
1
point
Are you lining up? No, but I'll bet you'd be more than happy to take the medicines if you were dying or wouldn't hesitate to condone their use to save a loved one. Humans are a plague on the earth, believing to have more rights than anything else living here. Sanctimonious much? Side: for animal testing
|
