CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:4
Arguments:5
Total Votes:4
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Anti-Gun Hillary Clinton (4)

Debate Creator

outlaw60(15368) pic



Anti-Gun Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton is campaigning on a war against gun stores, gun makers, and gun owners, yet she has spent decades of her life—perhaps the majority of her life—enjoying around-the-clock armed protection either for offices she occupied or those occupied by her husband Bill Clinton.

For example, Bill Clinton was Governor of Arkansas for 12 years (1979-81 and 1983-1993). It seems fair to presume the governor and his wife enjoyed armed security and transport. And Bill Clinton’s departure from the office of governor coincided with his entrance into the White House, where he served as president from 1993 to 2001. Upon entering the White House, the armed security went to its highest levels, as the president and First Lady Mrs. Clinton were surrounded by defensive Secret Service teams, tactical response teams, and integrated law enforcement and military personnel wherever they went.

Why is it these Leftist Elitist are so anti-gun when they are protected by guns ? 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/24/anti-gun-hillary-clinton-enjoyed-taxpayer-funded-armed-security-decades/

Add New Argument
1 point

Liberals see a connection between registering guns and keeping guns out of the hands of crazies. In fact and in practice, there is no such connection ------- soooooooo 😳

1 point

Hillary is NOT anti-gun, she just wants what the (real) majority of Americans want, a vetting of those who would buy them! NRA conservatives are so scared about "terrorists coming into the U.S., yet they don't worry one bit about how easy it is to arm themselves after they get here! THEY DON'T BRING THEM WITH THEM! They rely on the NRA to make it easy! I'm a proud liberal, I own guns and do not wish to give them up any more than Hillary (or Bill) wants us to. Make it harder for the terrorists, cons ... you'll be glad you did!

1 point

The problem I have with your line of thinking is that we already have a system for vetting people who want to buy guns. It sounds like you are trying to add people who haven't yet done anything wrong.

AlofRI(3294) Clarified
1 point

The "system" we have is WAY to ineffective! It didn't used to be, back when I was a proud member of the NRA. Today though, the arrogance, fear and attitude in America has changed ....WITH the NRA, and needs a heavy working over! I have always owned guns. Neither Obama OR Hillary wants to "take them"! There are FAR more radicals today. For some reason certain people are more worried that Obama wasn't properly "vetted" than someone who NEEDS an assault weapon!