Are Nom and FM the same person?
Yes
Side Score: 15
|
No
Side Score: 5
|
|
|
|
2
points
Yes. Factmachine is his original personality type. Nom is simply a pretend personality type. My theory is that the nom personality type actually agrees with much of what you say, but its hatred for anything to the right of it causes it to oppose you on everything at all costs. The Factmachine personality type is the real person. It is American rather than pretending to be British, hates Islam, regular liberals, Jews, etc, and has a tiny form of common sense as opposed to the trolly psychopathy of the Nom personality type. Perhaps he has split personality or is simply a sociopath. I conclude they are the same because they both have these things in common over the long game of time of me debating them. 1)Both have claimed at some point to be musicians. 2)Both use the word "retarded" at an abnormal rate. Side: Yes
2
points
3)Both hate Jews 4)Both use the term "Zionist" 5)Both have used this exact wording: "I hate religion because it encourages racial bigotry and in-group preference." Side: Yes
1
point
5)Both use the term "goyim animals" http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Side: Yes
1
point
You are literally retarded and insane for referring to Nathan as me. Only a schizophrenic nut case would be that paranoid and delusional. -Factmachine http://www.createdebate.com/browse/ Side: Yes
One and the same to me anyway ....... FactMachine(432) 1 point Semen flavoured cunt berries. The death penalty is useless when you could just use nanobots to alter their brain tissue and then shoot seven rays of divine Aether emanations from David Ickes nipple Chakras into the criminals pineal gland to put them on the frequency of love and compassion. 1 year ago Side: Yes
|
1
point
The point? He's either a troll with absolutely no life, or a psychopath. Or two different people from two different countries using two different versions of English. You seem to have omitted that possibility. I've noticed that you and Amarel both love omitting information. Care to explain that for us good buddy? Side: Yes
I've noticed that you and Amarel both love omitting information. You mean I quote people. Since every quote necessarily omits everything else a person said, you pretend it is a dishonest practice. I suppose that’s why I am able to quote Marx to illustrate my point about Marx. While local commies can only kick and scream that I am omitting everything else he said, which they are incapable of quoting even a little. FM hilariously screeched that my quotes do not count because I am no authority, while he apparently is. Except that he couldn’t support his position with even one thing that Marx ever said. You are the same, but simpler. Which makes me wonder if you are even a person, or just a figment of FM’s twisted mind. Side: Yes
|