CreateDebate


Debate Info

2
3
Yes No
Debate Score:5
Arguments:5
Total Votes:5
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes (2)
 
 No (3)

Debate Creator

Grenache(6053) pic



Are Sexuality Distinctions Artificial Constructs of Culture?

Before you chime in based on preconceptions it's good to read this article.  http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170315-the-invention-of-heterosexuality  Because apparently "heterosexuality" as an identity is new within just the last century.

Yes

Side Score: 2
VS.

No

Side Score: 3

No natural distinctions are constructs of culture, and all cultural distinctions are. The latter can never be derived from the former, like the is-ought problem.

Now make your pick which one you are talking about, and the answer shall be clear.

Side: Yes

No natural distinctions are constructs of culture, and all cultural distinctions are. The latter can never be derived from the former, like the is-ought problem.

Now make your pick which one you are talking about, and the answer shall be clear.

Side: Yes
1 point

That's a repeated argument.

Side: No
1 point

I find the article interesting, and I don't doubt the recent history it shares is correct. But I think the ancient history of procreation and marriage make it really hard to win the argument that no one was "heterosexual" until the word itself starting getting used in print at the modern times referenced in the article.

What I indeed DO buy is that the modern angst over 33 kinds of gender and whom uses what bathroom and whom can sleep with whom is a drummed up hysteria based on little actual importance. Just let people be people.

Side: No
1 point

Biology drives sexuality. The distinctions, as all distinctions are, are humanly applied categorizations. But in this case, they are applied categorizations of natural phenomena. As any gay or straight or bisexual man or woman will tell you: sexual attraction is an urge, a feeling, not a choice.

That's not artificial, anymore than the need to take a piss is artificial.

Side: No