It's unlikely that every single element of our history has been rewritten

This is not a refutation - just a speculative assumption

The fact that you acknowledge the difference in men and women in court props that you know that there are still strong differences between the ways men and women are treated in our society.

While it does show differences - it shows differences in favor of women. Men are ridiculously discriminated against in court.

And again, if you believe that men had a huge advantage for a large part of history, why is it so easy for you to believe that all of it has swapped?

And this is a complete straw-man. As I acknowledged there are disparities in favor of men - my argument is that they are far outweighed by those enjoyed by

Women are constantly objectified and sexualized in the media in ways that men are not.

There isn't anything wrong with sexualization - objectification is nothing more than attraction, which is fine.

there are still far fewer women in power than men.

Which is because women tend not to go for political positions - its a proven difference in the way that our brains work. Additionally - women make up roughly 50.4% of the country. Women hold over half of the vote, so it is utterly ridiculous to claim that the disparities in political positions is because of discrimination seeing as we live in a representative democracy.

Let's look at a few recent studies. This study submitted two identical job applications to several hundred locations

And, AS I ACKNOWLEDGED - this is a disparity in favor of men. My argument is not at all that these don't exist. My argument is that they are outweighed by the disparities in favor of women, such as court bias. Court bias is infinitely more detrimental here.

And while the 'wage gap' statistic is often misused, it is true that women tend to have lower paying jobs than men, even when they are doing the same work.

Not while doing the same work - but yes they tend to have lower paying jobs. This is because women tend to apply for jobs with lower paying salaries.

Harvard has engineered a test called the "Implicit Association Test." If you have time, I suggest you check it out

I did, and got "Your data suggest little or no association between Male and Female with Science and Liberal Arts." Although the test was fairly clearly designed to create association within it (ie confirmation bias). It established the perimeters and subjected you to them - then changed them and "expected" the same results.

Women are objectified in a way men aren't.

And we have biological reasons as to why. It isn't something that came about purely out of discrimination - its embedded into our DNA. Now, is that a reason to stick with it? No, not at all, however to simply place blame is counter productive and an extremely dishonest way to go about it.

While plenty of men get eating disorders, women are significantly more likely to suffer from an ED, something most commonly brought on by societal pressure

And men make up 97% of all combat fatalities, 80% of all suicides, and 77% of all homicide victims.

Woman are catcalled on the street. A lot. That doesn't happen to guys. And yes, that's a somewhat small thing, but very significant.

It can either be somewhat small, or very significant. Additionally, "a lot" is an exaggeration.

Women get raped a whole heck of a lot more than men.

38% against 62%, so yes this is true. However it is a much smaller disparity than most make it out to be (your lack of a statistic only goes further to show this.)

There are far fewer women than men in many academic areas such as: computer science, engineering, various realms of STEM, music composition, accounting and finance, comedy, cooking, law enforcement, emergency services, politics, construction, and many others.

Largely because of biological differences (see here: http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context;=hcoltheses). .) But again, yes stereotypes do exist. And biology is not the only explanation here. Additionally - before someone doesn't read the article and thinks I'm saying men are smarter, I'm not. There are legitimate biological differences that govern what people are interested in, women tend to be more interested in people-centric jobs, or jobs that help others on a personal basis. STEM fields generally cannot provide this, hence there are less women.

To be clear, I am very aware that men face many disadvantages in our society that women do not. However, that does not invalidate the very real, very present, and very important problems that women face that we simply cannot ignore.

Nor am I saying we do so.