I'm all for it. It's often more swift and just than the lengthy court system. Either some guy tracks down a murderer and beats him to a pulp, or he gets arrested, gets a lengthy and costly trial, then costly jail time. It rather kick his ass or execute the death penalty ourselves then waste time and money on these people.

I say...if the vigilante is a moron that only causes more trouble, then arrest them and punish them to the full extent. If the vigilante can get the job done by only capturing and containing the crook until the authorities get there, then I have no problem with it. I like the fact that it's against the law because then people would be less motivated to become a vigilante. It would cause much chaos if just anyone thought they could catch criminals.

I think vigilantism is needed because the cops aren't willing to do what they need to for specific crime but I'm not hating on the cops it is just seeming that they aren't realizing that vigilantism is was keeping cops lower and there offended in the way that they don't think they are legal. Vigilantes are all the same.Would you arrest the arrow, probably, but most people would not arrest a women who dresses up in a costume and helps with the homeless people cause.But you arrest a man who punches a few men in the face with guns pointed at him and he is in a costume. Thank You come again.