Are you angry about this?
Yes,
Side Score: 3
|
 |
No.
Side Score: 6
|
|
|
|
|
I have a question for those who aren't. But first, no I'm not angry about it, just .....scratching my head. It's cruel to force the woman who was raped to have any contact at all or allow her child contact with the one that raped her. Now. My question, and it's really that I'm curious. To those that are thinking there is no issue with this. What if the woman raped a man, had his child and sued him for child support? Should she get it even though she raped him? Side: Yes,
|
2
points
According to the Bible Deuteronomy 22:28–29 28 “If a man meets a virgin who is not betrothed, and seizes her and lies with her, and they are found, 29 then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days. Side: No.
Oroven rapists don't have the right to hold their victims hostage though the "justice" system or be around anyone under the age of 20. In fact, proven rapists should be killed. You cry baby liberals make me sick. I would absolutely abort before I gave my baby to a rapist. Side: Yes,
1
point
What if he was a gentle rapist? Like, he gives her something to fall asleep and then he makes quiet, gentle, slow love to her? No yelling, nor screaming. No physical violence. No blood shed, nor bruises. No jack hammering. An then, when he's done, he gives her a soft kiss on her lips and then cuddles her until morning. Would it be ok then? ;) Side: Yes,
There is nothing to suggest that rapists with adult victims pose a sexual risk to babies. You cry baby liberals make me sick. You are the one crying about this. I would absolutely abort before I gave my baby to a rapist. You would abort a baby to punish a rapist. You sick fuck. What the hell is wrong with you? Side: No.
|
