Are you for or against child labor??
What do you think about child labor? Is it good or government should prohibit child labor?
For child labor
Side Score: 13
|
Against child labor
Side Score: 13
|
|
|
|
1
point
That is not child labour. That it children working for their family through desperation. The meaning of child labour is "work that harms children or keeps them from attending school" (http://www.continuetolearn.uiowa.edu/ Side: Against child labor
i am not speaking about the work harms children or something like that. i am speaking about work which is not so hard for example in Nike factories. i don't think that this kind of work can harm children's health. what about attending school i want that if their parents allow them not to attend the school why is it problem? Side: For child labor
I think that some types of working, which are not required physical efforts should not be forbidden. I'm talking about singing, dancing or something like that. actually it is child labor too, because they earn some money. so they can combine bussines with pleasure. Side: For child labor
Dear Esim, i think that you don't know differences between child labor and child work. where child work is considered to be part of the children’s training to be responsible adults and children like what they do. However, child labour is thought to be exploitative Side: Against child labor
1
point
it is not only to be exploitative!!! if read carefully the definition of child labour it is includes a lot of shpere where people can earn money. now i'm talking about show business, which including singing, dancing, playing different roles! young generation get money for this, actually they just show their talant and improve their skills, why it should be forbidden??? Side: For child labor
There is an international duty on governments to uphold the dignity of man. This can only be done with the independence gained from education, a good quality of life and independent income. Child labour destroys the creativity and innocence of the young, and must be stopped. Side: For child labor
1
point
Apprenticeship was considered a very good idea, children learned a trade and became professionals later in life. Present day education does not prepare children for the working environment, they also do not understand the value of money. There was never a sole earner in a family, everyone worked to survive. The system has developed in which before the man of the house was the only one working for the entire family, but as economic circumstances changed both parents worked. That too has pr oven to be a failure. In an economic crisis - parents also also lose their jobs - how is the family going to survive? The answer lies that everyone pools in - including the children. Isolating people and making them sole earners does not not help - no person can ever be sure that his or her job will continue and will continue making the same amount of money. The family as a unit makes money for itself. Part of it goes for food and shelter, the other goes buying things for oneself without depending on someone else to get them. In earlier days children were apprentices of carpenters and tailors. Those professions have gone. With changing times, children have pr oven to be good at programming computers - just one example. Ultimately it is the value of money is what they learn. Parents can remain unemployed for prolonged periods - that is not good for the family. Side: For child labor
I am for child labor, that is any form of safe labor performed by a child for a fair wage. Coddling children does not do them any favors. It is essential that they learn the workings of the adult world before entering it, rather than being blindsided by it when they turn 18, and being completely unprepared, and totally irresponsible. "Public Education" does nothing to assist in this necessity, the only way to learn it is to experience it yourself, and you do that by working. Apprenticeships, assembly lines, arts and crafts, farm labor, these are a few of the things that children should be permitted to engage in for a wage. It really does them a disservice to prevent them from working, especially if they want to. Laws prohibiting child labor should have instead pushed for safe working conditions, decent hours, fair wage, and encouraging apprenticeships, in all disciplines. Side: For child labor
|
Children are in their developing stage. They are physically and mentally developing. In their growing years they must focus on education, and let their body develop rather than work in factories where they are subject to intensive work they cannot handle. Side: Against child labor
1
point
For me there is a BIG NO to child labour. Firstly children are still young and may not be able to handle the pressure or do the job as well as an adult would. Children would be to immature, too dependent to actually work properly. It is dangerous for them too. Side: Against child labor
I agree with Tima.also consumer power has proven highly effective in the past in forcing trans-national companies to institute ethical practices. Boycotts of one producer lead others to act out of fear of negative publicity - the market takes care of the problem itself. Side: Against child labor
1
point
That only occurs if people are empowered, motivated, and informed. It isn't reliable and corporations can often hold out in-till people need to buy from them, since often their competition can't increase their production quick enough to take on the extra demand soon enough. It might take months to install a new machine, and it will take weeks to decide to do such for large companies. Most of the time all a corporation has to do is keep quite, hope the media doesn't blow up the issue which they won't so long as it isn't too big, and wait out any boy-cotters. Most consumers can be replaced, large segments of them don't matter to a large company because their not really significant to the bottom line in till they become large enough. Side: For child labor
1
point
1
point
|