Debate Stats:

Debate Score:55
Arguments:22
Total Votes:61
Ends:Never
View More Stats
install flash for graphs
Yes No

Argument Tags:

side graph
All Tags
 
 yes (2)
 
 No (1)

Debate Creator:

Time2Golf(257)
pic



Are you trying to figure out how this debate works? Show Quick Tips

Are you willing to pay $15 to check one piece of luggage?

Better start packing light!


Yes

Side Score: 17
VS.

No

Side Score: 38
Add New Argument
Add New Argument
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

I fly to often with work. So I will have to pay depending on the airline. The sad thing is that I will have to pass these costs on to my customers. With recreational flights I will probably also have to since $15 is still cheaper than having to drive 800 miles or more. Which if I drove would cost me over $155 dollars in gas not to mention the time.

Posted 194 days ago
- pic InvisaWoman(34) Opposed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

However, if the airlines constantly lose your luggage shouldn't they first fix their system then charge more.

Posted 193 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

Airline prices are already insanely deflated and subsidized. $15 to check a bag is chump-change next to the cost of the high-octane jet fuel they have to fill a plane with. Frankly, if the $15 dollars went to- I don't know- actually researching an alternative to air travel that uses less fuel (blimps anyone?) I would be more than happy to donate it.

Frankly, the $15 you don't pay to check your bag has to get paid by someone. The mere fact that the industry is still considered profitable is proof that someone other than the airline companies are footing the bill. Most likely, its the federal government, which means we end up paying for it anyway.

Posted 194 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

I haven't flown in so long that I have forgotten what the "norm" is. So, if I were to travel by air, and if the airline were to charge me to check my bag ... I suppose I'd pony up the dough and get on with it.

My best guess is that all of the airlines are struggling under the weight of increased fuel costs, and are doing the best they can to maintain operations and continue to earn a profit. This surcharge-on-luggage is merely an effort to charge more to make up for the increased cost of jet fuel.

It takes energy to travel. Even if you were to walk from place to place, you'd have to eat (ingest energy) in order to make the trip. And guess what, it also costs more to eat today - due in part to the increased cost of oil.

What we could really use - is a leader with vision, and a national goal (similar to our commitment to put a man on the moon) to develop and put into use a source of energy other than fossil fuels. I have no doubt that, if we put our collective minds to it, the United States of America could say "good-bye" to our dependence on oil.

Posted 194 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Only $15? Delta charges $25. Frankly, with oil prices so high, its a reasonable expense, albeit, surprising and annoying.

Posted 194 days ago
- pic sparsely(308) Opposed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

After the american government bailed out the airlines for milions to "stay afloat" after 9/11, and throughout the ensuing war (which is largely about the commodity being blamed for the high prices)? No. This is a way to make the consumer/taxpayer pay coming and going. It's called externalization, and you're footing the bill by being complacent consumers and living off the information and conclusions the television reaches for you.

Supporting Evidence: Externalities (en.wikipedia.org)
Posted 193 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Charging for luggage is one way for the airline to recover fuel price increases. To be fair, however, they ought to weigh PASSENGERS and luggage, and charge everyone the same rate per pound! Otherwise, I'm going to wear a week's worth of clothes onto the plane. :-)

Posted 194 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I'd pay to minimize the hassle going through security. It's bad enough with a laptop.

Posted 189 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

No wonder Obama is doing so well selling us all on becoming a welfare state. We all want more pay, free health insurance, tax cuts, but we don't want to pay for the services we use. We get what we deserve, not what we want. If YOU are upset about having to pay more for gas, what is so hard to understand about an airline having to charge more when gas prices go up? Whether they should raise prices instead of a bag charge is moot to me. Either way it costs me $15, right?

Posted 48 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Not much choice for most travel. But if I'm going somewhere for more than two weeks, I'd definitely ship all my stuff.

Posted 48 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
7 points

In the age of controlled toiletries on checked baggage, one piece of luggage is become mandatory for even the shortest flight. I additionally object to the one carry on rule. It should be my computer bag plus one carry on.

Posted 194 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
5 points

I will probably just start carrying on as much as I can. Of course, if I'm traveling with my golf clubs I will have to check those going forward and fork up the extra $15, but I will definitely not be happy about it

Posted 194 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
5 points

Well this is a hard one because I wouldn't want to pay $15 dollars to have a bag checked yet at the same time how much are they going to raise the ticket prices to compensate for the gas hike? So it is kinda six of one half a dozen another.

Posted 194 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
4 points

We shouldn't have to pay to check in luggage. It should be complimentary with the flight, because we already decided to fly with that airline and not a different one.

Why are they charging anyways ? is this some kind of scandal to suck more money out of us ?

Posted 120 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

I'm not "willing" to pay for a service that's always been free. However, if they all follow suit I may be forced to pay.

Good thing I try and pack it all carry-on anyway.

Posted 194 days ago

Just one more reason to not fly AA.

Posted 194 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

It's like they assume that you don't need to bring clothing with you. This is the most horrendous abuse of consumers ever. However, i do not think the government needs to do anything about it, consumers won't fly American or will bring more carry on luggage. Or if i really gotta go somewhere maybe I'll ride the rails because this is stupid.

Posted 193 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

They should pay me! I pay a ton to fly, then wait an hour to get my stuff, which isn't always there...

Why charge for luggage?

Posted 190 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I would rather the airlines figure out how much they need to charge to make a profit and price the tickets accordingly. I am really getting sick and tired of being nickel and dimed. From a customer service perspective the $15/bag thing sucks! Just imagine a family of 6 about to leave for vacation and then they go to checkin they have to pay $90 cash (assuming 1 bag per, which is conservative!).

Posted 194 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I don't think "willing" is the correct word. I'm not willing to pay $4 a gallon for gas to drive to work .... but if I don't drive to work I won't have $4 to buy a gallon of gas. I'm not willing to pay more for anything ... whether I have a choice is an entirely different matter.

I don't WANT to pay $15 to check a bag ... typically when I fly on business it's all carry on ... but when I vacation with my family that's $60 !! The cost of a good dinner!

It all needs to be considered in the final cost. If you have the flexibility, shop around compare costs, consider ALL extra charges and then book your flight. It's all economics ....

Posted 193 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I don't fly, but it seems like they're turning into banks: a fee for every single thing they can get away with. If the flight costs base price + add ons that aren't really add ons, why not just be honest and charge the real price?

There is something fundamentally dishonest in doing this, really. It shows a definite, very thinly disguised contempt for their customers.

Posted 192 days ago
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

No way Jose. And United just upped the price of checking a second bag to $50!

Posted 77 days ago | Tagged As: No


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Newsletter Archive
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Sitemap
Sharing Tools
Send Beta Invites
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Legal Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Creative Commons

©2008 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.