Beef Ban
Yes
Side Score: 9
|
No
Side Score: 6
|
|
|
|
3
points
In some ways I feel like a country shouldn't ban something on religious grounds. Allowing one religion to have monopoly over the laws of a country can lead to escalating situations where the country becomes a totalitarian theocracy. For example, women in Saudi Arabia not being allowed to do anything without a male relative's permission. However, consumption of beef is not a right, and if the majority of the population supports the ban then it should stay. I would have said a fairer course of action to non-Hindus would have been to allow the consumption of beef in private property, but ban it from being sold by street vendors and in restaurants. Side: Yes
"However, consumption of beef is not a right, and if the majority of the population supports the ban then it should stay." I strongly disagree with this. There isn't any codified right to have homosexual sex either. I apply the same logic to beef consumption as I do to homosexual sex. One must respect the rights of others to do as they please as long as they don't harm others or infringe upon the rights of others. Side: No
|
2
points
India is a secular country which does not have a state religion which is favored by the government. But the present scenario is not that. The beef ban is a way of telling that Hinduism is superior to other religions. This goes against the beliefs of secularism included in The Constitution. If beef is banned, then why not ban pork also. By banning beef, the government tries to favor a more dominant religious group. This also goes against other visions set forth by the Constitution as minority religious groups are not given a thought and are denied their rights. In the section of fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution, it is clearly stated that every person has the right to follow and practice any religion of their choice. It is very wrong of the government to issue a legal notification to ban beef and that this law should be thought and debated on once again and appropriate changes need to be made that act in the favor of everybody. Side: No
Banning beef is not a good alternative as India is a democratic and secular country and peoples fundamental right to consume food of their choice should be respected and allowed irrespective of religion . Those who want to consume can do so while does who dont want to shouldnt . This way it wont hamper anyones fundamental rights as well as freedom. Side: No
|