CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:24
Arguments:36
Total Votes:30
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Behold, this is what an antichrist sounds like (14)

Debate Creator

dadman(1703) pic



Behold, this is what an antichrist sounds like

Behold, this is what an antichrist sounds like .. https://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=28703 ... On the surface, 
they sound as though they believe and live the Bible, but oh so so far away ... God help those who might be deceived by this > re-occurring < ideology ...... 
those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it < Jim Jones (atheist / Socialist / Communist) 1978
Add New Argument
2 points

I am supposed to care how fictional stone age characters felt about another fictional stone age character ? Why ?

1 point

2 points

Thanks for clearing that up Ming it’s been keeping me awake for months

Thanks for clearing that up Ming it’s been keeping me awake for months

Lol.

1 point

1 point

Whew gagging at the smell of testosterone fogging up the debate There's no way to argue logic with religion. You argue logic with logic and religion with religion. Religion is subjective, even if you think you're right, because guess what? Every religion thinks they're right and there's no way of proving any of them without using religious sources, so you can mention it and say it's what you believe, but you can't expect everyone else to agree with you because it just doesn't make sense. The only concrete fact about the bible, for example, is that it was created a very long time ago by many men who edited and cut out whatever they wanted from the material and chose what ultimately was part of it. And on top of this, it was translated into a ridiculous amount of languages hundreds of years before it even got written in English, AND there are tons of English versions as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_translations

"The autographs, the Greek manuscripts written by the original authors, have not survived. Scholars surmise the original Greek text from the manuscripts that do survive." Like, the original text isn't even with anyone to show how accurate translations are.

Bottom line, don't try to fight religion with evidence-based logic or vice versa?

1 point

The only concrete fact about the Bible, for example,

is that it was created a very long time ago by many men who edited and cut out whatever they wanted

from the material and chose what ultimately was part of it

--------------------- Making a case-for-the Bible < escape the pooled ignorances

panjen(8) Disputed
1 point

I never said everything in the Bible is untrue, or that it isn't based on truth or anything like that. I'm just saying it's not a reliable source for fact. No matter what anyone says, the details of religion are not provable. Like nobody can prove what prophets saw, whether they saw God or not. I personally do believe in God, and most people do. My only point was to not act like one could ever convince someone to believe using their scriptural evidence, because it only counts as evidence to the people with the same beliefs.

1 point

"Behold"

Does anyone really talk like that nowadays? Who says that?