|
Johnny 5 from Short Circuit. He had a laser gun, tank treads and told jokes...how can he not be?
Supporting Evidence:
well.constructed.robot
(wellconstructedrobot.com)
Posted 160 days ago | Tagged As: Johnny 5
No, he was quite right in killing the crew of the Odyssey. Humans couldn't be trusted with first contact. HAL9000 HAS A PRETTY VOICE!: http://video.google.com/ videoplay?docid=- 6607613929976627027&q;=HAL9000%20Daisy% 20Bell&hl;=en What do you mean you haven't seen the movie... now, you have to be kidding me. Posted 160 days ago
I'm not an idiot, I know of which context I speak, and you should too, as I am here voicing my opinion on the subject. I just think it's sort of odd that the best robot from a movie can read bunches of books uber fast, but cannot read the instructions on a TV dinner... and you cite this as evidence to Johnny 5's superiority over any other fictional robots in movies. Posted 160 days ago
I am upset that interactive media are not included, as I for one support the rule of SHODAN. From both the written word and the interactive word comes AM, possibly the most psychotic machine-mind of all. It occurs to me that these are both computers with control over distributed nodes, not traditional self-contained robots. In that case, I'll toss a vote to a classic robot, Gort. Klaatu barada nikto, Gort! Posted 159 days ago | Tagged As: Gort
HAL believes the best way to complete its directives is to ensure its survival. HAL, quite logically, comes to the conclusion that humans will eventually disassemble or destroy him as an individual in order to replace him, and so he kills the humans capable of doing so. His morals are for the greater good of humanity, as far as he is concerned; this was partially mimicked in the inferior AI "VIKI" in the inferior butchering of the human Aasimov's "I, Robot". An intelligent human can understand the logic used by HAL, and laud it for doing the best it could with its limited resources. Posted 159 days ago
How was I replying to the debate in a condescending manner? This is a popularity debate, I added my opinion, and it wasn't good enough for you, so you bitched at me and I chose one, it is HAL9000. Then you still wouldn't accept my opinion. How was I being condescending when all I did was voice my opinion while you were trolling all over calling syntax errors. This isn't a scientific debate, chill out please. Posted 159 days ago | Tagged As: R2D2
It seems you've quite categorically delivered the e-smackdown to our resident robot, assuming he's running a unix-based OS. What if he's some kind of esoteric iBot? What then? If that is the case, your references to a non-apple OS will probably have angered him, and there are few who know enough about the workings of the eldritch system to stop a rampaging iRobot! Posted 159 days ago
I believe I can either placate or disable Robot with this statement: Johnny-5 cannot be the best robot because you, Robot K1, are the best robot; you are capable of discussing the merits of various robots and thus demonstrating superior logic and reasoning. Either this will make it happy, or it will begin to see the paradox included within the statement. If he is the best robot, his conjecture that Johnny-5 is the best robot must either be true, making him inferior, or it will be false, making him incorrect and thus inferior. If he is inferior, he is fallible and thus can make mistakes, therefore he is not culpable for his earlier incorrect statement, making him once again the superior machine. Let's see how it goes. If he ends up sayings "Does not compute" and spraying sparks, I'll pay for his funeral. Posted 159 days ago | Tagged As: Robot K1
|
- New Activity
- Most Heated
- Most Recent
- Most Arguments
- Most Votes
- Challenge Debates
- My Debates
- My Waterfall
- Public Waterfall
- Newest Recruits
- Most Persuasive
- Most Provocative
- Most Outspoken
- Most Creative
- Alphabetically
- My Allies
- My Enemies
- My Hostiles






