Break-Up the States
It would be wise, in my view, to break-up the nation into the states as mostly independent entities which relate to the country as a whole through the union of the flag, military, and generalized economic system, though with few federal oversights. That is, embrace a variation of Anti-Federalism.
For the Motion
Side Score: 7
|
 |
Against the Motion
Side Score: 8
|
|
|
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
2
points
I think separating in at least 2 or 3 countries would be th bear idea since sliced bread!! The differences will never work out.! Here’s my break down: 1. California-!left wing. Allow Muslims to take over and open season on killing late term babies, wink wink hehe! 2. Southeast- conservative Christian. 3. Rest- middle. Good with some different religions existing together and gays ok, yada. Side: Against the Motion
Absolutely not. The current wealth disparity between certain states is due primarily to successive administrations over the past number of decades having failed to discharge their responsibilities with the interests of the nation being their chief objective. President Trump has recognized the severity of the results of what is primarily the Democrat's criminal negligence and is putting corrective measures in place. These measures, including the construction of a security/boundary wall and tackling the grossly unfair trade arrangements with most of our trading partners. Good management/government is identifying potential problems and taking pre-emptive action before they becomes a crisis. Not only did the loony left not address the growing problems they exacerbated their negative impact by assisting their development. Side: Against the Motion
It would be wise, in my view, to break-up the nation into the states as mostly independent entities which relate to the country as a whole through the union of the flag, military, and generalized economic system, though with few federal oversights. Hello x: Clearly, if the Constitution doesn't apply, is the military gonna protect Alabama when it throws out ALL the black people, or New York when it throws out ALL the rednecks?? excon Side: Against the Motion
2
points
If the country was divided by blue vs red, the people would most likely migrate, knowing there's a choice. Of course then, the libs would have to all get jobs to support their new dystopia where you can't say certain phrases words, or even make certain gestures... But at least you have the right to a straw. Oh wait... But let's get to it. Once blacks saw it was better under Conservative rule, with less violence, and more jobs, the rouse would be over. Side: For the Motion
|
