CreateDebate


Debate Info

25
25
Uhhhh, NO Sure. That's WHY we have guns
Debate Score:50
Arguments:48
Total Votes:54
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Uhhhh, NO (20)
 
 Sure. That's WHY we have guns (21)

Debate Creator

excon(18260) pic



Can an armed right wing militia DEFEAT an Apache Helicopter??

Uhhhh, NO

Side Score: 25
VS.

Sure. That's WHY we have guns

Side Score: 25
2 points

You're spot on. Even if every hunter, farmer, sportsman, vigilante, boy scout, and good ol boy, all simultaneously rose up and attacked the US military they would fail to prevail. The only way they'd have a fighting chance would be if substantial segments of the military joined them. And the problem with that is neither the foot soldier composition of the military nor it's top brass have enough in common with your average white NRA fanatic to be willing to turn traitor and fight to the death about it to help them.

Side: Uhhhh, NO
Negligentt(397) Disputed
2 points

They are the children of NRA fanatics. Why do you think most vets hated Barack Obama and love Donald Trump?

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
Amarel(5669) Disputed
1 point

Your average white (really?) NRA fanatic does not want to fight the US military. If things were ever so bad that gun lovers did want to fight the government, a portion of the military (brass and enlisted) would agree (lots of gun nuts are in the military). They wouldn't join the citizen gun nut, they would lead it and the gun nut would join them.

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

When 60% is white that's literally the definition of "average" in composition. It's not ALL white, but the average still is.

Time will tell. But I don't think you're right.................................................................

Side: Uhhhh, NO
excon(18260) Disputed
1 point

Hello A:

Man, you got that myth down.. But, to you, it's a truth.. My, oh my.

excon

Side: Uhhhh, NO
DBCooper(2194) Disputed
1 point

Who want's to rise up to attack the US Military and when did this issue come about. Got some factual information you can produce.

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
jeffreyone(1383) Clarified
1 point

err. Then it means who ever leads them is not intelligent. and there is also not any other intelligent person on the team.

let anyone sponsor the show 1/4 of bill gate's networth.

I will finish off the U.S military and kill four heads of states in a day including trump the ultimate.

Ex. 9/11 after the incident, bush went to the scene with little or no security, there could have been a second bombing or a sniper waiting.

Ex. When there was a recent bombing in russia st.peterson's road, putin' went to the scence. There could have been another explosion upon his arrival with three snipers in disguise awaiting for more attempts.

One could distract the body guards by first shooting one. Then two focus on putin'.

When there is an explosion at the statue of liberty, i know there will several heads of states there.....easy easy finish off at a go with a second explotion and snipers.

Side: Uhhhh, NO
0 points

Hello:

Some people think they actually COULD defeat the US Army.. I'm NOT one of them..

excon

Side: Uhhhh, NO
2 points

American has a population over 300 million. If we decided the military had to be defeated, we could do it. We don't have to defeat their hardware. We only have to defeat those who use it. A knife, in a dark ally, will do that. Now they have a chopper without a pilot.

There is also a civilian weapon that can take out a light tank. That Apache wouldn't stand a chance.

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
xljackson(260) Disputed
1 point

Rofl You plan take out the super power of the world's top military leadership one by one with 'A knife, in a dark ally', that's really cute...

Like I suppose maybe you could get one if you got lucky and caught them off guard, but the next day he's replaced, meanwhile your little resistance is being hunted with the full weight of the american military till you and whoever was dumb enough to go along with you is either dead or in a cell for life.

'Now they have a chopper without a pilot' LOL Heard of military drone champ?

Side: Uhhhh, NO
DBCooper(2194) Disputed
1 point

You worn out EX VET you off your meds ? Some people think they COULD defeat the US Army ? Who are some people !

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
DBCooper(2194) Disputed
1 point

EX VET couldn't the Navy that you claim to have been part of just strike America from Federal Waters.

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns

I believe, if the Army was ordered to fire on civilians, many of them would join us. I know that if they ordered me to do it, I would refuse. I'm sure most of them share my feelings about it.

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
1 point

What are they armed with?

Can an Apache Helicopter defeat ISIS?

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
excon(18260) Clarified
1 point

Hello A:

They're armed with the arms allowed under the 2nd Amendment.. I, again, COULD have been clearer, but I was referring to the right wing myth that their pistols and hunting rifles are the ONLY thing keeping the Constitution in tact.. Or, something.. I'm not sure.. You can SEE that mentality at work RIGHT HERE, on these pages..

No, "an" (as in ONE) Apache Helicopter cannot defeat ISIS. Why do you ask?

excon

Side: Uhhhh, NO
Amarel(5669) Disputed
3 points

They're armed with the arms allowed under the 2nd Amendment

The 2nd Amendment isn't explicit on this matter.

I was referring to the right wing myth that their pistols and hunting rifles are the ONLY thing keeping the Constitution in tact

Obviously the 2nd Amendment doesn't do all that. But your debate goes further than this.

No, "an" (as in ONE) Apache Helicopter cannot defeat ISIS. Why do you ask?

Our military might has failed to subdue armed guerrilla populations of far smaller countries. I don't know why they would be more effective here.

Side: Uhhhh, NO
2 points

Can a helicopter survive a suicide attack by an army of crop dusters...

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
DBCooper(2194) Disputed
2 points

EX VET arms are allowed under the Second Amendment you have some confusion with that. Pistols and Rifles are the ONLY thing keeping the Constitution in tact... Or something...I'm not sure. Yes i see the mentality of you Democrats.

Side: Uhhhh, NO
Cartman(18192) Disputed
1 point

No, the only mentality we see is the stupid fucking liberal argument. You don't need guns to protect yourself from the government because the government is so evil they will kill you any way.

No, "an" (as in ONE) Apache Helicopter cannot defeat ISIS. Why do you ask?

If an apache helicopter can't defeat citizens in a country that the pilots have not been sworn to protect, how the fuck would an apache helicopter defeat American citizens?

Side: Uhhhh, NO
1 point

You also forget that the vast majority of pilots aren't liberals. Those guns would turn on the government before they turned them on their own families...

Side: Uhhhh, NO

Of course we can defeat an Apache. All we'd need is to create a big wind turbine. They'd go into the death spiral. Apaches aren't birds. Of course, option B would be to take them down with fighter jets flown by a military that has very few Liberals in it...

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
1 point

Hello again,

So, it appears the right wing DOES believe their militia will defeat the USA.. Gotta love 'em, bonkers as they are?

excon

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
DBCooper(2194) Disputed
1 point

Take a nap you 74 year old EX VET because you need it in the worst way.

Side: Uhhhh, NO
1 point

When was it EX VET you rotated out of Vietnam. Do you remember.

Side: Sure. That's WHY we have guns
excon(18260) Disputed
1 point

Hello DOOSH BAG:

You WISH you had the balls to protect your country, but instead you hid under the blankets.

excon

Side: Uhhhh, NO