Can't We All Get Along?
Sure?
Side Score: 13
|
 |
No Way!
Side Score: 20
|
|
|
|
|
2
points
Thats a pretty hard mission. To get 8 billion people to agree on one thing? but hey, I think we get a long pretty well. I mean, considering that we are 8 billion people living here, I think its amazing how well we do get a long. I'm amazed that there isn't war everywhere we look. I know war is taking place in many countries. But I live in a war-free country, I know of lots of war-free countries. Side: Sure?
1
point
1
point
1
point
I say that we should but it's not going to happen. Opinions are the cause of it. For example, when I see black people yelling and screaming at my school, I call them Nggers because they're ignorant black people however I consider a ngger as an ignorant black person just like a redneck is an ignorant southern white man or a chink is an ignorant asian. Some of you are going to argue the use of the word with me, we both get mad, and we end up not getting along. It's not going to happen but I want it to. Side: Sure?
1
point
1
point
I think it's possible. We have made progress in that direction. Violence is seen as more of a last resort now. Also, the idea that people should be free to make their own choices (as long as they're not hurting anyone else) is more acceptable. There are a lot of people in the world, but it is possible that each individual could "get along" which does NOT mean that they have to agree with everyone else. It just means we could all coexist peacefully. Side: Sure?
Well, there's a vast casm between arguing and beating someone nearly to death. To be fair, he was high as shit. But in reality a high white person driving from the cops for forever would not have had the shit beat out of them for it, nor a famous person, so there you go. I'm generally for debate and against beating the shit out of people after they obviously were under control. Side: Sure?
|
oh yeah, people think i'm a friend of my family's because i have none of their features. they all have brown hair, and i have blond. i have hazel eyes, and my family members have blue. which is slightly weird because most people who have blond hair have blue eyes. Side: Sure?
1
point
1
point
No, we can't. There will always be Sroms (pl.) (ignorant and insecure member of this site) who believe that the Earth is 6,000 years old, women are subordinate, and gays should be stoned to death, as said in the Christian bible. What's the word for these people, again? Oh, yeah: zealots. Side: No Way!
Whilst I agree that it is impossible for everyone to get along (we all have different opinions) and it would make this site pretty boring if we all agreed. I think it is possible to have friendly debates without resorting to insulting people we dont agree with which I think is as close to getting along as we can, you can be friends with someone whose views you dont agree with. As I said I dont think a debate should be used to have a go at people whose views we disagree with or settling scores. Let people argue their corner and if their argument is flawed they will prove it by not being able to hold up their end of the debate Side: No Way!
1
point
This debate is three years old! You leave arguments on several old debates of mine every day. Now, normally that would be fine except that you're not really interested in actually debating or interacting with anyone. Every time you post on some old dead debate of mine it notifies me. It's really annoying to click on my notifications only to discover it's just another pointless post of yours. Side: Sure?
|
