Well if you can bring up the fact that pretty much every civilization had some spiritual belief- whether in God, kami spirits, or whatever- than even if you don't have conclusive proof that religion exists, you can respect it as something that has a major place in society.

Argumentum ad populum. This is an acknowledged logical fallacy. Simply because many believe an assertion, it is not necessarily true. Whether it must be respected or not (and I believe not), is irrelevant.

Then there's the fact that the Bible or the Quran or the Old Testament are filled with examples of miracles and it's a stretch to say that every single one of them was from hallucinations or made up.

Can you demonstrate, logically or otherwise, that any single miracle (which are by definition in conflict with some scientific law, principle &c;.) in any of these works actually happened?

Failing that, do you acknowledge that the probability of any one such event happening may be attributed a probability of effectively 0, unless first the existence of a God is proven?

And, accepting the previous axiom, that miracles cannot happen in the absence of a God, and that no miracle has been proven to have occurred; do you accept that a book describing such miracles cannot be submitted as proof of the existence of God?

None of this is full proof that God exists of course

I submit that none of it constitutes any form of proof whatever, complete or otherwise.

just that some spiritual entity may live among us

Nor, I submit, does the body of articles that you present prove even that. You have perhaps demonstrated that many people, or some people, believe that such a being exists, and that there might be some aspect of the human nature that impels them to that belief.

This doesn't really mean that He/She/It is perfect though

Perfection is a necessary prerequisite for a state of divinity, which is a state ascribed to the concept of God that I presume to be the subject of this debate.

or all we know, it can be malevolent and hates us.

The books previously described by you all assert that this is not the case, and are therefore entirely irrelevant to the argument for the existence of a morally ambiguous spirit.

Then there's the fact that the Bible or the Quran or the Old Testament are filled with examples of miracles and it's a stretch to say that every single one of them was from hallucinations or made up.

No, not really. People thousands of years ago like to tell tall tales. Telling stories was a principal means of human relation as well as explaining unknown phenomena before the development of modern science. Every culture has it's stories, it's no more likely that the stories of the Hebrews are true than the stories of any other culture on earth.