I thought it was already proved, it isn't? 1 sandwich = 2 pieces of bread 1 woman = 2 boobs 1 child = 2 creators 1 time = 2 trips to the clinic etc.
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
Please don't include such sexual humors in my debates, if you don;t mind! i just want my debates to be junk-free!
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
Please don't include such sexual humors in my debates, if you don;t mind! i just want my debates to be junk-free!
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
Nope nope nope. You are all wrong. As we have evolved and become more sophisticated (or less depending on how you look at it), women can have 1 boob, and children can have only one creator. (;
42 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
yes i can and its the stupidest question but ill show you how 1 zero = 2 zeroes (add zeoes as many times as hell it is zero only) (by mathematics) 1z = 2z (zero=z, let us assume) therefore 1= 2 x z/z (at last z is equal to z so cancelled) 1=2 (the final answer)
41 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
This is one explanation: 1.0=2.0; then, cancelling 0 on both sides, we get, 1=2. HENCE PROVED! The dot in between indicates Dot Product>
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
This can be proved other wise: let a=b, a and b are Natural Numbers. (a+b)(a+b)= a.a + 2.a.b + b.b = b.b + b.b + 2.a.b => 2(b.b + a.b) = 2(a.a) => 4(a.a)=2(a.a) Now by dividing both sides by 2(a.a), we get 2=1; Hence proved!
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
Ok, so let's let a=3, then b will also equal 3. (3+3)(3+3)= 36.
43 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
Well no offense, but the whole point of the proof is to not plug in numbers until the end. It's not meant to be legitimate math, just a coincidence of math. :)
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
when a=3, then b=3, true! But, Once, assumed as a variable, then its value differs. Besides, the prof does not stand for the variables, That means that even if a=infinity, the above proof is true! But it is too complicated to understand!
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
The first one easy and simple, while, the second is hard and confusing, but they both are right. But you need not worry, it is ignored as a simple game math!
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
one times zero equals zero. two times zero equals zero. one million times zero equals zero. We can't cancel the zero, because you must multiply it first. You cannot divide by zero, because the world would blow up. Thus, 1 does not equal 2.
43 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
No, Ashley, you need not multiply before cancelling. The reasoning in math is clear: if a x b = b X c; Then you directly cancel b, don't you?
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
No, Ashley, you need not multiply before cancelling. The reasoning in math is clear: if a x b = b X c; Then you directly cancel b, don't you?
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
Come on, Ashley, this is just a comedy debate, and you need not use all the math principals here! just use your humor and you get some fun and relax your mind!
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
Come on, Ashley, this is just a comedy debate, and you need not use all the math principals here! just use your humor and you get some fun and relax your mind!
43 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
a = b a + 2 x 5 = b squared ba = 2 x 5 squared b a n a n a s is bananas 5a = 5b But when you implement the affect of gravitiy the force becomes directly pi Exept when snoop dog is shagging his ho and so 1 = 2
43 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
That's a good one! The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
42 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
That's a good one! The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
42 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
yes man just take your own example 1 man=2 balls 1 boy =2 girlfriends
42 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
No, Ashley, you need not multiply before cancelling. The reasoning in math is clear: if a x b = b X c; Then you directly cancel b, don't you?
42 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
This does not apply when b=0 because technically, mathematically, the reason you are able to cancel out a multiplier in an equation is that you are dividing by it on both sides and it "cancels itself out" And again, you cannot divide by zero.
41 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
No, Ashley, you need not multiply before cancelling. The reasoning in math is clear: if a x b = b X c; Then you directly cancel b, don't you?
42 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
42 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
39 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
The problem is the 'subtract by (a-b)' part. Taking the assumption in the first part that a = b, then a - b = 0. You cannot divide by zero.
39 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
True, but if you are Chuck Norris you can. (; And since the numbers are still in variable form it's somewhat more acceptable. AND, no one knows what 0 divided by 0 is, so it might be ok. (;
39 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
Very interesting ! however students of algebra will realize of course that, when you find it necessary to define two variables, it would have to be only because they are expected to be different i.e. a cannot = b; only then there is a need to define two variables of a and b. it is a violation of the rules of assigning variable names of 'a ' and 'b ' when both the variables are equal to one another. Thus the construction of the equation a=b on the reason that a=1 and b=1 is wrong ( I am commenting on the video titled amazing math trick that proves 2=1 )
20 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
1 molecule of hydrogen = 2 atoms of hydrogen .......................................................................
27 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
|
Hey that is a really funny video! i think i should up vote you! there you go!
42 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
Hey that is a really funny video! i think i should up vote you! there you go!
42 days ago | Tagged As: Oh Yeah
Oh! That was kind, I think I'll up vote BOTH of those! I agree, I liked the video too!
42 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
LOL that was hilarious! Haha I gotta show that to more people
43 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
If you take the derivative of both of them then you get: 1' = 2' since: 1' = 0 and 2' = 0 and 0=0, BUT that is the derivative, that is not the actual number itself. So sorry, no dice.
42 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
Since 2 is defined as 1 + 1 (at least in base 3 and above), 2 != 1. If 1 = 2, then mathematics would fall apart because everything would equal everything else. Example: 666 = 1337 (which may or may not be true ;) ). Proof by contradiction: 1 = 2 1 + 1 = 2 + 1 2 = 3 Since 1 = 2, 1 = 2 = 3 Repeat: 1 = 2 1 + 1 + 1 = 2 + 1 + 1 3 = 4 Since 1 = 2 and 2 = 3, 1 = 2 = 3 = 4 and so on. You can also go in the negative direction: 1 = 2 1 - 1 = 2 - 1 0 = 1 However, 0 is defined as 0 + x = x and 1 is defined as 1x = x by the existence of 0 and 1 axiom. Therefore, if you try to substitute 0 for 1 or 1 for 0, you get contradictions: 1 + x = x and 0x = x. Since an axiom cannot and must not be contradicted, 1 != 2.
39 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
1.0=2.0, ok but, 1/2=0/0! This is not correct, is it! also, 1=2x 0/0 is not correct as well! This is because: any thing by 0 is not defined!
39 days ago | Tagged As: OH NO
|