CreateDebate


Debate Info

11
5
they should live in city they should live in coutryside
Debate Score:16
Arguments:10
Total Votes:16
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 they should live in city (7)
 
 they should live in coutryside (3)

Debate Creator

Aigul455(26) pic



Children should grow up in the big city

nowadays the issue whether children grow up in the city or in the countryside is widely debated. The issue is very important because it concerns the development of next generation. 

The most people tend to comfortable conditions, the better education and health care. But the city shops are full of modified food. Meat, chicken, added growth hormones in, are delivered from the factory farms. So the last time people started to think about bringing up a child in a healthy environment, and that he eat only natural organic products. so there are advantages and disadvantages in living in the city.

they should live in city

Side Score: 11
VS.

they should live in coutryside

Side Score: 5
2 points

First of all Education their children receive at school is much better than in villages. A lot of preschools, kindergartens where they can prepare for school. children have the choice to attend any school language, physical, mathematical, musical, or art school where he studied.also there are a lot of teachers graduated and practiced abroad. there is no colleges or universities, no institutions of higher education in the villages.

Side: they should live in city
Bakulia455(19) Disputed
1 point

But in the villages, though not in such great quantities as large cities but also have mugs, rural houses of culture, or clubs where kids can learn to sing, chess,dance,and rural children have a huge advantage in that the environment in which they live is much cleaner than the cities. There are no factories, a lot of cars that pollute the air, water, causing damage to the wildlife. Thus children in the villages of fresh air and less subject to diseases of the respiratory tract. That is growing healthier.

Side: they should live in coutryside
Aigul455(26) Disputed
2 points

Although the environment in the country is cleaner and children grow up healthier and stronger, living in big cities they have the opportunity to receive quality medical care. Urban hospitals and clinics are equipped with the best new equipment. And so even infant mortality is lower than in the countryside. If it is necessary, there are more possibilities to find the required medicine as there are a large amount of pharmacies. The best doctors always tend to work in clinics where there are many patients, where they can get more experience, and where the salary is higher. so it is easer for children to consult the best specialists

Side: they should live in city

I grew up in NYC, and i think it raised me as a much tougher and more capable human being. in the country, as calm, quaint and beautiful as it is, there's really nothing going on that would teach you anything about life. in the city, there's everything going on, and there's a lesson to be learned, a tip to be picked up, and a drug dealer to steer clear of on every corner!

Side: they should live in city
1 point

I was fortunate enough to be a part of both big city (Rochester, NY) and small rural town (Holdenville, OK) growing up. I lived until I was five in OK but lived primarily in NY where I went to school and would visit my father 2 months in the summer. I ended up loving the southern hospitality and rustic nature of the people in my dads town and even moved to that small town after I graduated Highschool. In rural areas I noticed that the people were more in cohabitation with nature, boys would go out to the pond to catch fish or snatch up little critters like frogs or crawdads and even the girls wouldn’t be squeamish about getting a little dirt on their knees. When they grew to teenage years it was not uncommon to see them take up horseback riding or go muddin with four wheelers. I loved this environment, with the close nit community where the grocery store clerk knew you were from out of town at first but then over the years would comment about ‘the kids from NY’ being back in town.

Aside from the obvious benefits that a rural community has to offer regarding personal relationships, I would still consider a city to be an ideal place to raise a family, but this is just personal preference in the end anyway isn’t it?

One of the many reasons I would choose a big city is for education benefits, I remember talking with the kids in the summer who were in the same grade as me always seemed to be a little behind in their curriculum. Even my brother, who passed 1st grade and had good marks in OK, ended up having to repeat it when we moved to NY due to not meeting their standards. This is reason enough for me to personally think that the education was lacking in OK if not most rural communities.

Another thing that I noticed in my trek back and forth over the years is that although big city dwellers are often more liberal, and I find myself agreeing with conservative viewpoints more often than not, they were also very tolerant to individual rights and minorities. From what I have seen, people on average in rural areas are more likely to be discriminating towards people of different creeds or even nationalities, which to me is a big problem in the world today.

One more issue I have with rural towns is that they tend to be a lot more religious, christianity being the dominant faith, I think that that pretty much speaks for itself as a reason why I wouldn't want to raise a kid in a 'village.'

Interesting to note though, that I have a daughter, and I currently live in a small town in OK :)

Side: they should live in city
1 point

Children in this generation should be raised by other babies younger than them. If they grow up not learning anything well, hey, they tried right? Its much better than being raised by unintelligent cows or something totally absurd like that. BABIES FTW.

Side: they should live in city
2 points

State pays great attention to the level of literacy in the villages and therefore they emit grants and benefits to rural children for admission to higher education. So they can get a university education. Also young professionals who have studied and returned to the village of rental housing is allocated.

Side: they should live in coutryside
Aigul455(26) Disputed
2 points

but children living in cities receive not only high-quality school-wide knowledge but develop culturally and spiritually. in the cities there are good conditions for it: numerous theaters, museums, exhibitions of famous artists, as well as countless number of various sections, circles, and service clubs such as music, acting, cinematography, various kinds of sports where they can exercise and develop their abilities and in the future it will help them in choosing their profession.

Side: they should live in city
Bakulia455(19) Disputed
2 points

Children who growing up in the village grow in a healthy atmosphere. They use an unmodified, natural, organic food, since most families keep livestock, are farmers and vegetable production. While in meat, poultry are supplied with a factorization Farms. In addition, the children keep their own farm, doing manual labor being long in the fresh air, they grow strong, seasoned, strong and hard-working as opposed to urban children who spend all their time at home sitting in front of TV or computers.

Side: they should live in coutryside