Debate Info

5
3
For Against
Debate Score:8
Arguments:6
Total Votes:10
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 For (3)
 
 Against (3)

Debate Creator

Micmacmoc(2154) pic



China's 'One Child' Rule

In 1979 it was decreed in China that, due to overpopulation, Chinese people were allowed no more than one child. What do you think?

For

Side Score: 5
VS.

Against

Side Score: 3
2 points

If you're so against it, then please, by all means, come up with a solution for the hundreds of millions of children that you'd have to feed, house, educate, entertain, etc.

Until then, please shut the fuck up about a very difficult decision that the Chinese government had to make. You think they wanted to make it? Sometimes hard decision have to be made.

All of those children, if they were born, would be starving in the streets as we speak if it weren't for the one child policy.

Do I believed in forced abortions? Of course not, that's a horrific thing to do.

329 days ago | Side: For
1 point  

Well i wish it wasn't so, i wouldn't want this, but technically any kind of animal is designed so that it can increase its numbers. The (average) woman has two mammary glands, thus is meant to have two children. Two children, meaning that this way the species will grow more. Our planet is all ready over populated, and having just one child might help to stabilize things. It has worked in China so far, despite the odd person getting away with two because of some disease, or they have a lot of money!

329 days ago | Side: For
1 point  

People don't like being told what to do even if it's the best thing for the planet. Someone has to lay down some rules, because sometimes not all people are conscience enough to plan for the future.

329 days ago | Side: For
1 point  

no. it's not right to take someones life. i have 2 other siblings, even though they are a pain in the butt sometimes, i still wouldn't vote for the one child rule. and if this rule was in the U.S., i wouldn't be alive right now.

329 days ago | Side: Against
1 point  

The Chinese government can simply deal with the economic costs of overpopulation through peaceful means, including, but not limited to, downsizing entitlement programs. No government should determine the course of someone's life, that right belongs to the individual. The reason why resources become a problem for society is because its members are forcibly integrated into each others' financial past decisions by a tax economy and the bureaucracies that "operate" by it. The greater the level of inclusion, the lower the level of sustainability. By binding people economically, the inevitable result will be to limit the indulgences of individuals who are otherwise more than capable of handling them and to encourage the indulgences of those who can't.

311 days ago | Side: Against
0 points

Nobody should ever be prevented from bringing new life into the world. It is the opposite of death - something nobody likes.

330 days ago | Side: Against
Popular Debates in Politics: "The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer" this is the Republican philosophy? Do you believe that the vast majority of conservatives are utter hypocrites? Libertarians are right about taxes.



About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2013 TidyLife, Inc. All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Debate Forum | Big shout-outs to The Bloggess and Andy Cohen.