CreateDebate


Debate Info

25
14
Not christian should be stoning someone now
Debate Score:39
Arguments:35
Total Votes:48
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Not christian (17)
 
 should be stoning someone now (14)

Debate Creator

FactLord(149) pic



Should Christians stop being pussies and follow their own damn bible?

Christians aren't supposed to eat pigs either, and you are supposed to stone homosexuals and witches to death. Why are modern christians such pussies who don't even follow their own religion?

Not christian

Side Score: 25
VS.

should be stoning someone now

Side Score: 14
2 points

Another total hypocrite who judges Christians, while ignoring his inhumanity towards our most innocent unborn lives.

Do you vote for the Democrat Party?

If you do, you support No Restriction abortions of viable babies for any reason up to birth.

So why not stop being a wimp and speak out against the Democrat Party for their inhumanity of dismembering viable babies. Is tearing a viable baby limb from limb nicer than stoning someone?

Side: Not christian
FactLord(149) Disputed
1 point

Another total hypocrite

Nothing I'm saying makes me a hypocrite.

who judges Christians

Yep.

inhumanity towards our most innocent unborn lives.

Fuck em'

Do you vote for the Democrat Party?

No.

If you do, you support No Restriction abortions of viable babies for any reason up to birth.

That's a total lie. First of all very few democrats actually support that and second of all I actually support the no restriction abortion of the entire human race no matter how old they are, including the unborn.

So why not stop being a wimp

How am I a wimp just because I don't spend my whole life whining about people aborting their retarded little brats and whining about your religious freedom to be retarded and believe in demonstrably false garbage that was made up thousands of years ago by uncivilized cave dwelling troglodyte barbarians.

speak out against the Democrat Party

I actually do, just not for dismembering viable babies because I actually support doing that.

Is tearing a viable baby limb from limb nicer than stoning someone?

I don't care which is nicer, I only care which is stupider. This debate isn't about morality, it's about the fact that the only thing stopping christians from being just as bad is radical muslims is the fact that they don't follow the bible.

Side: should be stoning someone now
1 point

Hey Nom. You know what I get pleasure from? Destroying your arguments to the point that out of embarrassment, you are forced to create more puppets. I feast on that. Anything else?

Side: Not christian
FromWithin(7683) Disputed
1 point

Your type of inhuman hate does not deserve a response.

By the way, almost the entire Democrat Party does support No Restriction abortions. They almost unanimously vote to keep it legal.

IGNORE

Side: Not christian

Jesus didn't use Ceremonial law, and gave us the New Testament. At least know basic doctrine if you're going to attack a religion.

Side: Not christian
FactLord(149) Disputed
1 point

So everything God said in the old testament is erased because Jesus? Jesus can over rule God now?

Side: should be stoning someone now
1 point

If you don't understand that God vowed to change the covenant at the appointed time in the Old Testament, Jesus is God in the Bible, and that Jesus created said new covenant in the New Testament, you're way out of your league.

Side: Not christian

STONING

John 8 New International Version (NIV)

8 1 but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.

2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. 3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” 6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. 10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”

11 “No one, sir,” she said.

“Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+8&version=NIV&interface=amp

Side: Not christian
FactLord(149) Disputed
1 point

At no point did Jesus say "stoning is not a valid form of punishment". But God did say it IS a valid form of punishment.

Side: should be stoning someone now
1 point

This is actually true. But he did say that a sinner wasn't qualified to cast stones.

Side: Not christian

FOOD

13 Therefore let us not pass judgment on one another any longer, but rather decide never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of a brother. 14 I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself, but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean. 15 For if your brother is grieved by what you eat, you are no longer walking in love. By what you eat, do not destroy the one for whom Christ died. 16 So do not let what you regard as good be spoken of as evil. 17 For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 18 Whoever thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men. 19 So then let us pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+14:13-23&version=ESV

Side: Not christian
FactLord(149) Disputed
1 point

nothing is unclean in itself, but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean.

Cool, so christians think it's ok to eat poop.

Side: should be stoning someone now
1 point

Devolved from rational coherant thought, eh lord? Maybe thst's why atheism isn't winning.

Side: Not christian

FOOD

15 Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, 2 “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!”

Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. 7 You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:

8 “‘These people honor me with their lips,

but their hearts are far from me.

9 They worship me in vain;

their teachings are merely human rules.’[c]”

10 Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen and understand. 11 What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.”

12 Then the disciples came to him and asked, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+15&version=NIV&interface=amp

Side: Not christian
FactLord(149) Disputed
1 point

What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them

What if it's a dick though?

Side: should be stoning someone now
Antrim(1297) Clarified
1 point

Now fartbreath, that's more like your type of argument.

If you can't win by reason introduce meaningless lewd comments.

Side: Not christian
1 point

Muslims need to stop being pussies and follow their own damn bible

Well they are in both senses. You got you some problem with Mooslimes ?????

Side: Not christian
1 point

It's a valid point. It seems the bible used to be taken very literally, but is now taken figuratively instead. Being a christian used to mean a very different thing in the past, to the point where you could consider modern christians being a separate religion.

Side: Not christian
-1 points

You don't care about this, you just want to blaspheme, but I will engage. After church, I will debate you if you want. http://www.bible.ca/ef/expository-hebrews-9-15-17.htm Hebrews 9:15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.

Side: should be stoning someone now
YeshuaBought(1930) Clarified
0 points

There is a Bible verse in Hebrews, lemme fin it for you...................................................

Side: Not christian