CreateDebate


Debate Info

7
14
Perfectly fine, I'm OK with it WTF?!
Debate Score:21
Arguments:13
Total Votes:24
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Perfectly fine, I'm OK with it (5)
 
 WTF?! (8)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40163) pic



Perfectly fine, I'm OK with it

Side Score: 7
VS.

WTF?!

Side Score: 14
2 points

This site is turning into crazy right wing malitia support group. You guys on the other side sit around patting eachother on the back for your backwards views all day long.

The article clearly says they start "99%" of meetings with Christian prayers. They shouldn't begin any government function with psychotic babbling to mythical characters of any sort, but if they are going to anyway, who the hell cares which mythical character they're babbling to?

For a group who cry about "individual freedom" at every opportunity, you on the other side sure do put your nose in other people's business a lot.

Side: Perfectly fine, I'm OK with it
1 point

trust me, no matter how sound your logic is, on the matter of Muslims, conservatives only see OMG TERRORISTS HELP US AHHH!!!!!

Side: Perfectly fine, I'm OK with it

I think it's more like, OMG! Terrorists! Lock and load one 20 round clip into your M-16 and put the selector mode on Rock-N-Roll :)

Side: Perfectly fine, I'm OK with it
3 points

It's inappropriate for a government institution to encourage, endorse, or support any specific religion. If they felt a need to show solidarity towards their Muslim neighbors, there would have been many other options rather than an explicit endorsement of Islam by the city.

Side: WTF?!
2 points

Separation of Church and State means, to liberals, Separation of the Christian Church and State, whereas it's fine to allow the religion known to be a major source of terrorism throughout the world to fuse with the State.

This is why we've got that pesky (to liberals) second amendment!

Side: WTF?!

No doubt!! .

Side: WTF?!
casper3912(1581) Disputed
1 point

Do you really believe its a source of terrorism, because that seems like such an oversimplification of many complex and long acting social forces. How about we blame terrorism on colonialism, or imperialism, because those have to do with it as well, or how about genocide(because so and so invaded).

The Demonification(ha, made up word) of enemies has always been a long standing practice, but it also seems to often be overly general and apply to categories which include more then your opponent. Perhaps this makes it seems like there are more then there are, justifying more extreme acts by amplifying the perceived threat.

Side: Perfectly fine, I'm OK with it
TERMINATOR(6780) Disputed
1 point

Do you really believe its a source of terrorism, because that seems like such an oversimplification of many complex and long acting social forces. How about we blame terrorism on colonialism, or imperialism, because those have to do with it as well, or how about genocide(because so and so invaded).

Muslims have been waging war against the Christians since Muslims founding.

Demonification

Demonization.

Side: WTF?!

We need a new reality show called, "Liberals gone wild" :)

Side: WTF?!
2 points

Not to mention a cure/treatment for the mental disease called "liberalism".

Side: WTF?!
1 point

Ahahahahahaha. This is gold. This is gold. Okay. They're taking it a bit far now. That seems a tad disrespectful to the people who don't have a religion.

Side: WTF?!
1 point

Begin them with intense pokemon battles, but if they insist, replace pikachu with Muhammed.

Side: WTF?!