Convince Me That AGW (i.e. Man-Made Climate Change) Is A Hoax
Troof
Side Score: 4
|
Hoax
Side Score: 11
|
|
|
|
Nice attempt to get people to disprove a negative Ah, I understand. You are one of these REALLY stupid people who fell for the internet myth circulating a few years ago that you can't disprove a negative. Why don't you do yourself a favour, shut your mouth, and call NASA. Ask them if they can disprove the hypothesis that the Sun is a hoax. Tell me what they say. Side: Troof
Convince Me That AGW (i.e. Man-Made Climate Change) Is A Hoax Well let's see here. Prove to me what "ideal climate" looks like. Prove to me that we are or aren't in it. Prove to me why it isn't the climate we are in or the one coming in 20 years. Explain why these cities that were supposed to now be under water aren't. Explain why libs say every hurricane that happens are signs of some wild change when we have always had bad hurricanes, and some of the worst on record weren't lately. Explain to me why all variances of global warming or cooling stay within about 1 degree of variance and never lurch out to 5 or 10 or 20. Now, just for grins, throw in the fact that Marxism needs Capitalism to collapse, thus has an incentive to demonize industry per the climate, and watch me stare at you. Side: Hoax
1
point
The one I have always wanted explained to me is why there are so many ancient cities under water. Was it manmade or just a normal cycle of climatology? The "natural cycle of climatology" does not debunk the evidence that humanity is affecting the climate of the planet in a negative way. Side: Troof
1
point
|