#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
Dana wants all the rights, and wants you to have none
truth
Side Score: 14
|
fuck shit ass cunt
Side Score: 15
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
it is "common knowledge" that science is true and Christianity is false. You two are like mirror images of each other. Whereas Christianity actually survives because it is not falsifiable, the thing you claim is "true" has been falsified hundreds of times about various things over the years. Both of you are stubborn, ideological idiots. Side: fuck shit ass cunt
You two are like mirror images of each other. You don't know the difference between science and religion. the thing you claim is "true" has been falsified hundreds of times about various things over the years. Science hasn't been falsified though, science is the thing that falsified the things of which you speak. When I say "science is true" I mean it's a valid methodology for finding out the truth about things and falsifying things that aren't true. Being valid is the only way a methodology can be "true". Side: truth
1
point
You don't know the difference between science and religion. You don't know when to shut your stupid mouth and understand you're committing the same fallacies as the person you are arguing with. You just claimed science is "true", but the fact of the matter is that science has been disproved on hundreds of different occasions. Therefore, either you are wrong, or it is logical to ignore all those past hundreds of times it was disproved about various issues, and simply assume it must be completely true this time. You see, the laughable irony is that you write stupid, idiotic, transparently false accusations like "you don't know the difference between science and religion", immediately after you get criticised for using the religious logic of, "it is right because I say it is". I genuinely wish you'd shut your stupid mouth. You are the absolute worst kind of idiot. Side: fuck shit ass cunt
the fact of the matter is that science has been disproved on hundreds of different occasions. What did they use to disprove it? Science? You're an absolutely mindless douche bag conflating science itself with theories which were arrived at through science, and then falsified by science. Side: truth
1
point
Science hasn't been falsified though Do you read English? Scientists spent hundreds of years assuming the universe was filled by something called the aether. They spent another few hundred years assuming the flow of time is constant and the speed of light (in a vacuum) varies (i.e. the complete opposite of reality). Science is not a full body of work which idiots like you can mimic zealots by pretending is the word of God. It is constantly correcting itself on a daily basis, which means what you claim is true today will be debunked by tomorrow. Now shut your boring, stupid face. Side: fuck shit ass cunt
Scientists spent hundreds of years assuming That wasn't very scientific of them. It's more to do with humans and their incessant need to believe things than scientific methodology itself. Science is not a full body of work which idiots like you can mimic zealots by pretending is the word of God. I clearly disagree with mainstream science on a lot of things, as you would have known if you payed any attention over the last three years. Your statements are all stupid because you pretend that believing in science itself is the same thing as believing in every theory which is currently leading in mainstream science. You are actually the retard who mindlessly believes in whatever mainstream science tells you. You believe that the universe is made of ethereal quantum units made of virtual numbers. Side: truth
1
point
That wasn't very scientific of them. Accusing scientists of being unscientific isn't really going to help support any further argument you intend to make. It's just going to emphasise my point that you are irrational. It's more to do with humans and their incessant need to believe things than scientific methodology itself. Your claim was that "science is true". Hence, your reply is a total and intentional deflection of the fact that you are wrong. You are wrong, you know you are wrong, but you won't admit it because you are angry, self-righteous and irrational, exactly like the religious people you feel so well-qualified to criticise. I clearly disagree with mainstream science on a lot of things How does matter-of-factly stating, "science is true", make it clear that you disagree with science? Are you stupid? Honestly. Side: fuck shit ass cunt
1
point
That's clearly not the same thing as saying It's the same as saying, "science is true", you stupid little cunt. every theory scientists say is true is true. Ahahahaha! Stop trying to backtrack your way out of your own stupid comments you retarded little imbecile. Science is either true or it is not true. It can't be both simultaneously you big-mouthed, arrogant, delusional little child. Side: fuck shit ass cunt
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
|